Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

User talk:Alphachimp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Please click here to leave me a new message and I will respond here. I suggest temporarily watching this page.
Please SIGN your comments using ~~~~. I may not be able (although I will try) to respond to unsigned comments.

If you are coming here to request immediate administrator assistance, you might do better on WP:AIV, WP:RFPP or WP:ANI. I do have a life, and I may go days or weeks at a time without using Wikipedia.

Note to admins: If you disagree with one of my blocks, simply reverse it. I block a lot of users, and some of those blocks are bound to be controversial. I don't apologize for that, but I'm willing to take a look at decisions that frustrate you.

Warning If you received a vandalism warning from me and don't know why, you are probably browsing with an IP address used by many different people. You should not be concerned, as the warning was probably not meant for you. If you are blocked and feel you should not be, you are welcome to put {{unblock|Reason why you should be unblocked}} on your talk page. Thank you.
Further reading: Wikipedia:America Online, Wikipedia:Blocking policy, Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies



Archive
Archives

Topic Index (Updated Daily)

  1. May 2005 - April 2006
  2. May 2006
  3. June 2006
  4. July 2006
  5. August 2006
  6. September 2006
  7. October 2006
  8. November 2006
  9. December 2006
  10. January 2007
  11. February 2007
  12. March 2007
  13. April 2007
  14. May 2007
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 2 days are automatically archived to User talk:Alphachimp/Archive 14. Sections without timestamps are not archived.


Maccast Deletion Review

[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of The_Maccast. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Edits at Uncle Ben's

[edit]

Dear Alphachimp: I have noticed you have expereince in editing / updating http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Ben's

Would you consider assisting in making corrections to the content so that it is accurate. Here is the history and evidence to support the history:

www.huzenlaub.com and http://huzenlaubunclebens.blogspot.com/ and http://huzenlaubinthenews.blogspot.com/

JIm Shapiro

[edit]

Hi: I am new to Wikipedia. My username is ArieltheUnicorn. I was utterly'dismayed'''''''at reading the messages about the article on Jim Shapiro. In fact, I used the link and read the article for myself to seee what all the fuss was about. My Dad always taught me to make up my own mind on things like this!! ;0) I AGREE COMPLETELY with the Administrators that the article should have been deleted IMMEDIATLEY!!!!! There was NOTHING positive in the article AT ALL!!! :( :( :( JIm Shapiro is apparently a complete SNAKE he is the type of attorney that all the jokes were made up about! You know, the ones that give the rest the bad reputation!

Deletion of The Maccast entry

[edit]

Hi, On August 26th, 2007 I posted the following in your talkback and I have not received a response yet. Can you please upate me on this request? Thank you.

I am writing to request that you re-list the page related to my podcast. I currently have a page listing my bio here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Christianson and the Wiki link to the information on the podcast itself is a dead since this page was removed. Your rationale for de-listing was cited as CSD A7 - Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. My podcast is listened to by over 25,000 people worldwide each week. I would argue that is "significant". The show provides entertainment value on par or equal to that of other radio and video shows that are listed elsewhere on Wikipedia. Please reconsider your decision to remove this content.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phylaxis (talk • contribs) 05:27, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the (apparently) invalid WP:AIV report. At the time, from what I understood, personal attacks in all forms are unacceptable. I was patrolling the sandbox, and found this, that looked like an attack. I warned, then he/she added this. I gave a final warning, and then the user added [1]. I thought that it was unacceptable for anyone to add something like " ALL OF THE WIKIPEDIA MODERATORS AND ADMINISTRATERS LOVE SUCKING COCK", "Wikipedier is a pussy", etc. I guess those kind of attacks don't warrent a block for WP:NPA, and I'll ignore such things in the future. Again, sorry for the invalid report.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 21:39, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 3 14 January 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: A new weekly feature 
Special: 2007 in Review Wikimania 2009 bidding ends, jury named 
Controversial non-administrator rollback process added Supposed advance draft of Jobs keynote surfaces on talk page 
WikiWorld comic: "The Nocebo Effect" News and notes: Fundraiser ends, $500,000 donation, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Tutorial: Fundamentals of editing 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 4 21 January 2008 About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part II New parser preprocessor to be introduced 
Commons Picture of the Year contest in final round WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" 
News and notes: Freely-licensed music, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 5 28 January 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: New feature 
Special: 2007 in Review, Part III Signpost interview: John Broughton 
New parser preprocessor introduced Best of WikiWorld: "Truthiness" 
News and notes: Estonian Wikipedia, Picture of the Year, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Tutorial: Reporting and dealing with vandals WikiProject Report: Molecular and Cellular Biology 
Wikipedia Dispatches: Banner year for Featured articles Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 6 4 February 2008 About the Signpost

