Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

Talk:Taphonomy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Preservation?

[edit]

Would it be appropriate to have an in depth discussion of preservation here? I think so; there doesn't seem to be one on wikipedia and its definitely covered within taphonomy. || instantn00dle 12:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Study or process

[edit]

Taphonomy is a new word for me. Found it in evolutionary history of plants. There it seems to be the process of fossilization. Here it is defined as the study of decaying and fossilization. Could it be that the process in itself is included in the concept, not only the study of it? --Ettrig (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The first link is down. 216.41.199.116 (talk) 18:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greek

[edit]

As far as I know, τάφος means grave, and not burial. But maybe my Greek is too weak. We must seek a geek with a more solid technique... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stm76 (talkcontribs) 17:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

preservation bias redirect?

[edit]

This section should be showing up when you search for "preservation bias". Perhaps a redirect?

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Taphonomy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EBSCO Source

[edit]

@Uanfala: That url is not a redirect to a content page, that url is actually the login page, I can recognize the urls which have content but just requiring the login before they can be accessed. We cannot just assume that someone tried to cite something which is behind the login page. What if someone just added fake spam urls? We need to replace them with citation needed tags! Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 14:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The URL is http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=96859831&site=eds-live&scope=site&profile=eds-main. The "AN" bit is an accession number and this (presumably together with the database id) identifies a resource. I wasn't able to recover it now, but I'm sure someone who knows more about ebsco will be able to. This ref (together with several more) was added in 2015 [1] by a student editor, likely as a part of a course, and they're a different editor from the one who originally contributed the text. Given this context, removing the refs is a possible option, but not unless an effort has been made to track down the sources. – Uanfala (talk) 15:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Astrobiology is not taphonomy

[edit]

The inclusion of Astrobiology as a section here is not appropriate since fossils have not yet been found on other planets. Taphonomy is the process from life to death to fossilization, none of which is known for Astrobiology. At this point anything about life on other planets is speculative, not based on fact. 144.39.6.17 (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==Wiki Education assignment: Seminars in Forensic Science== This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2022 and 15 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dvigna (article contribs).

Wiki Education assignment: Microbial Symbiosis and Microbiomes

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 August 2022 and 14 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jdayala (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jdayala (talk) 01:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New publication describing how ancient biological cells and tissues preserve as biopolymers

[edit]

I posted the text below to the talk section for the Biopolymer Preservation page, but I think I should've just posted it here. It's a new, significant publication on molecular taphonomy:

Here is a recent, peer-reviewed publication describing, for the first time with in-depth chemistry, how biological cells and soft tissues preserve into the fossil record. Since this page is on biopolymer preservation, I think the information from this publication may be desirable to add. Here is the link to the actual article:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825223000569#f0040

And here is a link to a news article that describes the peer-reviewed article in layman's terms:

https://phys.org/news/2023-05-dinosaur-tissues-deep.html 184.170.72.76 (talk) 05:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]