User:Jerryobject

Wikipedia editor (n.) Someone who will not leave a burning building until you show them the newspaper article documenting how many people were killed by the fire.

— David Eppstein

This user is a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians. The motto of the AIW is conservata veritate, which translates to "with the preserved truth". This motto reflects the inclusionist desire to change Wikipedia only when no knowledge would be lost as a result.

Userboxes

This user enjoys volunteering.

This editor is a volunteer, and is willing to write and maintain encyclopedia articles for free.

Content contributed by this user is released into the public domain.

This user is proud
to be a Wikipedian.

inclThis user is an inclusionist.

This user is a member of the Association of Structurist Wikipedians.

This user feels physical pain when hearing others refer to Wikipedia as "Wiki".

This user has been a member of Wikipedia since 2007 April 27.

This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years.

This user has been on Wikipedia for 17 years, 7 months and 26 days.

28%This user has been a Wikipedian for 28% of his life.

15,200+This user has made more than 15,200 contributions to Wikipedia.

This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Wikipedia.

This editor is a Veteran Editor II and is entitled to display this Bronze Editor Star.

This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)

This user is block free - (see my block log here!).

This user is one of the 48,450,585 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

5This user is a WikiAdult.

This editor is a WikiGnome.

This user is a member of
the Guild of Copy Editors.

tyop
typoThis user is a member of the
Wikipedia Typo Team.

This user is a professional writer or journalist.

This user believes that adding relevant links is never a bad thing.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Disambiguation.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Redirect.

This user fixes double redirects.

This user has created several redirects on Wikipedia.

_This_user_dislikes_seeing underscores_in_Wikilinks.

<ref>This user recognizes the importance of citing sources.

<ref>This user would like to see everyone using inline citations. Please...

Info
boxThis user believes that all articles should have an infobox.

{{t|3}}This user contributes to the template namespace with confidence.

This user has created 10 templates on Wikipedia.

This user is bold, but not reckless, in updating pages.

No-one is perfect. Thus, this user reserves the right to screw up their edits just a wee bit.

This user pledges to return to
Old-fashioned Wikipedian values.

This user tries to do the right thing. If he makes a mistake, please let him know.

:-]This user is polite.

:-]	This user is polite and expects others to act accordingly.

This user believes in civility and assuming good faith.

This user assumes good faith.

This user knows that it can be a challenge to keep AGF in mind.

This user maintains a strict policy advising against all personal attacks.

This user wants to be your friend.

This user realizes one needs to have rhino skin to edit Wikipedia. And it makes them sad.

This user is willing to be slapped with a trout, should he need it.

Were this user to act in a foolish, trollish, or dickish way, they are open to being slapped with a large trout.

In an emergency, this user may be slapped with a trout.

This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality in all articles.

This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues.

>:(Vandals dislike this user.

This user fights in open resistance against the forces of the Vandals.

This user thinks that registration should be required to edit articles.

