The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Background

Untitled

This article is controversial due to its political nature. Kindly refrain from using uncited information. The cited information should be from reputable sources, such as official newspapers and other international news sources.

Item removed

Removing it should have little harm, since we can re-add when source is given later. For biography article, it is better to play safe when it comes to unsourced attacking statements. --Vsion 06:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding PAP

Article reverted

Article reverted to original form, after removing offensive paragraph. Links and books written not to be removed.

--6 May 2006

Arrest

Arrest of Gomez

He had said to an election officer, "Do you know what the consequences are?". What he said was caught on CCTV.

This quote is not in the article. Can someone provide a transcript of the conversation. Furthermore the statement by itself does not sound very intimidating. Thank you for the clarification. --Ghormax 15:25, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up

I have read the transcript on this website. I cannot find anything that would conclude me to believe there was any "criminal intimidation" (even though the law can be interpreted to mean nearly anything). Is there also a transcript of the CCTV footage of the second meeting? Furthermore, the fact that Gomez did not want to discuss the issue with the media is understandable (especially in Singapore's case).

The government also claims: "By brushing aside the issue of what happened at the election department, he has left doubt in the public’s minds as to whether ELD had been straight in dealing with him." If this counts for the whole case of the government, it seems very weak. It was not James Gomez who went to the media to complain about the Election Department, it was the PAP. --Ghormax 16:12, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inherent Bias of writer is evident

One gets a sense that the writer of James Gomez has a bias towards the PAP. Unquotable "facts" like james gomez firing the first salvo are listed. (the first public statements came via PAP). Also the fact that James Gomez was the one that suggested to check the CCTV to the Elections Department is not referenced. This fact of course would absolve him of any "vast conspiracy" that naysayers might raise.

Article's Relevance

I wonder if this biography is really relevant. It sounds like a biography of someone who really wants to be on wikipedia and made an "effort" to do so. Is "Second Assistant Secretary-General and Chairman of the Policies and Communications Committee in the Workers' Party of Singapore" a really relevant person to be here?

If we allow everyone who wants to be on wikipedia to be on it without a "relevance criteria" then everyone with an internet connection would add themselves or ask a friend to do it for them.

I am sure there are more qualified people here to tell me he is indeed relevant but by the looks of it seems some of you are a little bit "biased". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joaosaa (talk • contribs) 17:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:External_links

Please see Wikipedia:Notability: "Publication in a reliable source is not always good evidence of notability:". Wikipedia is not a directory of links or lists, if need be, one single link to the repository of all the articles is sufficient. At most it belongs in the bibliography section, and only one link is necessary since I see all the articles are being listed from the same location[1] at the monash.edu site. Having the list of published articles by him as it was located so high in the article is illogical in any case.Zhanzhao (talk) 08:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

Made some minor edits, mainly with regards to standardizing the naming. Honorifics are unnecessary, nor is stating the full name of the subject when he is the only "Gomez" in the whole article so there's no chance of confusion. On the aside, I moved the 2001 election participation higher up to before the 2006 election is mentioned, just to put it in proper chronology.Zhanzhao (talk) 07:02, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editors with Vested Interest

I did an IP trace on 130.194.XX. It originates from Monash University Victoria Australia. The place where the subject of the article is currently working. Should this be tagged as possible self-promotion?Zhanzhao (talk) 03:09, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on James Gomez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]