Talk:Police car/Archive 1

PPV and SSV

In the list of models that are used as police cars, each one is labeled "PPV" or "SSV". What do those stand for and what do they mean? 72.29.73.231 19:39, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Police package vehicle and special sevice vehicle. PPV's are more heavily modified for police use and are the more common police vehicles. SSV's are modified to be heavy duty, but not completely ready to use as a police car. They usually need some other addition. These are comprised of the less common police vehicles such as SUV's and sports cars. --Aqua 18:27, May 3, 2005 (UTC)

Comparisons

It may be important to make comparisons between the capabilities of the police car, Nascar cars, and exotic sports cars that are built for speed. Which cars of those three groups will come out on top if put to a race?

- Police cars are pretty much slightly modified versions of civilian street cars strictly for the purpose of policing, and aren't necessarily built for the purpose of speed (with the exception of course of various sport cars used as police vehicles), more so then for durability, safety and heavy duty work (long mileage, harsh road conditions, etc). In fact certain police vehicles such as the FWD Impala would hardly fit the description of "high-performance". So to answer that, a police packaged vehicle would lose in a race to the other two. In fact it would lose to high performance sports cars that aren't really considered exotics either. So there is really no fair comparison there to be honest, and definitely not to a Nascar (which is purely a racebred track car)!

The dodge charger is TMK the fastest widely used police car in america, and has a max speed of around 130mph. Performance cars and some sports cars can out run that if tuned properly. Having said that, its hard to get away from the police cause they box you in and stuff, or use speed strips or other tire puncture devices. 172.164.16.91 (talk) 04:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

North American Police Cars Black and White?

blue and or white are verry common Police Vehicle colours. Dudtz 8/25/05 1:28 PM EST

Markings vary by state and city in the United States. Sometimes a mandate that the car be unmarked when used for personal driving may exist, as in Connecticut. State Police there may be seen driving nearly plain Crown Victoria police cars. California Highway patrol and Los Angeles Police department cars are known for being black and white. Other states use specific schemes. Minnesota is a good specific example where state legislation governs police car colors (Minnesota Statutes 169.98 Subdivision 1. Colors and markings.) [1]

Colors and markings. (a) Except as provided in subdivisions 2 and 2a, all motor vehicles which are primarily used in the enforcement of highway traffic rules by the State Patrol or for general uniform patrol assignment by any municipal police department or other law enforcement agency, except conservation officers, shall have uniform colors and markings as provided in this subdivision. Motor vehicles of: (1) municipal police departments, including the University of Minnesota Police Department and park police units, shall be predominantly blue, brown, green, black, or white; (2) the State Patrol shall be predominantly maroon; and (3) the county sheriff's office shall be predominantly brown or white. (b) The identity of the governmental unit operating the vehicle shall be displayed on both front door panels and on the rear of the vehicle. The identity may be in the form of a shield or emblem, or may be the word "police," "sheriff," or the words "State Patrol" or "conservation officer," as appropriate, with letters not less than 2-1/2 inches high, one-inch wide and of a three-eighths inch brush stroke. The identity shall be of a color contrasting with the background color so that the motor vehicle is easily identifiable as belonging to a specific type of law enforcement agency. Each vehicle shall be marked with its own identifying number on the rear of the vehicle. The number shall be printed in the same size and color required pursuant to this subdivision for identifying words which may be displayed on the vehicle.

My understanding is that black just recently made a comeback in 2004 in Minnesota. Group29 21:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copied this from the article: To improve visibility, Toronto police cars were painted bright yellow. This colour scheme lasted from 1969 to 1986. It was then replaced by a more conventional white with a blue and red accent stripe running the length of the vehicle on either side. Not because it was bad, but it would be possible to list an example of every single agency in North America. Eventually there may be a Police car wiki unto itself with the list. This information would be valuable in an article for the Toronto Police Service. Group29 21:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The wording may not have been adequate, but the intent was to indicate one particularly unusual choice of colours. After all, in North America, one usually identifies yellow with cabs, not police cars. Denis 06:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Police cars in Greece

In the article under section 'Markings and paint schemes' it says that Greek police cars are black and white. This isn't a fact anymore. It used to be like that 10-20 years ago. Nowadays, modern police cars are white with blue "reflective" (or fluorescent as the article mentions) strips. Since I am not that familiar with changing the content of articles, I would be grateful if someone more experienced than me makes the appropriate changes.

