Talk:Digital permanence
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Introduction Section
[edit]The introduction section is too long. Its actual text could be moved into the article body and be replaced by a synthetic description.
Self reference?
[edit]"However, not all this information is worth saving for any length of time; sometimes its value can be very short-lived. Other data, such as the contents of the Wikipedia we might like to keep around ... well, forever. This article describes how reliable different types of storage media are at storing data over time and factors affecting this reliability."
I'm pretty bad at Wiki'ing, but this bit seems to violate WP:SELF. It also seems a bit candid. Harmonex (talk) 00:30, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Digital permanence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100118090334/http://privacy.cs.cmu.edu/people/sweeney/explosion.html to http://privacy.cs.cmu.edu/people/sweeney/explosion.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)