Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:Ferguson unrest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cchesnu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename Article to 2014-2015 Ferguson Unrest

[edit]

As they currently cannot do so, @ShadowHawk555 has asked me to post this on their behalf. Should the article be renamed to include 2015 due to the recent sniper incident? - Amaury (talk) 21:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

High-profile news will continue in Ferguson for years if not decades. It is the new poster boy city for police racism issues. This non-fatal shooting would have gotten far less news coverage if it had happened in Decatur, Georgia, and not enough to justify a mention in any Wikipedia article. I'd be more amenable to renaming it to "Ferguson unrest", or just leaving it alone. ―Mandruss ☎ 22:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The sniper incident is definitely a bad reason - there's really no evidence connecting it to anything else, e.g. the protesters. For all we know now, an unusually bright ISIS sympathizer hit on it as a way to drum up discord. It is clear that protests are ongoing - I'm not so sure about "civil disorder". The article lumps together these two things under the very vague description of "unrest", but which is the real headliner? Should this be about the 2014 Ferguson disorder, or even the 2014 Ferguson riots, focusing mainly on the significant criminal actions, or should it focus on the 2014-2015 Ferguson protests, to which this is only marginally relevant? I would lean toward the latter. Wnt (talk) 22:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I think the rational first priority in general here might be a History of Ferguson, Missouri, article. It could include sections on both the shooting and the 2014 events, or maybe a single section on both. I think it can probably be argued that WorldCat contains enough entries related to that topic to indicate its notability, and it would be a good springboard for material on this incident, and any aftermath it might have, and, well, anything else in the future related to the city. John Carter (talk) 23:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Per Mandruss, leave it alone or rename to "Ferguson unrest". - Cwobeel (talk) 17:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Ferguson unrest" seems like a good choice, even if the article pertained strictly to events that occurred in 2014. Unless and until we have an article about unrelated unrest in Ferguson, there's no need to append a year (or years) for disambiguation. —David Levy 17:39, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That makes sense, we can easily move this again if a future event with no connection to Trayvon Martin happens.--67.68.31.204 (talk) 19:06, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How come this article is titled "unrest", while the 1992 Rodney King flareup in L.A. is called a riot? They were both riots. 47.137.182.8 (talk) 02:13, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ferguson Unrest?

[edit]

Maybe we should change the 1992 LA riots to LA unrest and there was a video of that Ferguson made no sense at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.210.109.162 (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would approve of it being renamed to "Ferguson's sleepless nights" or "Ferguson's 2014 late night outdoor activities".186.57.242.158 (talk) 07:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I have to comment (a year after). The above comment is the funniest thing I have ever read on Wikipedia. Good on you. Someone should put this on Wikipedia:Silly Things. LivinRealGüd (talk) 12:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Ferguson unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Ferguson unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Ferguson unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misformatting introduced 24 April 2023

[edit]

User:Mrhc2x added some text in revision 1151537453 that is poorly formatted and, at first glance, looks unencyclopedic. There have been too many edits since for it to be undo-able; could someone review that text in the section Background, please? — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk) 12:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ferguson_unrest&oldid=1233668398"