Talk:Mayapan

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mesoamerica (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles

Untitled

There is an error in the section titled Excavations. It states that John L Stevens made two important drawings in 1841. (The round structure and the Temple of Kukulcan.) Stevens wrote the narrative in the book. [Incidents of travel in Central America, Chiapas and Yucatan] Frederick Catherwood did the illustrations. Michael Jones M. Div. Padremigel@aol.com

This article needs serious revision. It is based (loosely) on ethnohistoric accounts, without regards to the archaeological research. Better treatment of the Carnegie project's work should be included, as well as the most recent work at the site by INAH (under Carlos Peraza), and also by Marilyn Masson of Grinnel College. Chunchucmil 14:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ashley.spivey2.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable use of Authority Claim

I find Carnegie Institute's dispositions at Yucatan are suspicious in regard of the political history of the institute. What is the local populations impression?

--Xact (talk) 02:43, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I find your comment difficult to interpret. Are you saying, the results of Carnegie-sponsored investigations ought to be regarded with suspicion and their reliability questioned, on account of some supposed political motive or worldview held or promoted by the Institution? Or....? And what do you intend by 'local population[']s impression'? You'll have to clarify, please...--cjllw ʘ TALK 12:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation

There are viewpoints that are underrepresented. The following categories that are underrepresented are: Agriculture and Animals, Trade, Symbolism and Evidence of Inequality. In order to help the article be balanced in all of the categories, more content needs to be added to each of those categories. In order to help with the credibility of this article numerous links are found throughout the article that are not functional. For example, under the section titled Excavations and Investigations the following links are not functional: Karl Ruppert, H. E. D. Pollock, Ralph L. Roys, Clifford T. Brown, Carlos Peraza Lope and State University New York at Albany. Although this section uses references that help support the claims made within this article, the lack of functional links takes away from the ethos that is trying to be established. By removing the hyperlinks throughout this article that are nonfunctional it would further enhance its credibility. The overview at the beginning of the article lacks a clear summary and layout of the article. Although it gives an overview of the excavations and investigations it does not outline the other core areas, such as trade, that will be explained later on. Another area for improvement within the lead section are citations and reliable sources. Without having either of these elements it immediately takes away from the reliability of the rest of the article. Ashley.spivey2 (talk) 16:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Ashley.spivey2[reply]

Added Citation

Prior to adding the in-text citation, I evaluated the credibility of the statement. After researching the statement for information to I came to the conclusion that the statement was true. Therefore, I left the statement and simply added a citation that supported the claim being made. This is the source reference:

Pugh, T. W. (2001). Flood reptiles, serpent temples, and the quadripartite universe: The imago mundi of Late Postclassic Mayapan. Ancient Mesoamerica, 12(2), 247-258.

Ashley.spivey2 (talk) 20:28, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Ashley.spivey2[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mayapan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maya timeline

Secrets 107.127.39.50 (talk) 09:25, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]