Talk:HMS Magpie (U82)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

I would have thought that Magpie would also have carried depth charges? The Black Swan page references 40 depth charges. Also she participated in the sinking of three submarines. I've added "Depth Charges" but has anyone more exact information? Jim Whitaker (talk) 11:23, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would have expected that by 1959, when Magpie was scrapped, the Royal family could have afforded to preserve her for Prince Phillip, who liked her better than the royal yacht. Magpie could have found some reserve and coastal patrol roll while serving part time with Philip, with a combination of coast guard and royal funding and duties. I doubt she was beyond repair and adaptation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.200.114 (talk) 00:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Amethyst article compares poorly

Excellent article; I wonder why her far more famous sister ship's entry isn't anywhere near as extensive as Magpie's? Little grape (talk) 17:49, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]