User talk:Alpha3031
Index
|
|||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Books & Bytes – Issue 65
[edit]The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024
- Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
- Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
- Tech tip: Mass downloads
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Question from BahadurpurTop1 on Software-defined perimeter (16:48, 18 November 2024)
[edit]Shamim Ahmed Tuhin He is a famous mobile editor and gamer BahadurpurTop1 known as . --BahadurpurTop1 (talk) 16:48, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: StanleyMOV
[edit]Hello Alpha3031. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of StanleyMOV, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Coverage in the BBC is a credible claim of importance - use WP:AFD if you feel the article needs to be deleted. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- EDWM Truth (talk · contribs)
This page was submitted after I saw that the "List of Doctoral Degrees in the US" page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_doctoral_degrees_in_the_US) did not have an entry for this degree. Almost all of the other degrees had pages. I was trying to fill a gap and provide information. I know of no other secondary sources for this entry as it is a degree. It is offered by Arizona State University, a major university that I reference. What other sources are you looking for?
EDWM Truth (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- (replied on other talk page) Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:32, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Mogh-Nuadat (12:04, 3 December 2024)
[edit]Hey I hope you're well :) I made this account so I could expand the Irish language Wikipedia. I was wondering if I could just copy sources from the English language pages and translate into Irish? Or would I have to find Irish sources on topics, which I don't think would be very extensive seeing as most of our university courses run through English these days. --Mogh-Nuadat (talk) 12:04, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Mogh-Nuadat, I believe it should be alright to do so, I don't see any policy against using english sources on Irish Wikipedia. However, each language Wikipedia is its own project with its own rules, so the best place to ask for more technical/obscure points of policy might be at ga:Vicipéid:Halla baile or directly to one of the users active on that project, as some might be different. Again, using english language sources specifically, or other non-Irish language sources for that matter, should be perfectly fine, and as long as you start slow, if there is something people are concerned about they will likely reach out to you, so do go ahead, but also keep in mind each wiki is independent and make their own rules. Happy editing! Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:50, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi Alpha3031. Thank you for your work on Selection policy. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
This is a very generic phrase and seems to be used in many fields. Try to convert this to a disambiguation page.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors December 2024 Newsletter
Hello, and welcome to the December newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. If you no longer want this newsletter, you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. If you'd like to be notified of upcoming drives and blitzes, and other GOCE activities, the best method is to add our announcements box to your watchlist. Election news: The Guild's coordinators play an important role in the WikiProject, making sure Drive: In our September Backlog Elimination Drive, 67 editors signed up, 39 completed at least one copy edit, and between them they edited 682,696 words comprising 507 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: The October Copy Editing Blitz saw 16 editors sign-up, 15 of whom completed at least one copy edit. They edited 76,776 words comprising 35 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: In our November Backlog Elimination Drive, 432,320 words in 151 articles were copy edited. Of the 54 users who signed up, 33 copy edited at least one article. Barnstars awarded are posted here. Blitz: The December Blitz will begin at 00:00 on 15 December (UTC) and will end on 21 December at 23:59. Sign up here. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 22:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have completed 333 requests since 1 January, and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,401 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wracking. To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Message sent by Baffle_gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:48, 7 December 2024 (UTC).
Question from TheSwagger13 (05:28, 10 December 2024)
[edit]Hi. How do I make a good reference? --TheSwagger13 (talk) 05:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TheSwagger13. The best way to add references depends on if you're using the "Visual Editor" (everything looks the same as reading the article) or "source editor" (things like section headings have markup code like
==Heading==
). You can find a guide to referencing in VisualEditor at Help:Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor/2, for source editor, you can find a similar guide at Help:Referencing for beginners. Best of luck! Alpha3031 (t • c) 10:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Eotb112022 (22:06, 13 December 2024)
[edit]Hello, any chance you could review a draft I have created that was declined to be moved into wiki-space and help me out? I don't necessarily understand all of the reasons that it was declined. I understand I need more credible references, but other than that could you give me feedback on any other improvements? The draft is for public figure George Bebbington. --Eotb112022 (talk) 22:06, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Eotb112022. Sorry for the late response, there are 4 different criteria to satisfy for your most important sources (and you only need about three of those most important sources, but they must meet all four criteria). As you've mentioned yourself, the sources must be reliable — a lot of the time, this is judged on a case by case basis, but there are general rules. For biographical articles on living persons, the criteria tend to be especially strict, and tabloidy publications like Digital Spy might not be considered entirely suitable. The sources that make up the core of your article must also be significant (in-depth), independent (not interviews or mostly quotes) and secondary (contain analysis, evaluation or interpretation of the facts by the source, which is the journalist for news sources).
- Text–source integrity is also something very important to pay attention to, for example, "Ex on the Beach is back – but with a new twist", currently your second inline citation is used to support being a cast member of a show, but does not, as far as I can tell, actually mention Bebbington. You should remove it and replace it with one of the other references. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:28, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello again, no worries I appreciate the reply!
- I've combed through citations, linking reused links, interviews not conducted by journalists, removing irrelevant citations with better sources.
- Thank you again, if possible could you let me know if you recommend any other fixes or changes, it'd be much appreciated. Eotb112022 (talk) 12:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Eotb112022, I do want to clarify that it's not only about who conducts the interview. In order to meet all 4 criteria, an interview would typically need parts written by the journalist (and not just the answers to interview questions) in order to be independent in terms of the content. That independent content needs to be or have
analysis, evaluation, interpretation, or synthesis
in order to be considered secondary. The secondary parts need to have enough depth that you can write most of an article with around three of those sources. - Being by a journalist from a reputable news organisation is enough to be reliable in most cases, but your core sources need to meet the other three criteria as well. Once you have three or four core sources (or two, sometimes), you can use less detailed or independent sources to fill out the rest of the article of course, but the first thing you should do is find and identify your three core sources.