Special: 2007 in Review, Part IV Tensions in journalistic use of Wikipedia explored 
Best of WikiWorld: "Calvin and Hobbes" News and notes: Milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Tutorial: Adding citations 
Dispatches: New methods to find Featured Article candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 7 11 February 2008 About the Signpost

Petition seeks to remove images of Muhammad Foundation's FY2007 audit released 
Vatican claims out-of-context Wikipedia quote was used to attack Pope Best of WikiWorld: "W" 
News and notes: Working group, Wik-iPhone, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Tutorial: Basic dispute resolution Dispatches: Great saves at Featured article review 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 8 18 February 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Michael Snow, Domas Mituzas appointed to Board of Trustees WikiWorld: "Thinking about the immortality of the crab" 
News and notes: Administrator desysopped, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Tutorial: Getting an article to featured article status Dispatches: FA promotion despite adversity 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 9 25 February 2008 About the Signpost

Signpost interview: Michael Snow Controversial RfA results in resysopping of ^demon 
Sockpuppeting administrator desysopped, community banned Two major print encyclopedias cease production 
WikiWorld: "Hyperthymesia" News and notes: Wikimania Call for Participation, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News WikiProject Report: Family Guy 
Dispatches: A snapshot of featured article categories Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Staten Island Railway stations

[edit]

Hey Alphachimp, haven't seen you in a long time. Listen, I need to ask you a favor. Me and the other participants at WT:NYCPT have worked on creating articles for Staten Island Railway stations and have also modified {{Infobox NYCS}} for SIR article use. But we need to find the opening dates for the SIR articles. But we need to find the opening dates for the stations, and surprisingly; nycsubway.org and stationreporter.net have them. So let me know if you come across any sources that can provide this. I'll continue adding the infoboxes to the stations. Thanks.

Other than that, what's going on? I haven't seen you around the project for a long time. Knowing you're an admin an all, I really do hope you still do participate at the project. Marc Shepherd has also returned and we've also been getting a substantial amount of help from Larry V and NE2. So things at the project are okay, and I hope you're good too. So get back to me when you can, and enjoy your wikibreak. —Imdanumber1 (talk contribs  email) 20:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 10 3 March 2008 About the Signpost

Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties Eleven users apply for bureaucratship 
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas Role of hidden categories under discussion 
Book review: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Military history WikiProject elections conclude, nine elected 
Best of WikiWorld: "Extreme ironing" News and notes: Encyclopedia of Life, Wikipedian dies, milestones 
Dispatches: April Fools mainpage featured article WikiProject Report: Football 
Tutorial: How to use an ImageMap Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar of Diligence

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
I hereby award Alphachimp the Barnstar of Diligence for their continued work in making sure that editors reported to Administrators intervention against vandalism are hastily reviewed for their vandalism, and blocked if necessary! The community appreciates your actions, because without Administrators like you, vandals would be running loose everywhere! Thanks! ✬Dillard421✬ (talkcontribs) 07:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! :D alphachimp 07:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know

[edit]

You didn't add a block notice to the the talk page. Was that intentional? Thanks for blocking the disruptive user, Enigma msg! 17:06, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think that block went through, because it did not show up on block list. Sorry about that, it was an oversight on my part. alphachimp 06:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Castratingkittens

[edit]

He's requesting unblock. While I would like to see him change the username, do four vanity edits really warrant an indefinite block? I'm inclined to unblock and offer another chance, unless there's more to the story. Daniel Case (talk) 08:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the username merited an indefinite block by itself. I have no objection if he changes his username. alphachimp 13:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, looks like he was inidef blocked. alphachimp 13:47, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging of WikiProject Companies articles using Alphachimpbot

[edit]

Hi. As per the discussion over at Bot Requests, are you still willing/able to help out with my request? If so, here is what I would like Alphachimpbot to do:

Main Task

Additional Tasks, not required but would be nice if they are easy to accomplish

  • Set the class parameter of the WikiProject Companies banner to "Stub" if a stub template is used on the article
  • If the banner for WikiProject B&E ({{Business}}) is already on the talk page, but the class & importance parameters have not been set, then remove it (this was agreed with WP B&E participants at this discussion)

Let me know your thoughts. Thanks! Richc80 (talk) 12:54, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into setting it up and get back to you. alphachimp 13:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am beginning to set up the bot for this run. Thanks for your patience. alphachimp 03:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect, thanks again for your help!! Richc80 (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

71.193.17.159

[edit]

Thank you for responding to my request to block this IP. --InvisibleDiplomat666 17:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to nominate you for a position in the Bureaucracy. After reviewing some of your contributions, I think you would make a great addition on behalf of the Wiki community. Please reply on my talk page. --InvisibleDiplomat666 17:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! At this point I'd rather not be a bureaucrat, simply owing to the time required for such a post, and the unnecessary stress that would come about as a result of the nominating process, but thanks again :D. alphachimp 22:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) AGK § 18:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. That would be me. Found out from Metros I gotta go through a validation and creation process for the nomination. So, if you concur I would be happy to nominate you for RfB. --InvisibleDiplomat666 19:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I responded above. alphachimp 22:23, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Long time