Thanks for your time, George

--87.203.226.128 21:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the appropriate changes myself. Feel free to adjust them :-) 87.203.175.54 19:42, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photographing police cars in France?

My father told me that it is illegal to photograph police cars in France. Is this true? JIP | Talk 16:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid Police Car

I wonder if any car company is thinking about producing a hybrid PPV? C2CFAN 23:02, 19 August 2006

I think I saw either a Honda Insight or Toyota Prius on meter patrol in New York City. Does that count? __Badger151 (talk) 04:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Police cars in Germany, France, Belgium, Austria, Italy and Sweden

Peterwagen is just another oldfashioned word for patrolcars; there is no separate meaning in it, as the article suggests. I live in North Rhine-Westphalia, the biggest state in Germany (about 17 million citizens), where Ford (Cologne) and Opel (Bochum) have their great factories. So the police force of this state preferes Ford and Opel, but it depends on the prices. Some years ago, the police of North Rhine-Westphalia had Volkswagen cars for Ford had been to expensive. The Bereitschaftspolizei (rapid reaction units of the police forc)e of North Rhine-Westphalia uses vans of Mercedes-Benz, which are produced in Düsseldorf and Volkswagen, which are manufactured outside Northrhine-Westphalia in Hannover. In France, patrolcars are usually monochrome darkblue, usually of Renault and Peugeot. In Belgium, gendarmerie uses white patrolcars with red markings. So does the Austrian police. Recently, Austrian police changes the colour of their patrolcars into silver with blue marking. In both countries I noticed only Volkswagen, but that might be accidentally. Volkswagen has a great plant in Brussels. The rapid reaction units of Belgian police force use dark blue lorries of Renault and IVECO. In Italy, the Carabinieri drive traditionally Alfa-Romeo cars (today they use Fiat cars too) in monochrome extreme dark blue with white roofs. The Polizia di Stato, the other police force in Italy has predominantly Fiat cars in monchrome light blue with white roofs. In Sweden, police use Saab cars too as patrolcars. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rosa Lux (talk • contribs) 19:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Belgium abolished its Gendarmerie in 2001. As a rule, gendarmerie cars had been white, with a bright red/signal orange stripe running the length of the vehicle, and police cars white with a blue stripe. Service vehicles, Land Rovers, etc were dark blue. Motorcycles were light blue in the sixties, and white in the seventies. Federal and local police now use white vehicles, with very distincive markings on the front left and rear right, in keeping with the new corporate identity. Federal police can be recognised by markings which include red stripes, and local police by markings including royal blue stripes. Denis 06:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Germany green is not the color of the old Police cars. Some states have got green, others blue cars. For example most bavarian cars are green BMW 3 Series. The Difference between the old and the new cars is another thing: Old: White/Green or White Blue - New: Grey/Green or Grey/Blue —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.11.23.252 (talk) 18:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a few years ago all german police cars were green-white, the blue is new but not introduced in all states (yet), same is with the uniforms (old green with musturd-yellow shirts, new blue/darkblue, but not introduced in every german state yet) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.164.233.168 (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Police Vehicle Disambiguation

Currently Police Vehicle redirects here. Definition of vehicle: a conveyance that transports people or objects. It makes sense that said article should be a disambiguation page for all police vehicles, rather than going straight to cars. I am in the process of making this change now. - Bennyboyz3000 03:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Structure