IP addressThis user supports mandatory registration.

~~~~Jerryobject signs his posts and thinks you should too!

This user's mind-reading skills are not so good. Please leave an edit summary.

What did you do?This user includes edit summaries in their contributions and thinks that everybody should use them as well.

WTF?This user ALWAYS TRIES to leave an edit summary

WTF?This user ALWAYS leaves
an edit summary.

This user feels that deletions subject to a popularity contest rather than a verifiability test damage Wikipedia more than any userbox ever could.

This user believes that only articles need reflect a NPOV, and that displaying political, religious, or other beliefs using userboxes and user categories should not be banned.

LibThis user believes in the principles of Libertarianism.

This user remembers using
a rotary dial telephone.

This user remembers how to use a slide rule.

This user is old enough to remember what a typewriter is, and that's all you need to know.

This user remembers how to use a keypunch.

This user remembers using punch cards.

This user remembers (with nostalgia) having to use punch cards to run Fortran programs in college.

This user still remembers these.

This user once used DOS back in the day.

C:\>_This user uses DOS, or knows how to use it.

> _	This user often uses the command line when operating his computer.

Wikipedia:Babel

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

en-us
-NThis user is a native speaker of American English.

en-5This user can contribute with a professional level of English.

Search user languages

en-gb-1This user can contribute with a basic level of British English.

USage declineThis user uses American English, but is appalled at its rapid and continuing deterioration.

This user honors Noah Webster
for saving the English language
from the Saxon hordes.

byThis user does not use the passive voice.

mankindThis user supports the use of gender-neutral language.

LE-0This individual still maintains a shred of dignity in this insane world by adhering to correct spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalisation.

YOUThis user dies a little inside whenever they see the word you in an article.

your
you'reThis user thinks that if your grammar is incorrect, then you're in need of help.

their
there
they'reThis user thinks that there are too many people who don’t know that they're worse than their own children at spelling!

to
too
twoThis user thinks that too many people have no idea how to use words that they should have learned in grade two.

than
thenThis user understands the difference between using "than" and "then."

itsThis user understands the difference between its (of it) and it's (it is or it has).

its & it'sThis user understands the difference between its and it's. So should you.

its
it'sIt's really not that hard to use each word in its proper manner.

ain't nobodyThis user hates seeing double negatives clutter up the English language. He wants to stomp it out no matter what it takes.

-ly	This user mourns the apparent death of the adverb, a loss that this user feels most serious.

Pickyness PickinessThis user changes the adjective ending "y" to "i" to form nouns with "-ness".

…in.Ending a sentence with a preposition is something that this user is okay with.

infinitiveThis user has no opinion about split infinitives.

whoThis user prefers using who for both the object and subject case. Who does it hurt to simplify things?

which
thatThis user typically uses "which" and "that" interchangeably.

’sThi's user know's that not every word that end's with s need's an apostrophe and will remove misused apostrophe's from Wikipedia with extreme prejudice.

’sThis user understands that apostrophe's apostrophes are for possession and contraction, not pluralization.

,This user's favorite punctuation is commas, guys, not exclamation points or whatever.

A, B, and CThis user prefers the serial comma.

,

This user supports the use of the
Oxford comma.

;This user knows how to use a semicolon correctly.

:This user has a favorite punctuation you might not have: colons.

—This user knows the difference between a dash and a hyphen, and follows MOS:DASH.

"…"This user favours typewriter style quotation marks over typographic ones.

"…"!
US vs. UKThis user uses "logical quotation marks". Forcing internal punctuation leads to factual errors. It's not a nationalistic style issue!

This user is a participant in WikiProject Software.

This user is interested in computer engineering.

10This user realizes that there are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who do not.

PC	This user knows that PC just means personal computer; a computer not running Windows may be a PC.

This user loves userboxes.

ubx-2This user is an intermediate user of userboxes.

This user provides information using userboxes to contact other Wikipedians with similar interests.

This user provides information using user boxes for statistical reasons.

This user has a sense of humour and shows it on their userpage.

This user has a sense of humour and shows it through the use of userboxes.

This user creates his own userboxes.

This user searches with DuckDuckGo.

This user supports recycling.

3RThis user believes that you should Reduce, Reuse, Recycle.

This user is seriously worried by
Climate Change

This user is drug-free.

This user does not appreciate tobacco smoke.

This user does not smoke.