[edit]
Just popping in to remind you about the possible botting. On a completely unrelated topic how long did it take you to become an admin? I know it is very off topic but I am a curious person. –– Lid(Talk) 10:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Your name popped up while browsing which surprised me as I thought you had vanished sometime last year, nice to see you. As it turns out it takes fourteen months from that comment for me to become one and due to you helping me out a fair bit way back when this means you are indirectly responsible for the hundreds of complaints on my talk page from creators of articles I have deleted. Now how do you feel? –– Lid(Talk) 11:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

haha, there's nothing quite like causing lots of complaints. Congratulations on your relatively new adminship. I wish I had known so that I could have voted. Keep up the good work, alphachimp 20:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my page deleted?

[edit]

Hello. I posted an article about the North American Nunchaku Association and you removed it. Please let me know why. There should be no reason it was removed.

Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hikeba (talkcontribs) 02:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article failed WP:CSD criteria A7 regarding the notability of groups. alphachimp 03:00, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weird HelperBot behavior

[edit]

I dunno how often you monitor the AIV Helperbot talk pages, but there have been a couple of weird report deletions by Helperbot2 recently (User talk:HBC AIV helperbot2#Odd report removal). I am guessing there is a race condition where helperbot reads the page, as user submits a report, then helperbot writes the page back?

If so, you probably already thought of this, but I suppose the bot (or, sigh, another bot) could detect this kind of condition by looking at the helperbot edit summary and if there were modifications that did not match the edit summary, restoring those?

I dunno, just thinking out loud. Or maybe this race condition happens so rarely that it doesn't matter :) --Jaysweet (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 11 13 March 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Accusations of financial impropriety receive more coverage Best of WikiWorld: "Five-second rule" 
News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Vintage image restoration WikiProject Report: Professional wrestling 
Tutorial: Summary of policies Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 12 17 March 2008 About the Signpost

Best of WikiWorld: "The Rutles" News and notes: Single-user login, election commission, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Changes at peer review 
WikiProject Report: Tropical cyclones Tutorial: Editing Monobook, installing scripts 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:13, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.255.15.72 (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 13 24 March 2008 About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers" 
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter WikiProject Report: Video games 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:41, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 14 31 March 2008 About the Signpost

Wikimania 2009 to be held in Buenos Aires Sister Projects Interview: Wikisource 
WikiWorld: "Hammerspace" News and notes: 10M articles, $500k donation, milestones 
Dispatches: Featured content overview WikiProject Report: Australia 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Status on WP:NYCPT

[edit]

Hello. I've noticed that you have registered as a member of WP:NYCPT. Please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject New York City Public Transportation/Participants and add or correct you status as an active or semi-active member, as well as if you are an admin, whay projects you work on, and a sample of the work you do in the NYCPT scope. Thank you. —Imdanumber1 (talk contribs  email) 15:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost

April Fools' pranks result in temporary blocks for six admins WikiWorld: "Apples and oranges" 
News and notes: 100 x 5,000, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Reviewers achieving excellence Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 15:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles Image placeholders debated 
WikiWorld: "Pet skunk" News and notes: Board meeting, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Featured article milestone 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

[edit]

Alpha, I have checked the edit you mention:

( diff) (hist) . . m Pimenta‎; 20:53 . . (+393) . . IceCreamAntisocial (Talk | contribs) (link spp)

...and (to the best of my knowledge, have found him clean. Not guilty. All he wrote seems totally true to me.

Regards, --AVM (talk) 01:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HBC AIV helperbot2

[edit]

Hello, just letting you know that your bot (as well as all the rest in the series) appear to have died. I assume this is a toolserver issue, since they all died at once, but the IP addresses aren't blocked, so I was checking to see if there was something you could look into. None of the bots have made any edits in the last 50 minutes. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, never mind, they seem to have just come back online. Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Return of Mykungfu Sockpuppet

[edit]

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mykungfu (6th)
Hi AC--After some time off, the MKF sockpuppet appears to have returned--even assuming good faith, his/her edits are the same, and he immediately went to the same edits he left when blocked before. After attempting to use several open proxies to circumvent the blocks on his former accounts, he now appears to be editing from User:RobertOgleFan. I am just contacting admins like yourself that have had experience with MKF. -RoBoTamice 14:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 17 21 April 2008 About the Signpost

BLP deletion rules discussed amidst controversial AFD Threat made against high school on Wikipedia, student arrested 
Global login, blocking features developed WikiWorld: "Disruptive technology" 
News and notes: Wikimania security, German print Wikipedia, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Monthly updates of styleguide and policy changes WikiProject Report: The Simpsons 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Greetings...

