Talk:Grand union
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional union types, Examples
[edit]- I've added in details of 3/4, half, and butterfly unions, as they fit with the general scope of this article, without needing independent articles.
- I've done a significant cleanup of the Examples section for clarity and ease of reading, as well as adding Edmonton, Rochester, and Philadelphia examples with references and documentation.
--Hiroe (talk) 05:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Frogs
[edit]The number of frogs one encounters is:
- 4, when going right
- 20, when going straight or left (on a right-running system)
18 is not correct. I've verified this by:
- counting the image
- if you go left or straight, you cross 4 other lines fully (4 frogs required) and diverge or converge with another track 4 times, which requires 1 frog each. 4*4 + 4*1 = 20
- if you go right, you only converge/diverge with four tracks, and cross zero tracks.
I have corrected this in the article. IIVQ (talk) 11:28, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I believe this frog-counting is kinda meaningless, partly as the number of frogs will vary with the excact layout of the crossing. If for instance the radius of the right-turn curves are increased, that would eliminate two frogs. Also there may be several triple frogs where three rails cross close together, should they count as one or two? Do the designers of such crossings try to maximise the number of triple frogs to reduce the number of individual parts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.145.57 (talk) 04:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Number of tram lines
[edit]I put a citation needed on the number of tram lines needed to fully utilize a grand junction. It could use some explanation. Benandorsqueaks (talk) 05:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Grand union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110706164020/http://www.edmonton-radial-railway.ab.ca/_documents/1924.pdf to http://www.edmonton-radial-railway.ab.ca/_documents/1924.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)