Talk:TORRO scale

Weather: Thunderstorms / Tornadoes Top‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Top-importance).

‹See TfM›

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

About the Torro Class paragraph

It seems biased towards the UK when most tornadoes occur in the US. Is the Torro Scale used more commonly in the UK than other places? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JasontheFuzz (talk • contribs) 12:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing assertions

The closing paragraph of this article is confusing at best, and erroneous at worst.

To whit : winds in a tight rotating circulation, such as a tornado, are generally 1.5 times more destructive than straight line winds of the same speed. For instance, a 300 mile per hour wind in a tight circulation will produce about the same amount of damage as a 450 mile per hour straight line wind.

The problem is that the second sentence in this paragraph is mathematically at odds with the first.

Since the destructive index of a wind is known to increase with the square of it's velocity, i.e., it follows the the same laws of kinetic energy as any moving object, we would predict that increasing a straight line wind from 300 to 450 mph would make it 2.25 times as destructive, not 1.5. And increasing the speed of any wind by the square root of 1.5 (a value of approximately 1.225) would be sufficient to increase it's destructiveness 1.5 times.

Jlyall (talk) 17:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although vortical winds do have more of an effect on surfaces such as structures and vegetation, the effect is chaotic and cannot be generically quantified as asserted in the article. It's unsourced as one would expect. It's also not really necessary to be added, and if it is mentioned, it's placement below the article is not the place for it. Given these reasons, the assertion has been removed. Evolauxia (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

T11

What is the T11 effects like? 'Incredible phenomena will occur'? A T11 tornado is a tornado with winds in excess of 290mph. So essentially, think of a particularly powerful F5/EF5 tornado. Storms such as the Hackleburg Tornado of 2011 may serve as an example of a T11 tornado and that storm leveled large factories and tore concrete from the foundations of buildings.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on TORRO scale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120409111640/http://www.theweathernetwork.com:80/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=Measuring_tornadoes__F_vs._EF_scales_03_04_2012 to http://www.theweathernetwork.com/news/storm_watch_stories3&stormfile=Measuring_tornadoes__F_vs._EF_scales_03_04_2012/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on TORRO scale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on TORRO scale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205020044/http://www.torro.org.uk/TORRO/severeweather/Tscaleorigin.php to http://www.torro.org.uk/TORRO/severeweather/Tscaleorigin.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have added several tags to this article; please address these

This article contradicts the article on the Enhanced Fujita Scale that says that 5 countries use it (The U.S., Canada, France, China, and Mongolia). This article says only two countries (The United States and Canada) use the scale. I have added a “needs update” tag and a “contradicts another article” tag for that reason. Please address this article and/or the EF scale article. I am fixing to add a “citation needed” tag to the claim that China and Mongolia use the EF scale in the EF scale article. 108.147.10.49 (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]