[edit]

Hello, Alphachimp, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".
I (and the rest of us here, too!) hope you like it here and decide to stay!
Happy editing! Austin T. Koeckeritz 18:02, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 18 2 May 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Wikimedia Board to expand, restructure Arbitrator leaves Wikipedia 
Bot approvals group, checkuser nominations briefly held on RfA WikiWorld: "World domination" 
News and notes: Board elections, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Did You Know ... Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 19 9 May 2008 About the Signpost

Sister Projects Interview: Wikiversity WikiWorld: "They Might Be Giants" 
News and notes: Board elections, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Featured content from schools and universities Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 20 12 May 2008 About the Signpost

Explicit sexual content draws fire Sighted revisions introduced on the German Wikipedia 
Foundation receives copyright claim from church Board to update privacy policy, adopts data retention policy 
Update on Citizendium Board candidacies open through May 22 
Two wiki events held in San Francisco Bay Area New feature enables users to bypass IP blocks 
WikiWorld: "Tony Clifton" News and notes: Autoconfirmed level, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Changes at Featured lists 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:11, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 21 19 May 2008 About the Signpost

Pro-Israeli group's lobbying gets press, arbitration case Board elections: Voting information, new candidates 
Sister Projects Interview: Wikibooks WikiWorld: "Hodag" 
News and notes: Russian passes Swedish, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Good article milestone Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 22 26 May 2008 About the Signpost

Board elections: Candidate questions Single User Login opt-in for all users 
Community-related news sources grow WikiWorld: "Tomcat and Bobcat" 
News and notes: Wikimedia DE lawsuit, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Featured sounds Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted GraalOnline article maliciously recreated secretly in german...

[edit]

The GraalOnline article that was deleted due to WP:WEB, NPOV, and other issues noted in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/GraalOnline has been secretly reposted at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graal_Online , with little to no changes except for the language translation... The English page was nearly unanimously voted for removal and barring any significant changes should not be allowed back in any language... Vipercat (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 23 2 June 2008 About the Signpost

Board elections open WikiWorld: "Facial Hair" 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 24 9 June 2008 About the Signpost

Board elections continue WikiWorld: "Triskaidekaphobia" 
News and notes: Military media mention, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Main page day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 25 23 June 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Board elections completed; results forthcoming WikiWorld: "John Hodgman" 
News and notes: Military media mention, milestones Dispatches: How Wikipedia's 1.0 assessment scale has evolved 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 26 26 June 2008 About the Signpost

Ting Chen wins 2008 Board Election ArbCom's BLP "special enforcement" remedy proves controversial 
Global group discussions in progress WikiWorld: "Raining animals" 
News and notes: Foundation hires, milestones Dispatches: Reliable sources in content review processes 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.

[edit]
The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 27 30 June 2008 About the Signpost

Private arbitration case criticized, vacated Other ArbCom announcements reviewed in wake of controversy 
Statistical model identifies potential RfA candidates WikiWorld: "Mike Birbiglia and the Perils of Sleepwalking" 
News and notes: Board votes released, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Sources in biology and medicine Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removed from Signpost spamlist

[edit]

Hi! I'm Ral315, editor-in-chief of the Wikipedia Signpost. It appears that you have not edited in at least a few months. To avoid spamming your talk page any further, should you be on leave, your name has been removed from the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to continue receiving the Signpost on your talk page, please leave a note on my talk page to that effect, and I will restore your name, and keep you on the list indefinitely. Ral315 (talk) 06:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete my account

[edit]

I wasn't sure who to ask or where to ask so here goes.

I was simply wondering if you could please permanently delete my account on wikipedia. Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romanmelnik (talkcontribs) 07:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Megladon

[edit]

Why did you delete megladon article????!!!! I needed it for a school report!

David Soyer

[edit]

David played in the Navy Band, not the Army Band. He tells me he started as a Musician First Class, and left as Second Class. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.130.49 (talk) 23:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is Alpachimp Kidding or is He an Asshole?

[edit]

"Imagine a room with 1000 tiny monkeys with 1000 huge typewriters. Now imagine hundreds upon thousands of those rooms, pushed together more tightly than any architect could possibly conceive. Now imagine a single head monkey to lead them all - sorting, filing, and publishing the work of the many monkeys and many typewriters. That monkey is the Alphachimp, and he welcomes you to Wikipedia."

Are you this narcissistic in real life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.104.81 (talk) 05:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

block this IP 70.158.32.194 again?