This user does not smoke.

This user plays Tetris.

This user loves the Autumn.

m & ftThis American user is equally at ease with both metric units and U.S. customary units.

SIThis user uses the metric system and loves it.

2024-12-23This user uses ISO-8601 to express dates.

This user loathes, but is forced to observe, daylight saving time.

This user says let's just change our clocks by 1/2 hour and forget daylight saving time for good.

This user is an autodidact in a wide range of subjects that they never took in school or college.

This user prefers
non-fiction.

This user is interested in
science.

This user is interested in physics.

This user has a keen interest in physics.

This user is interested in astronomy.

This user enjoys skygazing and astronomy.

This user is interested in the space age.

This user is interested in aviation.

This user is interested in architecture.

This user would like to know what a black hole looks like from inside, but doesn't want to investigate it personally.

This user is interested in nanotechnology.

This user knows that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

This user enjoys Star Trek.

This user doesn't care whether Pluto is a planet or not – but IAU's 2006 redefinition of planet was a linguistic-philosophical embarrassment.

This user believes the world would be a better place if everyone had access to a quality, free education.

This user believes in logic.

This user thinks, therefore he exists.

Hanlon's RazorThis user never attributes to malice that which is best explained by stupidity. ^†

Grossman MisquoteThis user is aware that complex problems have simple, easy to understand wrong answers.

Majority ≠ right

This user recognizes that even if 300,000,000 people make the same mistake, it's still a mistake.

LWThis user believes that
what we cannot speak about
we must pass over in silence.

This user is a skeptic.

This user is a skeptic.

:(This user is a pessimist.

This user loves deadlines. He loves the whooshing sound they make as they go by.

This user knows the dire side effects of dihydrogen monoxide.
Do you?

This user thinks Sheldon is hilarious.²

MFThis user has gotta fix that step.

2This user has visited 2 of the 205 countries in the world.

1	This user has set foot in 1 continents of the world.

This user has left the planet Earth 0 times.

This user is interested in World War II.

This user loves Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky.

This user has great respect for Dmitri Shostakovich.

FSThis user is a fan of Frank Sinatra.

This user still rusts.

Are You Experienced?

This user often finds himself in a state of wonder at the vast range of David Bowie's artistic legacy.

This user is a Linkin Park fan.

80sThis user rocks out to totally rad 80s new wave music.

This user enjoys indie rock.

This user is doomed to love goth music.

This user listens to industrial.

This user enjoys
heavy metal music.

This user advocates the use of more cowbell.

This user enjoys Michael Jackson's music.

RAPThis user enjoys Rap and Hip Hop music.

This user finds the music of Skrillex to be breathtaking, and is glad he lived long enough to hear such things.

This user enjoys sampling cuisines from all over the world.

This user ❤ spicy foods

This user likes Mexican food

This user loves paella.

This user loves
Indian cuisine.

This user loves
Chinese cuisine.

This user loves
Thai cuisine.

This user loves
Japanese cuisine.

This user loves
Vietnamese food

This user loves
Italian cuisine

This user loves
Greek food

This user loves Turkish food.

This user loves
Polish cuisine

This user is a cereal killer.

SofHThis user enjoys pretzels by
Snyder's of Hanover

This user eats bagels.

This user has eaten Vegemite and is thankfully still alive.

This user believes that a tomato is biologically a fruit, but socially a vegetable.

This user eats salad.

This user eats beets.

This user loves to eat pineapples.

This user eats raspberries.

This user is constantly in a dire need of blueberries.

This user eats
dates.

This user eats eggplant.

This user eats chili.

This user is a CHILIHEAD.

This user likes
   TABASCO pepper sauce   .

This user would likely die without eating the occasional curry.

This user prefers dark chocolate

This user loves a good cup of tea.

This user drinks Kombucha.

This user drinks Lapsang souchong tea.

This user drinks oolong tea.

This user drinks green tea.

This user drinks
Mr. Grey's famous tea.

This user drinks rooibos (redbush) tea.

Though being of partly German heritage, and born in perhaps the most Germanic of US cities, this Wikipediauserenmitspectaclen bratwurstesser sauerkrautprobioticmunchenchewermassivepilen dumplinglovensmelltastern Spätzleslurpgulpisch furtakenaafterlunchsleepynap ist niengversprechenbutforgreetenhowdywelcomthanks das nienDeutschlandenresidentenlivinghome mit learnen longenwordstringmashtogethersch viacausemaken und großgutbellylauffen wunderbarteachernonsensenverbiage von Danny Kaye.

Good day.

Thank you for taking some of your valuable Wikitime to read my Wikipedia user page.

I am not an expert in software, programming, astronomy, or any other topic on which I edit or contribute. I make no such claim(s) anywhere that I am aware of. If you find any text that can be (mis)interpreted to seem as if I make any such claim(s), then notify me immediately, and I will alter such text to be far clearer and harder to misinterpret. I am an enthusiastic autodidact, and former part-time newspaper reporter, and low-hour volunteer teacher, who can think, read, write, and edit. That is all. When I make errors, notify me, and I will fix them.

