Talk:Rejectionism

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was article was deleted.

This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was The result was no consensus. No consensus about deletion, but consensus that if kept it should be moved to Arab rejectionism, which is what it is (now) about. Can be renominated after the move..

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Untitled

I'm trying to find out more about this concept of 'rejectionism' specifically if it is, in fact, a well-defined term. It seems like a general concept, but all I find here is discussion a specific usage in the context of a Middle East conflict. The page is even categorized according to this conflict. Hmmm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.126.73.194 (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Old history restored and moved here

It was suggested in the old AfD (link at the top of this page) to "Move to rejectionism and clean up." I've restored the old 2004 history of rejectionist and moved (history-merged) it here. Hopefully helpful in determining the merits of an article on the topic. Seems there is some long-term usage of the term. – wbm1058 (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

revised

As per the AFD, I pared this article down to the term "rejectionism" and started Arab rejectionism as a separate article. Although I doubt that the general term "rejectionism" merits an article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]