[edit]

User talk:70.158.32.194 gets warned for vandalism multiple times every month. You temporarily blocked this IP once before. Please take a look. Thanks. 158.228.211.10 (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nanos Valaoritis

[edit]

The article on Nanos Valaoritis was first written by me. I now notice at the bottom of the article under References that a claim is made for the article having originally appeared in the Greek version of Wikipedia and translated from that source. This is not true. If it appears in the Greek version, then that version was translated from my initial English version. -- Michael Haag —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelhaag (talkcontribs) 14:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nanos Valaoritis

[edit]

Further to my remark about the erroneous Reference, I have now deleted the false statement that the Valaorites article was translated from the Greek. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelhaag (talkcontribs) 14:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AIV helperbot

[edit]

Hi Alphachimp! Could you take a look at a suggestion for the AIV helperbot? Thanks - Kingpin13 (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ultralingua

[edit]

You deleted an article about Ultralingua some time ago. I was not the author and never saw the article in question. I have prepared a new article about Ultralingua, based on similar articles about proprietary software, that have not been deleted. Please review this article before I post it, and leave a message on Kudpung (talk) 09:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)my talk page.[reply]

It's in my sandbox at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kudpung/Sandbox

Many thanks.Kudpung (talk) 09:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi, if you are who asked about penultimate as opposed to final, yes, they were all on the NEXT to last shows, all of them had special shows put aside for their lasts, and the penultimate ones were the ones that (I guess cause it went down that way with Carson) they have chosen to book people to "serenade"

-Marc

Mshaiman (talk) 21:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: socionics

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Socionics Tcaudilllg (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday!

[edit]
Hey, Alphachimp. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
-- I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 14:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Account request has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. GrooveDog (talk) 01:45, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletions

[edit]

This delete (which you beat me to by just a couple seconds) probably should have been as "attack page" or some such, rather than "patent nonsense" (which it wasn't). It's not a huge deal, especially with such obvious vandalism as this, but it does help to keep the deletion logs organized in case something ever comes up. Thanks, rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 04:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True. Good catch. I'll mark that as such in the future. :) alphachimp 04:34, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Reconsideration of Deletion / Canasta

[edit]

I would like to suggest that the deletion of the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canasta_(band) be reconsidered. Below is information supporting the criteria for notability (music) as well as additional supporting documentation.

1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries...

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=10:kcfwxz95ldse
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7205498
http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/music/chicagomusic/1071188,sound072408.article
http://www.canastamusic.com/webapps/popups/contentpopup.php?content=/press/2005-06-Trib.xhtml
http://www.canastamusic.com/webapps/popups/contentpopup.php?content=/press/2005-11-17-TheOnion.xhtml
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/canasta_we_were_set_up/
http://www.popmatters.com/shorttakes/2004_12_26_archive.shtml
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/review/canasta-we-were-mixed-up/
http://www.breakthruradio.com/index.php?b=artist.php?id=159

7. Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.

From the above Sun-Times article, by Jim Derogatis...

"Though its popularity can be traced to the indie duo Cardinal in the early ’90s, the ork- (short for “orchestral-”) pop genre has produced some of the best bands in the Chicago underground in the last decade, starting with Yum-Yum and continuing with the Scotland Yard Gospel Choir, the 1900’s and Head of Femur. Canasta certainly deserves a place on this list..."

10. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article.) A link to the trailer for Diminished Capacity (IFC Films), starring Matthew Broderick and Alan Alda, which features Canasta's "Slow Down Chicago" (it comes in about halfway through)... http://ifcfilms.com/viewFilm.htm?filmId=776


6. Is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles, or an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians. Canasta's vocalist is a member of The Scotland Yard Gospel Choir, who's already featured on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotland_Yard_Gospel_Choir)...

Other information of note...

Canasta was involved in Barack Obama's online campaign: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=E6CD48AEE4C3053E

And was invited to join Barack Obama at Chicago’s gorgeous Riviera Theatre (capacity: 2500), as part of a fundraiser for his Democratic Primary bid: http://www.canastamusic.com/images/photoalbum/ChangeRocksDecember7,2007/photo/0 http://www.canastamusic.com//shows/flyers/2007-12-07-ObamaPoster2.jpg

Several television commercials that made use of our music, including Mission Federal Credit Unions and Oklahoma City Community College, all viewable here... http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=8532266C07419B76

  • Canasta has performed for sizeable audiences all over the country, including stops at the SXSW Festival (Austin), CMJ Music Marathon (NYC), CMJ Rock Hall Fest (Cleveland) and Tomorrow Never Knows Fest (Chicago).
  • In their hometown, they have headlined the legendary Metro, held the esteemed “Practice Space” residency at Schubas and played sold-out gigs at Double Door, Empty Bottle, Subterranean and Schubas.
  • They’ve shared stages with artists such as Wilco, Clap Your Hands Say Yeah, Macy Gray, Grizzly Bear, Kaiser Chiefs, Sloan, Devotchka, Voxtrot, Menomena, White Rabbits, The Lemonheads, The Delgados, The Dears, The Posies, Jeremy Enigk, The Clientele, The New Amsterdams, Crooked Fingers, American Music Club, Longwave, Earlimart, Califone, Annuals, etc.
  • Both of their self-released CD's, including the Find the Time EP, as well as the full-length, We Were Set Up, have sold out of their first 1,000 copies.
  • While preparing demos for their sophomore follow‐up, Canasta invited talented friends to remix and re-imagine their debut record’s songs, resulting in We Were Mixed Up. All in all, it’s nearly 100 minutes of music, re‐imagined by some of the most talented folks Chicago has to offer, including members of Office, The Hood Internet, Brighton MA, Allá and others. The album is available as a free digital download from their website.
  • Canasta's debut full-length was recorded with Ted Cho (Poi Dog Pondering) at North Branch Studio, home to Smog and Jeff Tweedy, and mastered by Mike Hagler (Wilco, The New Pornographers). The album featured guest appearances from vocalist Edith Frost, upright bassist Barry Phipps (The Coctails), trumpeter Max Crawford (Archer Prewitt), pedal‐steel guitarist Steve Dorocke (Freakwater) and cellist Alison Chesley (ex‐Verbow).