As you can see i've brought a new structure to this article, giving good worldwide applicable information first, then by country. The country info still needs tidying up a bit. My thought is that each country should probably either have its own "Police cars in xxx" page, or where that would be a stub, make it part of "Police in xxx". Any thoughts? Owain.davies 20:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is excellent. The sections can then be trimmed down to smaller amounts and you can refer to the "main" for more detail. Group29 16:10, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, i thought everyone was ignoring this. If nobody else objects this week (and to be fair you've had three months...) i'll split the article down on the weekend Owain.davies 18:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little later than i thought cos i've been busy, but now Done!. Owain.davies 17:24, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, i have moved all the content out, but i don't see a problem with having a one or two sentence summary of each as part of the bullet, i just don't have that sort of time! Owain.davies 17:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Functional Types

This entire section is based on Original Research and does not cite a single source whatsoever. Batman2005 20:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong i'm afraid. It does not introduce any new theory, original idea, new terms, new definition of existing terms, new argument, analysis of facts or neologisms (the terms laid down at WP:NOR. If you'd have said just that it wasn't cited, then that's fair enough, some citations would be good - but citations in WP are only essential when the material is likely to be challenged (WP:CITE).

However, i fully agree that citations are desirable throughout wikipedia, and this is on my to do list for this particular page. I think tagging it as Original research was both premature and unhelpful. If you'd like, there are loads of web references which you could start gathering for it....

Regards, Owain.davies 11:18, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not wrong i'm afraid, in fact...i'm exactly right. There are MULTIPLE instances of Original Research in the section. The first, which I deleted as wholly untrue, is that K9 cars are usually station wagons...I found absolutely no sources for that...ergo, original research. Additionally, a quick google image search for "K9 Police Cars" shows a ratio of about 50:1 crown victoria/sedan model cars vs station wagons. Second, there are no sources for all the claims that a certain type of car is generally designed for speed or that a certain type of car has more firearms in it, etc, etc, etc. ALL original research.

"Patrol Car" - used to replace walking the beat. - According to whom? What sources do we have for this? If none...original research.
"Response car" - A response car is similar to a patrol car, but is likely to be of a higher specification, capable of faster speeds and will certainly be fitted with audible and visual warnings. These cars are (almost) only ever used to respond to emergency incidents, so are designed to travel fast, and may carry specialist equipment (such as large firearms) - Again, where do we get this information? What published material do we find which outlines the differences between a normal police vehicle and this specialized "response car." I've looked high and low through the internet and the ONLY mention of "response car" are wikipedia or mirror articles.

I could go on and on and on about this horribly written and researched section. But I won't because I don't have that kind of time. Suffice to say that the section contains numerous instances of grotesque original research and MANY unverified claims. I'm willing to put some work into it, but to argue that it does not contain original research is borderline ridiculous. Batman2005 20:44, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree that there is original research - simply not true. It may be unreferenced, but I am working on that now. You have a very US centric view of the world (evidenced by the fact you searched for K9 vehicles, a term used mostly in the US, which will return, surprisingly, american cars! In Europe, and most other places where i've seen them, there is a tendency towards the use of station wagons or car based vans like the Opel Zafira - the world does not end at the Atlantic ocean.