Starting in the late 1990s, for several years, I edited articles on a few open content websites, including Ward Cunningham's original WikiWikiWeb, some webrings on WebRing.com (before and during the Yahoo! years), and then the Open Directory Project (ODP or DMOZ, renamed Curlie in late 2017). Then I discovered Wikipedia, and edited anonymously for a few years before registering a username (if only there were means to get credit for anonymous edits!). On Wikipedia, I pursue mostly WikiGnome-ish activities. Sometimes I do a bit more. I hope that what I have done is of value to more than a few.

Almost all of my work is informed directly by the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (MoS). If I change something in an article, then it is usually backed by some rule, or at least principle, found therein. One could say that mostly I enforce the MoS, but such phrasing sounds too punitive. I prefer to think that I am teaching or educating other editors, while gently weeding and cultivating a garden a bit. If I am feeling a bit testy, than I view myself in a more janitorial role, as cleaning up a mess. On occasion, when grouchy, I encounter work which at first impression, moves me to interpret it as evidence of mental retardation or mild derangement.

Example: Internal Wiki links that are piped with identical text (a pet peeve of mine), of the form:

[[Title words|Title words]]

When I find myself being so uncharitable, I deliberately stop myself, and try to reinterpret the strangeness, perhaps as the effort of someone whose skills in English are vastly superior to my skills in their language. That usually puts me back in my place.

Editor responsibility

Wikipedia editors have a great privilege: we are stewards and guardians of an incredibly valuable treasure. Millions (!) of people have contributed to, and spent countless hours working on, this project. This creates a weighty responsibility on us. When we edit an article, in our hands lies the fate of all prior work on that article, and sometimes the records and reputations of highly accomplished, greatly admired, or dearly loved people (featured in articles, or Wikipedia editors), who may be gone but not forgotten, yet. I try to bear this in mind whenever I edit, and work hard to ensure, and hope, that I am a worthy caretaker.

Writing experience

Intermittently, from 1979, through the early and middle 1980s, and a few times in the mid-1990s, I worked as a part-time newspaper reporter, termed a stringer, at the then Milwaukee Sentinel, now Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. My beat (specialty) was technology, science, defense, and an occasional light feature. Among many things I learned was to write very tersely. At a newspaper, more so before electronic media grew common, there was a ferocious emphasis on word count and article length. Failure to write compactly meant that lots of text might be deleted by copy editors. At times, accuracy suffered thereby.

During this time, I also edited the work of some college students, mostly term papers, and one Master's degree thesis. Two of the students told me that my work raised their grades routinely by one increment, e.g., from a C to B.

Quality

In the early 1990s, for a few years, I was a member of the American Society for Quality Control (ASQC), now American Society for Quality (ASQ). I highly recommend this truly fine organization for anyone interested in any similar or related issues. I still remember some of the basics of quality control, and try to apply my knowledge to Wiki work.

Low quality reverts

Sometimes an edit will have many (10, 20, 50, 100, or more) small changes, which seem correct, uncontroversial, conservative, responsible, precise, carefully thought-out and executed, and which seem to follow exactly the Manual of Style. Yet, some other editor may disagree with one or two points, and will then revert the whole edit.

Reverting such edits wholly is clearly incorrect, inconsistent with accuracy, and atrocious manners. Each such reversion is one more example of a low quality, thoughtless, hasty, sloppy, knee jerk, drive-by, shoot-from-the-hip revert. Sadly, these are far too common on Wikipedia. It is hard to sympathize or agree with, or sometimes even understand, the mindset of anyone reverting an edit in such a way, or behaving in such a manner. If you disagree with a point or two, then revert that point, or those few points, and no others. It is common sense, good manners, and Wikipedia official policy: WP:REVONLY.

Neutrality

Of many things I consider very seriously, one is objectivity, or neutrality in Wikipedia nomenclature. I try very hard to be neutral. This is mostly due to my basic personality, but was also further informed and refined by my newspaper experiences. But, no one can be fully neutral in all ways, no matter how great our efforts; for some insights on this see Wikipedia:Systemic bias. At least two kinds of neutrality clearly exist: attitudinal and functional. We all have many biases, of many types, and these effect our thoughts and actions. Attitude biases are the easiest to counter, mostly by consciously monitoring ourselves and working to be deliberately neutral in our actions. Functional biases are much harder to counter. We all have varied strengths and weaknesses, areas of knowledge and ignorance. Thus we work in areas we know, and perform actions we understand, and tend to perform less well outside that range. Where I do this, and accidentally harm or confuse anyone, I apologize. Tell me and I will act to improve my results.