--Gouache23 (talk) 16:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting your orders sir....

[edit]

My name is Arun.....I have applied for auto wiki browser.....Pls verify....Last time u disapproved.....So pls evaluate and reply...Any answers welcome.... tc.... ARUNKUMAR P.R (talk · contribs) 09:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alphachimpbot

[edit]

Hey there Alphachimp,

i noticed that your bot isnt running. I was hoping you could start 'er up agian. There appears to be quite a bit of work to be done. Thanks,

Tim1357 (talk) 02:28, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I don't want to consume needless Wikimedia resources though. What is the current consensus on "subst"ing templates? alphachimp 16:34, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well I'm for it, but just me does not count as consensus. You had consensus at the BRFA right? That should still "count" as enough right? Tim1357 (talk) 18:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Review of indefinite rangeblocks. –xenotalk 17:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]
Hey, Alphachimp. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
-- Sainsf<^> (talk) 16:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you love it and sign my Guestbook! --Sainsf<^> (talk) 16:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Armbrust Talk Contribs 22:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Man-Faye

[edit]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination)

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination). --Gwern (contribs) 11:13 4 August 2010 (GMT) 11:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Public domain and Wikipedia.

[edit]

Wikipedia and public domain for upcoming edits.

[edit]

Please discuss seriously about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Wikipedia_and_public_domain_for_upcoming_edits. Rishikeshan (talk)ERROR: Please enter the username parameter when using the {{Talkback}} template - thus {{Talkback|<username>}}.

Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Request an account/Administrators during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- DQ (t) (e) 00:12, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translating a page

[edit]

Thanks for the welcome Alphachimp. Can you look at the new page I created and let me know if I did it right? It's a translation of an existing page in the Catalan Wikipedia (Viquipedia), plus I added a few references.

Here's my page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lizcastro/Toni_Strubell_i_Trueta

And here's the original: http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toni_Strubell_i_Trueta

What do you think?

Lizcastro (talk) 11:41, 19 October 2010 (UTC) Liz[reply]

Removing Betty Martini's info--Mission Possible...your own agenda?

[edit]

Why would you possibly choose to remove all of Betty's info she's compiled to inform the public of the dangers of excitotoxins? Plus so much more of her hard work to serve to keep the public awake in order to guard their own health? Could it be that you have fallen in line with the agendas of Big Pharma and the Global Elite for population control? If her name is mentioned anywhere, so should her mission be. The fact that you've deleted her page on this is suspect.

Please consider a re-post, and thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.12.16.4 (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

[edit]

thank you :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.254.33.148 (talk) 02:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) alphachimp 21:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]
Hey, Alphachimp. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Miguel AG (talk) 11:48, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

[edit]
Hello, Alphachimp. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 15:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:81st St. IND.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:81st St. IND.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GrandStIND6thAveLine.JPG listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GrandStIND6thAveLine.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Payzone

[edit]

I notice Payzone article was previously deleted by yourself, am I okay to re-add it if the text is compliant? RoyalBlueStuey (talk) 10:25, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment noted, thanks. alphachimp 13:17, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

legend you are — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trotter23 (talkcontribs) 10:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of improvement

[edit]

A substantial part of the article,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_impetus

concerns a "tunnel experiment," as proposed by Galileo in his Dialogo.

The article would clearly benefit by having it pointed out that, although it could be, the experiment has as yet not been performed. In its original form the idea is to have a tunnel dug through the Earth so that a test object ("cannonball") can be dropped into it. This is, of course, impossible. But the same physical principles would be revealed by using laboratory-sized massive bodies instead. The experiment could be performed in an Earth-based laboratory or in an orbiting satellite.

Articles that discuss these possibilities and present further reasons for doing the experiment can be found at:

http://astroreview.com/issue/2012/article/interior-solution-gravity-experiment

and

http://astroreview.com/issue/2012/article/the-direction-of-gravity

I have no experience contributing to Wiki, but feel this issue is important enough to learn how to do so, if this message is not sufficient to make it happen. Please advise. Thank you.