The chances are quite a few of these references will be from police manuals (blackstone's for instance) and hence without a web reference for you to easily check, but that's just the way it is. I will get to the references, but there is an assumption that the info presented is liekly to be challenged. I had, wrongly as it transpires, assumed that the information was self evident. Reagrds Owain.davies 22:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First off, you have absolutely no idea what kind of a centric view I have on the world, I've lived in the United States for less than half of my life, the rest of it was spent living in 7 different European countries and one middle eastern one. So I think i've got a pretty broad sense of the world. Secondly, you might as well change the title of the section to "Functional Types of European Police Cars" as nearly every source you've provided has been about European only policing. Here, where I live in the United States now, you'll NEVER hear the term "Response Car" or many of the other terms listed which are clearly European only. You might as well indicate that sometimes up to 6 officers will ride in a van..since that's the case in Saudi Arabia when I lived there, or how about how in Amsterdam the police have a seat on the tram....that's a separate police vehicle right? I agree that this is not simply an American article, however, when all/most of the sources are European, it makes it difficult to justify NOT specifically stating that the different types of vehicles listed are for the most part, referring to European policing. Batman2005 00:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may well have lived abroad, but your words thus far don't appear particularly broad minded, and that's all I can judge you on, but i'm happy to assume good faith. I have added european and especially UK references, as these are the ones I know about, but feel to add counterbalancing US examples. There is clearly a section for 'multi-purpose' police car, which probably fits the description of the vehicles of many forces, but the reason it is fourth in the list is because it fulfils the nature of all three of the preceeding points, and many police forces worldwide do clearly delineate between them. As for having heard of it, looking at your own page, you don't appear to have a law enforcement background, and as such, i wouldn't expect that you would know the difference between the types of car - it's unlikely that if you stopped a person in a street in the UK and asked them that they would know that there are four different types of police car they might see - they wouldn't know 'response car', but this is an encyclopaedia, and as such, should contain a reasonable amount of detail. As such, i think the list is fair and balanced, if still in need of some more references. As for the other items, this is an article about police cars, not police vehicles. I hope this answers your concerns on it, and i will keep looking for references for it. Regards, Owain.davies 16:46, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you're wrong. I am a police officer for quite some time now, I just don't go around advertising that fact to the world. As such, I can assure you that the "functional types" of police cars you have listed here, DO NOT, for the most part...happen here in the United States. There's no separation between a car used to patrol and a car used to respond to scenes. There are some "traffic cars" which are typically a sedan which is not intended for police use, but gets used to blend into traffic (Ford Five Hundred or Ford Taurus for instance). I state again, that all the sources you are using are European, which to me means you might as well concede that the article is only for european functional types of police cars, and not what you would see in North America, likely South America, Africa, etc. You appear to have a European centric version of the world....the world doesn't end at the borders of the european union you know. Batman2005 18:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Touché. Good, then you can put a citation and more information against multi-purpose car given that this is predominant in the US, but i don't think that makes the other types any less encyclopaedic - just because one country doesn't have them, doesn't mean they don't exist in multiple other instances - therefore worthy of inclusion. As for traffic cars, I know for a fact that there are some marked traffic cars operating in the US, because i've chatted to a cop who worked one, and the highway patrol surely qualify if nobody else. So, if you're happy, then we can expand the multi-purpose part, and try and find more citations for the other parts. Sound agreeable? Owain.davies 18:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm perfectly happy with that, I took agree that there are "traffic" cars that are marked, in fact...I spend the first year of my career working in a "traffic only" capacity. The problem that we'll no doubt run into, is that a "traffic car" is typically no different than a "patrol car." I had no extra equipment in mine, nor did I not have any that a patrol officer had in theirs. Basically it was "ok, your job is traffic enforcement, here is your car." Whereas in Europe you may have traffic cops who NEVER respond to anything BUT traffic issues. Batman2005 23:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

¿Is there any established sources for police vehicles (or ANY fleet vehicles for that matter) other than intermittent “public interest” news articles (which as often as not are written by the agency/company that the article was written about)? With the exception of a few non-binding (and often conflictery) “Technical Specifications” issued by various interest groups (for example, the US’s National Institute Of Justice might recommend one set of lights, while the Department Of Justice a different set), there really isn’t. Unless you’re willing to break this down article to agency, vehicle, and duty (more-or-less in that order, but definitely agency first), you MUST deal with some degree of “original” research- There simply isn’t any prior research to draw from, beyond that they are all cars and owned by police departments. While the article perhaps could befit from some deeper consideration, it really is petty comprehensive. 75.164.250.157 (talk) 22:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)A REDDSON[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Policemg 05.jpg

Image:Policemg 05.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Call for a universal specification for police cars

to make sure it's fit enough to do the job, like car chasing on a road.

Is there a point to this comment? Am i missing it? Owain.davies 16:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, can a 1.3 L car catch up a 2.6 L one?

