Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:Hermann Zapf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

About "knockoff"

[edit]

I'm curious about the term "knockoff" used with respect to Microsoft's Book Antiqua. It's usually a pejorative. Is there some evidence, for example, an interview, that the Microsoft (or whoever) designer explicitly imitated the typeface? Was this underhanded or meant to pay homage to Zapf? Or is it assumed, in having similar characteristics to Zapf's typeface, to be inspired by the latter or an imitation? Even the assumption needs some citation of sorts. I would alter the sentence myself, but I am unsure of the intended meaning. It appears biased.IHendry 19:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although it's a pejorative term, it's also an uncontroversial statement in the type community. I've never heard anybody dispute the claim, although discussions come up pretty regularly. And that includes Microsoft's typography personnel. In fact, they admit it's a knockoff, although I'm sure they'd rather not put it in writing. To some extent, the proof is in the pudding; Book Antiqua is a pretty exact copy of the Palatino design, and Palatino is quite distinctive. Microsoft has since done a nice job of making up for it by licensing the real thing as well, in the form of "Palatino Linotype." Thomas Phinney 20:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

font knock-offs

[edit]

At the risk of presenting "original research" I was employed at Kingsport Press. In the early 1970s we were using the RCA GSD VideoComp (Rudolph Hell Digiset). Raymond McDavid and I were involved in digitizing a font named "University" designed by Herman Zapf for World Book Encyclopedia. I came to appreciate the hard work involved in creating font designs. The VideoComp font library supplied by RCA included what I considered a knock-off of Times called "Times Roman" and a knock-off of Helvetica called "Eterna". It was not uncommon for typesetters to "modify" an established font design, slap a new name on it, and market it with a wink and a nudge to avoid licensing fees. Often the differences were very minor (usually the design of the ampersand). I have no doubt that Zapf's designs were imitated in cheap knock-offs, and I do not blame a talented designer like Zapf for being upset for having hundreds of hours of creative work ripped off. It is often little more than the tactical equivalent of plagiarism. It is one thing for MAD magazine to do a parody of the famous painting "The Scream" but quite another thing for one to pass off a bad copy as an original work. Naaman Brown (talk) 05:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes. "In 1993, Zapf resigned from l'Association Typographique Internationale (ATypI) over what he viewed as its hypocritical attitude toward unauthorized copying by prominent ATypI members." (from Palatino).--Oneiros (talk) 13:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Hermann Zapf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Good eyesight" source?

[edit]

″His eyesight was so good that he could write letters 1 millimeter in height without using a magnifying glass″

Are we sure he wasn't so nearsighted that he could see close up easily without his glasses? What's the source on that one?

Rufwork (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

War Service?

[edit]

While interesting and even amusing, the "War Service" section offers no citations to back up any of it.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hermann Zapf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hermann Zapf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]