Talk:Politics of Abkhazia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Politics of Abkhazia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Abkhazia Top‑importance

	Abkhazia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abkhazia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abkhazia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbkhaziaWikipedia:WikiProject AbkhaziaTemplate:WikiProject AbkhaziaAbkhazia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Limited recognition Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

de jure

"de jure" or "de facto" ? I say to have only the official one which is in this case only "de jure" version. Georgianis | (t) 17:10, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both. —Khoikhoi 17:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is significant de facto side, with separatist wing. Its part of politics of Abkhazia, just like Armenian in Karabakh, Russians in Transmestiya, Chechens in Chechnya and so on. Ldingley 17:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Partially Recognised" has to be used, as it is used for Taiwan, Karabagh is not the same. And Ldingley word "seperatist" is wrong and fascist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.236.50.123 (talk) 16:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Care to find a partially recognized in Politics of Kosovo article. Looks like double standards to me.FeelSunny (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"de facto seperatist"

The combined use of these two terms is unneeded imho. Either will do, now it sounds as though de facto applies to 'seperatist' rather than whatever is following the terms.

Then we must also use de facto inhuman for tbilisi politics.

Important notice

The government section of the "Outline of Abkhazia" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.

When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process. Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.

Please check that this country's outline is not in error.

If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist .

Thank you.

Branch

"Executive branch of the de facto separatist government" is incorrect. It's not that the government is "de facto separatist" – that it's to be considered "separatist" is objective. It's the independence that's de facto. Actually, it's now beyond that, because they are now already recognized by two countries. PasswordUsername (talk) 11:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]