Systemic bias example

A too-common type of unfair systemic bias occurs when Wikipedia's standards and practices for determining notability are applied to covering some types of software. The sad reality is that academic software, and open-source software, both, even when widely used, usually receive far less attention, such as reviews and awards, than more commercial forms of software. This contributes to some promising articles being deleted due to lack of third-party sources for references. Given Wikipedia's methods as of 2017, this bias cannot be avoided or even reduced. Software which is both academic, and open-source, suffers from both sources of inattention, and is doubly vulnerable.

Edit summaries

Edit summary notes are highly useful for documenting work, to explicate processes and motives for others to understand. I have devised many for my use, which also may be useful for others. So, I have listed them on an edit summaries page. These notes are never a form of attack. They exist to inform others of exactly what I have done and why, and to help them find useful and germane parts of the Wikipedia:Manual of Style from which they may learn and become better editors.

Categories

A WP:CATEGORY can be highly useful when looking for an article on a specialized or unusual topic. Here is a block for programming languages which I consult often.

• [[Category:Programming language comparisons]]
• <!-- Hidden categories below -->
• [[Category:Articles with example Ada code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example ALGOL 60 code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example ALGOL 68 code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example BASIC code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example C code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example C++ code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Fortran code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Haskell code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Java code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example JavaScript code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Julia code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Lisp (programming language) code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example MATLAB/Octave code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example OCaml code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Pascal code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Perl code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example PHP code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Python (programming language) code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Ruby code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Rust code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Scala code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Smalltalk code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example Swift code]]
• [[Category:Articles with example source code]]

Needlessly piped redirects

One problem which some edits cause, which is needless, and thus especially irksome, is links with needless pipes which redirect.

For example, after the name of many programming languages, there is the string " (programming language)". Often this creates a direct link, but often it creates a needless pipe (per WP:NOPIPE) which points to a redirect.

Examples of links that are piped and direct, thus correct:

• [[C (programming language)|C]]
• [[Python (programming language)|Python]]

Examples of links that are needlessly piped and redirecting, thus incorrect:

• [[C++ (programming language)|C++]]. Instead, the unpiped direct link is [[C++]].
• [[Perl (programming language)|Perl]]. Instead, the unpiped direct link is [[Perl]].

If you don't know for sure if a link is optimal, why not check it first? It is easy and fast, taking only several seconds! Check links after making them, via the Show preview function, but before saving edits, via the Save page function. On the article edit page, simply use the Show preview function to display the links in their published form, and then WP:TESTLINK (click on) them, before saving. Then, you can use the Show changes function to see all changes that you made up to that preview.

Only then, after confirming that everything is correct, should you save.

Actual? Itself? Himself? Herself? Themselves? No!

Some words are all too easy to overuse, and sadly, are overused routinely, and usually incorrectly, to the extent that many or most instances of their use become useless linguistic junk. For example, most common uses of the words "actual", "itself", "himself", "herself", and "themselves" are vague, imprecise, ambiguous, and almost meaningless; some type of strange needless intensifier when occurring immediately after a referred-to term. Such words can almost always be cut from a sentence with no change in the meaning. Here are some examples:

• They can almost always actually be cut from an actual sentence with no change in the actual meaning.
