Talk:Mercatus Center

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect

I've reverted a redirect to George Mason University, not so much because I think this entity deserves a separate article (I'd want to see arguments on that), but because the appropriate action if this entity does not deserve it's own article is to propose merging this article into that one, get feedback, and only then to create a redirect.

I also might not have objected if the contents of this article had been added into the George Mason University article, but that wasn't done. No attempt was made to do so; in fact, the GMU article still had (and has) a wikilink to this article, which thus became a circular link. John Broughton | ♫ 02:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Material transfered from article

These two lines seem to be taken straight from the New Yorker article, and don't seem to stand alone well without more information/context:

In 2008 Mercatus released a report saying that Obama’s stimulus-spending measures had been directed disproportionately toward Democratic districts and was forced to correct it later.^[1]

According to the Wall Street Journal fourteen of the twenty-three regulations that former President George W. Bush placed on a “hit list” had been suggested first from the staff of Mercatus.^[1]

This seems to include some synthesis of ideas from a somewhat biased source.

According to at least one critic, the Mercatus Center has helped Koch Industries financially. Thomas McGarity, a law professor at the University of Texas who specializes in environmental issues, has stated Koch Industries “has been constantly in trouble with the EPA, and Mercatus has constantly hammered” on the EPA.^[1] In a New Yorker article on the Koch brothers and Koch Industries, journalist Jane Mayer describes the successful challenging by an economist and top official at the Center, (Susan Dudley), of a proposed EPA air pollution rule that would have affected emissions from oil refineries. (Koch industries refineries have a total capacity of 800,000 barrels per day.^[2]) Dudley argued that clearer skies would result in more cases of skin cancer. In 1999, the [United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|District of Columbia Circuit Court]] agreed with Dudley, ruling that the EPA had overstepped its authority and “explicitly disregarded” the “possible health benefits of ozone.”^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caduon (talk • contribs) 11:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ ^a ^b ^c ^d Cite error: The named reference mayer2010 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Refining and Chemicals

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mercatus Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090724161547/http://www.mercatus.org/ContentDetails.aspx?id=13566 to http://www.mercatus.org/ContentDetails.aspx?id=13566

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

To paraphrase MacLean, Mercatus is widely considered a stealth political lobbying front hiding as a tax write off for the Kochs. They produce mostly propaganda and disinformation in an attempt to deliberately undermine democracy in the United States and to promote capitalism in its place. The article lacks a fair assessment of this organization and its absurd and almost impenetrable mission statement: "to generate knowledge and understanding of the institutions that affect the freedom to prosper, and to find sustainable solutions that overcome the barriers preventing individuals from living free, prosperous, and peaceful lives." This organization has never generated a single piece of useful or applicable knowledge nor has it any time proposed a "sustainable solution". In fact, it has produced a body of alternate facts and problematic policies that are completely and totally unsustainable. We are dealing with another right wing whitewashing, as this article fails to properly portray this "think tank" based on our best reliable sources. Viriditas (talk) 01:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And these "best reliable sources" are....? Marquardtika (talk) 01:25, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy MacLean, Jane Mayer, and Ann Nelson, among dozens of others. Please don’t respond with fake criticism from Koch-funded think tank fellows. I’ve been down that road many times, and it’s too predictable. Viriditas (talk) 01:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you make some suggested changes or content additions with proposed sourcing rather than posting walls of text with your own opinions. Marquardtika (talk) 01:48, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just did. Add criticism and commentary from MacLean, Mayer, Nelson, and others, such as Christopher Leonard. Now, stop playing games and asking the same question and pretending you didn’t get an answer. I’m being overly kind and altruistic by not littering this page with maintenance tags. Viriditas (talk) 02:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not your secretary. Good grief. Marquardtika (talk) 02:22, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I provided the names of four authors who criticize Mercatus. Get to work. You’ve got a lot of reading to do. Viriditas (talk) 02:50, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[mayer2010-1] Cite error: The named reference mayer2010 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[2] Refining and Chemicals

[1]

[2]