Talk:Mount St. Helens

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mount St. Helens article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 6 months

Mount St. Helens is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 9, 2006.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 13, 2004	Featured article candidate	Promoted
November 26, 2006	Featured article review	Kept
July 17, 2021	Featured article review	Demoted
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 18, 2004.
Current status: Former featured article

Geology High‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Mount St. Helens is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Top‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Washington High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Top-importance).

Volcanoes Top‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climbing Low‑importance

	Climbing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climbing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climbing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ClimbingWikipedia:WikiProject ClimbingTemplate:WikiProject ClimbingClimbing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

HistoryLink - Mount St. Helens After the Eruption

minor grammar edit

In the section "Climbing and Recreation" toward the end of the second paragraph it reads "Although strenuous, it is considered non-technical climb that involves some scrambling."
It should be edited to "... it is considered a non-technical climb ..."

(btw is there a way to link directly to sections of the article from the talk page?)

A source from Express.

I've found this source here made by express (https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1283943/mt-st-helens-eruption-1980-volcano-will-st-helens-erupt-again-usgs). It says that Mount Saint Helens erupts once every 100-300 years, on average. Maybe we could add this to the article somehow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The great Jay (talk • contribs) 02:54, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A better source would be needed for this claim because the Wikipedia consensus is that the Daily Express is an unreliable source - see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Daily_Express. —GeoWriter (talk) 11:24, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 June 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the sentence "A massive debris avalanche, triggered by a magnitude 5.1 earthquake caused a lateral eruption..." to "A 5.1 magnitude earthquake caused a lateral eruption, causing a massive debris avalanche..." The original wording is confusing and I had to read it multiple times to understand. Thanks. 73.225.160.91 (talk) 00:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: Adding the missing comma (assuming that the above is a correct copy of the article text) seems to be a simpler solution RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mount st. Helens

Mt St Helens

The location of Mt St Helens is Washington United States is in southwestern Washington United States

Mount St. Helens erupts in Washington

In the eruption of Mount St Helens 57 people died

More than 200 homes were destroyed, and more than 185 miles of roads and 15 miles of railways were damaged

Since 1980 there has been no eruptions of Mt St. Helens

"Mount St. Halenas" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mount St. Halenas. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 7#Mount St. Halenas until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mount St Helens

How tall is Mount St. Helens? 2603:3010:1101:5E00:EDDE:46DB:4EAC:803A (talk) 14:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

clarity edit

> From December 7, 1989 to January 6, 1990, and from November 5, 1990 to February 14, 1991, the mountain erupted, sometimes huge clouds of ash

the last bit of that sentence, "sometimes huge clouds of ash", is unclear and seems to me in violation of some grammatical rule or something similar. 81.179.132.212 (talk) 12:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mount St. Helens needs to be added to this category. 2600:6C8A:C840:10:80:8265:C7FA:6D06 (talk) 00:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mt. St. Helen's

Interesting to see that Mt.St. Helen's has been active at one point through the years. Now in 2023 I am more interested than ever to see what it looks like today and find out if it is still rumbling. 2601:983:C100:9E90:ADAB:47A0:51FD:CBD5 (talk) 07:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect statement about activity

First sentence of the last paragraph of the first section states "After its 1980 eruption, the volcano experienced continuous volcanic activity until 2008."

Since the volcano was dormant from 1991-2004, roughly 13 years, or more than 1/3 of the time frame stated, that is a factually false statement, with no citation. Dmwilliams1979 (talk) 05:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BEBOLD and fix it. Add a citation. KelleyCook (talk) 15:27, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]