Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:Devadasu (1953 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleDevadasu (1953 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 27, 2015Good article nomineeListed

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Devadasu (1953 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 22:25, 23 December 2015 (UTC) May take up to a week...[reply]

Lede

I don't think we need to know ,"with S. V. Ranga Rao, Seetarama Anjaneyulu, Dorasamy and Surabhi Kamalabai playing supporting roles. M. N. Nambiar, Sachu and Chandrakumari played these supporting roles in the Tamil version. " Generally we just say starring a couple of actors.

 Done I have rewritten it. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Plot

Link zamindar again for clarity.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Production
  • " and Surabhi Kamala Bai were selected t" -are these two different people?
 Done that is Surabhi Kamalabai, a single person. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Release

Telugu and Tamil should be linked in first instance further up in production and delinked here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:56, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Good job, solid article!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]