Richard Benish — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.63.30 (talk) 22:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]
Happy Birthday from the Birthday Committee

Wishing Alphachimp a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!

Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

₫ӓ₩₳ Talk to Me. Email Me. 06:30, 29 July 2012 (UTC) [reply]Aaeekkssoouullii (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotect

[edit]

Hi there, can you please unprotect my user page now: User:Christiaan. Thanks.

Unfortunately, Alphachimp hasn't been active for awhile and may not see this anytime soon. However, if you'd like me to unprotect the page, please let me know. Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Travel Channel Producer Seeking info on the Source of the photo of Austen Leslie

[edit]

Hi Jason!

My name is Suzy Beck, I'm a producer for a show called Food Paradise that airs on the Travel Channel. I'm currently working on an episode all about Fried Chicken and we featured Jacques-Imo's as one of our "Fried Chicken Paradises." Obviously we can't talk bout Jacques-Imo's fried chicken without mentioning Austin Leslie! I'm looking for a photo of Austin Leslie to use in the piece and I found the photo that you posted on Wikipedia. Travel Channel is really strict with permissions to use photos, and I noticed that Jason Perlow is credited as the source - is he the photographer? If he is the photographer, do you have a way that I can get in contact with him to see if he will sign a material agreement allowing us to use his photo? Please feel free to email me at suzy.beck@prometheuspix.com and please also feel free to pass my email address align to Jason Perlow.

I hope to hear back from you soon!

Kindest regards,

~Suzy~

Suzy Beck Producer Food Paradise for the Travel Channel Prometheus Entertainment suzy.beck@prometheuspix.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.39.129.210 (talk) 19:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A warning? Not sure why?

[edit]

I came on Wikipedia and got this message:

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to "Cascade Festival of African Films", you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Alphachimp talk 02:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure what this is about, as I have no idea what that topic is or why I've been accused of messing with it. I think you've made a mistake. I VERY RARELY edit ANYTHING on this site, and even then it's only been articles about heavy metal music. This has me baffled. Please let me know what's going on. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.117.76 (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC) I'm not sure what this is about, as I have no idea what that topic is or why I've been accused of messing with it. I think you've made a mistake. I VERY RARELY edit ANYTHING on this site, and even then it's only been articles about heavy metal music. This has me baffled. Please let me know what's going on. Thanks.[reply]

As you can see from the timestamp, that warning was issued in 2006. Six years ago, someone else was presumably assigned to the IP address that you have now. So the warning wasn't really addressed to you, and you can disregard it. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 04:35, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still alive, thanks!! alphachimp 02:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely protected user subpages

[edit]

Hi. The following pages are currently indefinitely protected:

These protections are five or six years old now. Could you please unprotect these pages? --MZMcBride (talk) 20:47, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for bringing this to my attention! alphachimp 18:30, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You deleted PASTE; this is a polite notification to say that PASTE has been recreated by me as a redirect to Paste (magazine).--Launchballer 17:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i need some help with Vandalism on WBIR and WTNZ's articles an IP user keeps removing people from the news team on both articles i have contacted WBIR and the people they still work for the stations. ACase0000 (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

[edit]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:54, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment noted, thank you! alphachimp 18:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good to have you back - is your return permanent?--Launchballer 19:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

[edit]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hatzic deleted long ago, as I just found out

[edit]

Hi, after long years since making it (I think it was me, maybe it was already there), I was going to start a community page and a corresponding dab per [wiki-search below the available redlink]

06:13, 20 February 2007 Alphachimp (talk | contribs) deleted page Hatzic (Deleting page per CSD A1: Short article that provides little or no context.)

Many BC local and community articles were just stubs at the time; did it not have a stub tag? I still find the occasional one that doesn't. It might not have had one maybe? And a simple google search would have come up with the major community and area of the Fraser Valley that this is, with a high school, a native archaeo site and museum, lake and adjoining prairie and mountain all taking their name from "Hatzic", which was the name used for the people of the locality; given it's an obscenity for the male member, referring to a root gathered in the area, what their actual name in Halkomelem was I don't know; unless in the days it wasn't an obscenity per cultural changes in times past and was in fact the name of the group. They are linked west to the Kwantlens, as I was recently told by another user who's steeped in local lore (he's 84)

The primary topic of that title is a major topic, i.e. the community, and has numerous related dabs; rather than deleted it you should have tagged it for expansion and improvement. Or perhaps contacted the author; if it was me I was around Wikipedia for a while already and had made many community/locality titles for BC, this may have been one of them.

