Talk:George Tutill/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 18:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
This is a neat little article about a topic and person which I know nothing about! I'm looking forward to reviewing! It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Unexpectedlydian, I love your name btw!
- I have begun the review. I have a concern about the reliability of one of the sources which I addressed below. I'll hold off on the prose review until this has been addressed. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4)
[edit]Lead
[edit]Definitely include that he was English/British. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Early life
[edit]Founding and overview of business
[edit]International business
[edit]Banner manufacturing process
[edit]Style and reception
[edit]Art
[edit]Personal life
[edit]Death and legacy
[edit]Sources
[edit]Health/formatting (Criterion 2a)
[edit]No broken URLs, I would recommend adding archive links for the two anonymous sources, as they will be really hard to find if the URLs go down. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
The "Works cited" section has a duplicate of "The art and ideology of the trade union emblem" source. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Reliability (Criterion 2b)
[edit]Mostly books from reliable publishers, with less reliable sources used to fill in only minor details. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
My only concern is the reliability of Roger Logan's "East Riding to East End" which seems to be self-published? It read like a reliable source, but I cannot find any references to the work, nor any information about Roger Logan being a subject expert. I'll hold off on the prose review until this concern is sorted out, since if it doesn't qualify as a reliable source that will significantly reshape the article. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d)
[edit]Copyvio (Criterion 2d)
[edit]Earwig finds no too close paraphrasing or violations. Will check further on the spot check. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b)
[edit]Stable (Criterion 5)
[edit]Media
[edit]This interesting website has an image for Tutill, do you have any idea where it's from? If we can find its original source, it would be a great image for the infobox. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Tags (Criterion 6a)
[edit]Captions (Criterion 6b)
[edit]Two examples of banners manufactured by Tutill for the Court Pride of Onehunga, Ancient Order of Foresters.
- It's a bit unclear that the Court Pride of Onehunga is part of the Ancient order of Foresters, rather than them being two separate entities. Perhaps something like "Court Pride of Onehunga, a group within the Ancient Order of Foresters" would be better. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Nitpick: the grammatical subject of the sentence is "Two examples of banners", bit it is clearly meant to be the two banners themselves. Removing "examples of" fixes this ambiguity. It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Link "biblical story of Zacchaeus" It is a wonderful world (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)