Talk:Ministry of Supply

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

No merge.

The Minister of Supply article is, and should be, essentially a history of the post holders, date in and date out, and possibly any scandals associated with that particular minister.
The Ministry of Supply article is, and should be, about what the department did, acheived, or failed to do. It also enables predecessor departments to be [linked] and discussed; as well as successor departments.
I personnally have little interest in Ministers, but I am interested in the department. I note there was a proposal to merge other ministers/departments, such as Ministry of Munitions of War. My comments would be identical, in this case. Pyrotec 16:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Potential typo

In WWII/The Royal Ordnance Factories, it's written «these were mostly designed and built by private armaments companies». Sounds wrong to me, the s at armament. But I'm no native speaker, so I'd like a more qualified person to make the decision. That's all! Cheers, Thouny (talk) 05:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are right about the grammar, but it's a total mouthful of a sentence either way! I'm going to change it to, "arms companies", which is a very commonly used contraction in English (73m google hits for "arms companies" vs 21,000 for "armament companies" vs 14,500 for "armaments companies"). Thanks Thom2002 (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ministry of Supply still active post 1959

I'm looking at a Rolls-Royce drawing that contains a Ministry of Supply stamp dated 10 October 1960. 109.68.192.224 (talk) 09:21, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QUESTION ABOUT THE MoS

Can anyone tell me what the "S.S. Division" was in the Ministry of Supply? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.20.171.127 (talk) 20:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]