- Also, happy new year! Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Eotb112022, I do want to clarify that it's not only about who conducts the interview. In order to meet all 4 criteria, an interview would typically need parts written by the journalist (and not just the answers to interview questions) in order to be independent in terms of the content. That independent content needs to be or have
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Khunkyawzinoo on Wikipedia:Writing better articles (22:00, 24 December 2024)
[edit]Darkness --Khunkyawzinoo (talk) 22:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 26
[edit]Hello everyone, and welcome to the 26th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 August 2024. At press time, over 94% of the world has legally fallen prey to the merry celebrations of "Christmas", and so shall you soon. It's been a quiet 4 months, and we hope to see you with way more new scripts next year. Happy holidays! Aaron Liu (talk) 05:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
[edit]- Very useful for changelist patrollers, DiffUndo, by Nardog, is this edition's featured script. Taking inspiration from WP:AutoWikiBrowser's double-click-to-undo feature, it adds an undo button to every line of every diff from "show changes", optimizing partial reverts with your favorite magic spell and nearly fulfilling m:Community Wishlist/Wishes/Partial revert undo.
Miscellaneous
[edit]- Doğu/Adiutor, a recent WP:Twinkle/WP:RedWarn-like userscript that follows modern WMF UI design, is now an extension. However, its sole maintainer has left the project, which still awaits WMF mw:code stewardship (among some audits) to be installed on your favorite WMF wikis.
- DannyS712, our former chief editor, has ascended to MediaWiki and the
greenerpurpley pastures of PHP with commits creating Special:NamespaceInfo and the__EXPECTUNUSEDTEMPLATE__
magic word to exclude a template from Special:UnusedTemplates! I wonder if Wikipedia has a templaters' newsletter...
Improve a script
[edit]- Many of our favorite scripts such as Fred Gandt/userResourceManager, Guarapiranga/search-shortcuts, and Bradv/Superlinks haven't been updated for Vector 2022. You could be the one to change that!
- Elominius/media timer and PrimeHunter/Search sort work, yet have alien user interface design. Someone could improve them...
- BilledMammal/Move+ needs updating to order list of pages handle lists of pages to move correctly regardless of the discussion's page, so that we may avoid repeating fiasco history.
Requested scripts
[edit]We need scripts that...
- allow you to edit {{sfn}} references graphically a la Ingenuity/ReferenceEditor
- copy specific named references from other pages to help with splitting and whatnot
- make adding icons/links to the top toolbar (or other portlets) much easier
- graphically generate a {{source assess table}}
- award a Four Award
- ...and many more, all available at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests. Thanks to the editors at US/R—including Nardog, User:Novem Linguae, User:Jeeputer, and many more!—for their work in processing userscript requests this past year.
Updated scripts
[edit]- Andrybak/Unsigned helper forks Anomie/unsignedhelper to add support for binary search, automatic edit summaries after generating the {{unsigned}} template, support for {{undated}}, and support for generating while syntax highlighting is on.
- Pour one out: DreamRimmer/User not around forks Andrybak/Not around to allow configuration precise to a number of days (from the original precision of years).
- Red-tailed hawk/cv revdel forks Enterprisey/cv-revdel to automatically add CopyPatrol reports.
- Polygnotus/Move+ updates BilledMammal's classic Move+ to add automattic watchlisting of all pages—except the target page(s)—changed while processing a move.
Newly maintained scripts
[edit]- Administrators only! Novem Linguae/UnblockReview forks the now-broken Enterprisey/unblock-review to review unblock requests with a graphical interface.
New scripts
[edit]- 1AmNobody24: Find Link provides a shortcut to its namesake tool, Edward/Find link, which helps de-WP:ORPHAN articles.
- Andrybak: Contribs ranger (pictured) generates links to a limited range of user contributions, log items, or page history. You see, it's not just contribs!
- CanonNi/VoteVisualizer is a rewrite of Pythoncoder/voteSymbols that makes everything saner to configure.
- When viewing Category:Articles missing coordinates with coordinates on Wikidata, Jeeputer/coordInserter adds links to automatically insert coordinates into the article selected.
- To satiate archaeology and curiosity (the same thing, perhaps?), JJPMaster/AfC time logger logs the time it takes for a user to review each submission to Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
- Natdog/InsertAnyChar adds a searchable list of all Unicode characters to the 2010 source editor.
Question from Dr. Anant kumar tiwari (05:22, 27 December 2024)
[edit]hi, i have to get articles about orthopedic surgeon guide me which category i have to choose --Dr. Anant kumar tiwari (talk) 05:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Dr. Anant kumar tiwari, if you're writing an article for the first time, you don't have to worry about putting it in any specific categories. I would recommend submitting things through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, as there will be a reviewer that usually sorts the article into some relevant categories for you as part of the process. Even once the article is published into the main article space, there is still time to add more categories that are relevant, and people who go around doing exactly that.
- However, we do recommend reading our guide on writing new articles, Help:Your first article, and if this article is about yourself (or someone you know personally or professionally), the guides at Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Reading and understanding the guides is key to getting your article written in a way that could be accepted. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Question from Mahmoud Jama (22:56, 28 December 2024)
[edit]hello i want to create a artical about a hacker called mahmoud jama and to warn ppl from random friend requests or spam emails --Mahmoud Jama (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Mahmoud Jama, you can find a guide on how to write your first article at Help:Your first article. However, if there aren't any existing published sources, such as news articles about this hacker, it is unlikely we would be able to host such an article on Wikipedia. You can still collect all the evidence you have and post it somewhere on the internet to share with your friends, and there are many free blogging services for example that you can use to do this, but Wikipedia has specific content requirements. Alpha3031 (t • c) 06:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)