• They can almost always be cut from a sentence itself with no change in the meaning itself.
• They can almost always be cut from sentences themselves with no change in the meanings themselves.

Proofread! Try it! Communication begs for clearer terms. Readers need clear semantic guidance as to what an author's references are about.

Userboxes

I have created a few userboxes. As with all I do, if you like one, or more, please feel free to use it-them.

Music articles

I have worked extensively on a few non-technical articles, a few about Music groups which I know and enjoy, and of which I am a fan: Cyberchump and Palm Ghosts. Disclosures: For the Palm Ghosts article, the first version was written mostly by band founder Joseph Lekkas, with encouraging, and extensive coaching and technical edits (templating, WP:LINKs, WP:CATEGORYs), and some WP:REFerence WP:CITations and text edits, by me.

WikiProject software announcement

Announcement

• Software Wikia is a wiki specialised on software using semantic extras. If a nice article does not have the required Wikipedia:Notability, simply export it and ask an admin for an import there.
• WikiProject Free Software is now merged with WikiProject Software. The link to WikiProject Free Software is Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Free Software.
• To better serve Wikipedia, WikiProject Malware is now under the parent of WikiProject Computer Security. All Malware articles are currently being transferred over to the new project. In any case, you are welcome to join at WikiProject Computer Security!
• All members of WikiProject Software are urged to install the Centralized Announcement System on their talk page.
• I have changed the participant (members) table by replacing the Task column with Area of Expertise. I also introduced a new template based status system so as to "arrange" the members according to whether they are active, semi-active, inactive, or retired. Please update your entry accordingly.
• New IRC server! The old channel on Freenode is not used anymore. See See here. Manual for using IRC can be found here for why. Find us at:

Server host	irc.libera.chat
Port	6697
channel	#wikipedia-en-software
quick access	https://web.libera.chat/?#wikipedia-en-software

Tasks to finish

Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Work on the tasks listed below. Photo : Category:Software articles needing images Stubs : Expand stub pages listed at Category:Software stubs Other : Draw in more participants; review software articles nominated for deletion

WikiProject Software to do list

• The following topics are missing an article; calling all enthusiasts to start these articles urgently. [Read the Talk page]
  • Gordian Knot (software), AutoGK, a bit obsolete, but still worth an article, or two (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeSweet)
  • Topaz Labs (software), photo editing software in the same vein as Photoshop or NIK software. The company has expanded and is used by many various fine art and photography professionals. www.topazlabs.com. Deserves an article.
  • (please feel free to add more)

• The following articles need some updating and cleanup (please feel free to add more):
  • BlueSpice for MediaWiki
  • Cabri Geometry, article too short but of significant importance
  • Defraggler
  • EmEditor, needs notability references, and general improvements
  • Ext4
  • Flowtracer
  • Google File System, tagged with {{Expert-subject|Software|date=November 2008}}
  • Home Assistant (seems to be consensus that this needs cleanup from uninvolved editors after its 2nd AfD, as of 2021-04-02)
  • Hypervisor, the PCs and desktop systems section needs attention
  • Jv16 powertools [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]
  • KVIrc
  • Light (web browser), just created, it's decently written but still really short, and it's not part of this project yet
  • mdadm, mostly non-encyclopedic content (HOWTO/manual)
  • Micro Transport Protocol, widely used since uTorrent 2.0 released
  • Ntfsprogs
  • Norton 360
  • Recuva
  • Presentation Manager, requesting screenshot of GUI, also needs references
  • Program Information File
  • Software as a service
  • Windows library files
  • XNUMBERS
  • Zamzar
  • Zero Install, a bit confusing article, needs to be explained more clearly
  • Autodesk Media and Entertainment, major content deletion happened for cleanup on 17 March 2008 (11,000K to 2,000K), and now it's so outdated & stub-like it needs a total rebuild
  • List of web application frameworks, go through the articles of listed frameworks and nominate for deletion the non-notable ones, clean the list from non-notable ones, clean Template:Application frameworks
  • Aviary (application suite) Needs major updating, referencing, and clean up.
  • Scrumban article reads like a sales brochure and I don't have the subject knowledge to fix it.

• The following page lists articles that need expert attention from WikiProject Software and have been tagged by {{Expert-subject|Software}}:
  • Category:Software articles needing expert attention

Installation instructions (click show to view)

To install the WikiProject Software Centralized Announcement paste the following code to the top of your user talk page:
==WikiProject Software==
{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Announcement-u}}<!---->

WikiProject Software

Refresh the contents of this page