The specification could include ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 compliance, such as airbags, engine capacity, and remote control mirrors etc). Have a look at the topic of Emergency vehicle

Wikipedia is not the place to call for new standards to be adopted, but rather a place to record what has already happened, therefore this does not seem notable or relevant. Also, when writing on talk pages, please sign your comment with four tildes - ~~~~ so we know who is making the comment. Thanks Owain.davies 19:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Equipment

FWIW, wheels aren't listed. I once had a 1989 Dodge Diplomat that had been a County Sheriff car. The wheels were noticeably heavier than civilian, having been made by Chrysler (rather than by Kelsey-Hayes). And yes, it had load range E tires. oops, failed to log03:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Failed again! LorenzoB 03:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drop Windows: K-9 units are equipped with remote control windows allowing the windows to be opened quickly (dropped) to allows the dog loose in an emergency (usually when the officer is in deep before they have a chance to turn them loose). 75.164.250.157 (talk) 22:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)A REDDSON —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.250.157 (talk) 22:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some are, some are not. --Badger151 (talk) 04:43, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

runlock

British police cars have a system called "runlock", where the engine can be left running without the keys being left in the car, such that the controls are disabled but the engine is still running. This means that police who have left a car can return to the vehicle and make a quick getaway, without the risk of someone stealing or disalbing the car. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.32.66 (talk) 00:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I actually bothered to look it up and add it, rather than just add comments and expect someone else to do the article :-) I used youtube as a reference, which I heard is not a good reference source for the wiki, but it's an excellent demonstration of the system, and better than any other references I could find. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.141.254 (talk) 11:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I remember seeing runlock in a Galls catalog, for anyone who has one handy (I don't, at present) --Badger151 (talk) 04:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Third world cars

No 3rd world cars: All the cars are north american and european with the exception of australian. I wated to put up a picture of a Ghana police pickup to replace one of the images. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.195.139 (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suspect transport enclosures - problem

It appears that someone just inserted a meandering rant about partition glazing and numerous other subjects. I think a more experienced editor should decide how to fix this. I'd just delete the whole section and replace it with a paragraph about what the partition does and what it's made of. Adam850 (talk) 05:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of older police cars?

There are a lot of images in this article, and they all look the same! Modern saloons, painted white with a coloured stripe down the side.

Now it's an obvious temptation to want to have a photo of "your" local constabulary's kit, but are all of these very similar images quite so necessary? What makes the best and most interesting article for the reader of the encyclopedia, rather than the best for its authors?

In particular, do we have images for some old police cars? Some notable "firsts"? First car, first radio car, first off-road car, first "panda" car (local patrol, replacing foot patrol), first traffic police cars, dog cars (and I'm sure, many others). Andy Dingley (talk) 14:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are all quite similar. Good that you brought this up. I think that there really is a need to get a broader collection of photos. A time line of older vehicles is a good idea also.

I was doing a bunch of image sorting and categorizing a few years ago and created Category:Images of emergency vehicles in the process. I never finished sorting all the images that I wanted too, but there's a chance that there may be some here, in terms of older police vehicles, that are not categorized yet. Dawnseeker2000 16:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image gallery

Having noticed on a few occasions that this article was rather image-heavy, I moved several of those images to a gallery at the bottom of the page. In general, my decisions on which images to move were based on a few factors. First, I tried to keep images in the location where their subject was discussed in the article. Second, if several images showed the same type of vehicle, and didn't add to an understanding of the subject, I left one image in place and moved the rest. Third, where lists appear, I kept images on the right of the article, so as not to disrupt the flow of the list. In other areas I alternated between left- and right-sided images. Finally, when moving images I tried to keep their order in the gallery the same as their order in the article prior to the move. --Badger151 (talk) 14:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