I'll be recreating it later on today or tomorrow; a bit stunned it's not there, it's a major neighbourhood of Mission, British Columbia, an OMI mission school located there is the town's namesake, and one of the most historica locations in British Columbia for a number of reasons.Skookum1 (talk) 08:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What was the reason for you to delete the above non profit charitable society page , can you kindly restore it please.(Raafat (talk) 01:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC))[reply]

FYI - since you've previously edited the article. Bazj (talk) 11:50, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested edit

[edit]

My name is Master Phillip Redmond. I'm one of the senior students under Grandmaster William Cheung. When I did a wiki search I found that there was information missing. First of all. My name and the other senior Master, Keith Mazza in the U.S. weren't mentioned. Also, William Cheung has changed the name of his Traditional Wing Chun Kung Fu Association to the Global Traditional Wing Chun Kung Fu Association (GTWCKFA). I made the corrections and someone named Chrisw80 deleted them. I made the corrections again and he deleted them again saying that I needed a secondary source. I understand that part so I sent him a message showing a video of the ceremony I performed with William Cheung to become the second of only two people in the U.S. to have had the honor. My updates were still deleted. What can I do to fix this? Sifupr (talk) 15:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sifupr, What Chrisw80 told you is correct. What are needed are reliable secondary sources (see WP:RS for more information on reliable sources). If the information you want to add is commonly known, it is usually fairly easy to find a source with a some online searching. Also, when you use {{edit COI}}, it's helpful to put the request on the talk page of the article you would like changed, that way is is clear where you want the changes done. TimothyJosephWood 16:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William Cheung

[edit]

You know what, I guess there's nothing I can do. When people who know the facts about William Cheung read his wikipedia page they'll just have to rub their heads. Have a great day. Phillip Redmond — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sifupr (talkcontribs) 16:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Still alive! :) alphachimp 00:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You've barely done anything at all on Wikipedia since 2010, and nothing since 2014. Why don't you head over to WP:BN and resign your adminship?  — Scott talk 17:08, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for your opinion. At this time I intend to become more active in the near future. If you have any specific concerns, I'd be happy to discuss. Thanks! alphachimp 12:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kenny Vaughan

[edit]

Hey, I was wondering why you deleted a page on producer/songwriter/guitarist Kenny Vaughan? He's done a substantial amount of work in music, TV and film and was just curious. [1] [2] Thanks! Md massimino (talk) 20:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Extended confirmed protection

[edit]

Hello, Alphachimp. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

[edit]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

[edit]

Hi Alphachimp.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Alphachimp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your inactive bot(s)

[edit]

Hello Alphachimp. We currently show that you are the operator on file for at least one bot account that appears to be inactive. Please see the discussion and list of bots here: Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard#Inactive bots over 5 years. If you are no longer operating your bot, no action is required - your bot will be marked as retired and have the bot flag removed. Should your bot be retired and you wish to revive it in the future, please request bot authorization at WP:BRFA. If you are still in control of your bot (including knowing its hopefully strong password) and wish to maintain the bot flag, please sign the table on the linked discussion. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 14:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirateSchwede66K6kaEaldgythFerretCyberpower678Mz7PrimefacDodger67
BriangottsJeremyABU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
  • Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
  • The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday

[edit]
Wishing Alphachimp a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 08:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unban proposal for 'CarryMinati' from blacklist

[edit]

CarryMinati has been identified by YouTube as the 2nd top independent Indian creator in 2016. (http://gadgets.ndtv.com/internet/news/youtube-rewind-2016-google-lists-top-india-and-global-trending-videos-1635664)

He has 1.5 million subscribers which is a notable amount. X4rid (talk) 17:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Alphachimp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time, and that you have not been inactive from administrative tasks for a five year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. Further, following a community discussion in March of 2018, administrators suspended for inactivity who have not had any logged administrative activity for five years will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Alphachimp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Alphachimp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mike McDonnell

[edit]

Hello, I'm creating an article on politicans and I want to make this article on a Nebraskian politican that has the same name. Did you delete an article about a politican with that name 12-13 years ago or was that a different Mike McDonnell or is that a different Mike McDonnell? I don't know if you remember that far or not but I just wanted to check before I went to create the article.

Dillon251992 (talk) 20:43, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

[edit]
Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:39, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

[edit]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Response

[edit]

Thanks for the info! alphachimp 10:48, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NYCPT misses you!!!

[edit]

Hey there! Hope all is well with you A-chimp! (I used to go by Imdanumber1, but have dropped the name to go with something less arrogant). I know it's been a while since you've been on Wikipedia and even longer since you've been on the NYCPT WikiProject, but you're always welcome to come back and help out. Have a nice day! —LRG5784 (talk · contribs · email) 12:55, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Woohooo

[edit]
Hey, Alphachimp. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Mjs1991 (talk) 06:10, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message! Still alive alphachimp 01:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still here

[edit]

I'm still alive, thanks! alphachimp 18:41, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

[edit]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

[edit]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Badcleanup

[edit]

Template:Badcleanup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New administrator activity requirement

[edit]

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

  1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
  2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:11, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still here, thanks

[edit]

Still here alphachimp 00:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:50, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:59, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux Talk 03:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]