At the moment, the article is headed by a picture of a police car from Chennai. It's an okay picture, not great. Yesterday, User:211.26.38.199 replaced that image first with one image of an Australian police car, and three minutes later with a different picture of an Australian police car. Since neither of these images are any better than the image they replaced, I interpret this as an attempt to lead the article with an Australian car, rather than an attempt to improve the article. Thus, I reverted the changes. Today, new user User:Gaudoine has edited the article to again place one of those images up at the top. Since again, this Australian image seems to me to add nothing to the article, I reverted the change and added the Australian photo to the gallery. I have no connection to any of the photos, (I neither live in Australia nor in Chennai, nor did I take or upload any of the involved photos), but in a universal article such as this it seems to me that we should avoid replacing images merely based on the photo's origin. If there is consensus for either of the other photos I am happy to follow it. --Badger151 (talk) 01:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I find it rather silly that we don't have a picture of an American police car at or near the top of this article. After all, the U.S. pioneered police cars, and ever since then has been a global leader in the development of innovative new technologies for police cars. Instead, this article is degenerating into a gallery of bizarre police vehicles from obscure places. --Coolcaesar (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The origins of the photo shouldn't matter as much as the lead photo being as closely related to a stereotypical police car. The fact is that the Australian police car reaches this better than many in the article. The current US one is the best though. My views aren't persuaded because I am in the city the Australian car is located in - but be repectful towards people trying to improve the quality of the article. Coolcaesar is correct though - a US Police car is an obviously better option because it best reaches this stereotype. --Thompson.matthew (talk) 09:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone add some more photos of unmarked police cars? And can someone add a photo of a US NCIS, Army CID, AFOSI, or CGIS car?--L.J. Tibbs (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: speedy close: page not moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Police car → Patrol vehicle — User:Nopetro 21:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The police are not the only people who patrol in vehicles. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Any proof that police car is not the common name? Vegaswikian (talk) 01:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose WP:COMMONNAME 70.29.208.247 (talk) 06:39, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Page Patrol vehicle is now a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:01, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Police car is the more common. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - alterate name not common. OwainDavies ^(about)_(talk) edited at 12:05, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not the common name. Kittybrewster ☎ 13:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Private security groups also use patrol vehicles, but those vehicles are a different subject, and thus deserve their own article. Police Car is also a clearer description of this article: it is about vehicles used by the police, for both patrol and non-patrol duties. --Badger151 (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - The article is not about patrol cars in general, but specifically about Police cars. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 01:41, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Slang and alternate names

There are presently eleven slang and alternate names in the header. Given that even more exist (e.g sector car), I propose that we simply acknowledge the presence of several alternate names, without including them (or perhaps mutting those with their own articles under "See also") and not list them in the article otherwise. --Badger151 (talk) 22:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is any harm in giving the slang terms. There may actually be some advantage in people realising that terms such as "cruiser" are actually slang.Royalcourtier (talk) 22:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unmarked police cars

The article (as it stands) mentions that an unmarked police vehicle can be identified if one "knows what to look for". Should there be specific examples listed? I would list several, but I'm not sure if that should be kept under wraps in case someone uses the information to aid them in fleeing the scene of a crime. --Delta1989 (talk/contributions) 02:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The things that I personally look for if I think a car is an unmarked care are: whip antenna/antennae, dash lights, grille lights, lights in the rear, or lights in the side mirrors. --L.J. Tibbs (talk) 15:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decoy cars

At least here in the US, you can often find police decoy cars parked in shopping malls during the Christmas shopping season. 142.129.251.165 (talk) 21:54, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of one specific type

Would there be any objections to adding an "Animal Control/Animal Services Truck" subsection under the different types? L.J. Tibbs (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wail and yelp in the UK

Can anybody tell me please when the UK changed from the typical European high and low tone of the siren to wail and yelp? Maybe by naming also a Source? That would be great. Google is of no help to answer this question. Cheers, Alex. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.54.169.229 (talk) 09:54, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Police car. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080807130135/http://scienceandresearch.homeoffice.gov.uk/hosdb/police-equipment-technology/road-policing/police-vehicle-marking/ to http://scienceandresearch.homeoffice.gov.uk/hosdb/police-equipment-technology/road-policing/police-vehicle-marking/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:16, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]