User talk:Asocos

Hello, Asocos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
Check out some of these pages:
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 02:35, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?

Use the main sandbox or create your own personal sandbox to experiment.

How do I create an article?

See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.

How do I create citations?

Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:

==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Nature

You should help the enviorment Asocos (talk) 02:02, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metric

I suggest you learn more about physics Asocos (talk) 02:07, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

István Varró moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, István Varró, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mori Calliope fan talk 05:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raoella moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Raoella, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Os ari us 07:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at WP:AIV, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Even when reporting a user to AIV, you need to add your signature. Also, you copy the format in the hidden comment and paste it lower on the page. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reporting a user to WP:AIV for a single edit they made to Draft:Sandbox. Per what Widr said, it's stale/declined. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 19:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Asocos I agree with User:Blaze Wolf on what Widr Said It is definitley Stale, There has only been 1 edit on Draft:Sandbox and it is not considered as vandalism. Chip3004 (talk) 19:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vita Christi, you may be blocked from editing. I don't know if this is a result of your lack of competence or blatant vandalism, but it's disruptive and your edit summary was entirely untrue. PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. stop re-adding this - it was already declined and it's clearly not vandalism PICKLEDICAE🥒 19:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

page: {unblock|reason=I did not see the warning Asocos (talk) 19:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asocos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Did not see the warning, also it is vandalisim, it clearly stated to not edit the top part, and the person I was trying to report did edit the top part Asocos (talk) 19:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to address your vandalism. Yamla (talk) 19:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asocos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your decline reason was vandalism and I did not do vandalism Asocos (talk) 19:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You apparently still believe that Moldoveanulist's edit to the sandbox was vandalism. It was not, and you are misunderstanding Wikipedia's vandalism policy. I am declining your unblock request as it doesn't actually address the issues with your editing that led to this block. DanCherek (talk) 20:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Look your edits at WP:AIV was disruptive, and User:Yamla's Decline wasn't vandalism either, your were blocked for Distruptive Editing. Your reports at WP:AIV was also Stale Chip3004 (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Distrupive editing and vandalism are not the same thing, also I did not see the warnings Asocos (talk) 19:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And the thing I did a vita Christi, I thought I was fixing an error because I did not know how the error checker worked Asocos (talk) 20:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'm afraid you lack the competence to edit an encyclopedia. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asocos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because I did not see the warnings, the thing I did at vita Christi is not vandalism, and even know My edit summary was false, I thought i was fixing an error there Asocos (talk) 20:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time please. See above. DanCherek (talk) 20:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asocos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not saying that was vandalism In my second-last edit, I was saying that I did not do vandalism, and the thing I did at vita Christi is not vandalism, and even know My edit summary was false, I thought i was fixing an error there, Due to not knowing how the error checker works, also I did not see the warnings Asocos (talk) 4:16 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

This makes no sense. Please review your edits. This edit with a false edit summary-- you could not have believed you were fixing an error. Please review attempts to coach you on this page. Please describe how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you'd make. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did not know I was going to get blocked Asocos (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If i saw the warnings I would of stopped doing it, but i did not see the warning, I thought I was fixing an error because it was highlighted red Asocos (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asocos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First I thought their was an error in vita Christi because it was highlighted red, then when I was repeatedly reporting, I did not see the warning because I was too distracted with well… reporting, and I thought it was vandalism, because it said to not edit the top row, and the person I was trying to report did Asocos (talk) 22:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your comments since your block make clear that you do not understand how editing Wikipedia works and, more importantly, do not understand that it is your job to learn how editing Wikipedia works if you wish to edit it. We do not expect perfection, but we expect people to know what they do not know, and to be able to communicate their problems and ask for help. I have extended this block to indefinite. I am open to unblocking if you can explain how you will improve in your understanding of how to edit Wikipedia. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 22:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I do know how the error checker works now Asocos (talk) 22:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I did before I got blocked Asocos (talk) 22:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But not when I thought I was fixing an error at vita Christi Asocos (talk) 22:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asocos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can improve in my understanding by testing in my sandbox, and using Wikipedia help pages for wikitext Asocos (talk) 22:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

2 open unblocks; see other one below slakr^\ talk / 08:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By the way my sandbox is at user:asocos/sandbox Asocos (talk) 22:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get unblocked, I did not know me consistently reporting somebody would lead to this, I will only increase my understanding of editing wikipedia, if I can use it in my sandbox Asocos (talk) 23:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Asocos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won’t do the things that got me blocked, if I get unblocked Asocos (talk) 20:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Reading our guide to improving articles.
Picking any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
  - and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. slakr^\ talk / 08:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

~~Revoke TPA? Maybe WP:SO? WP:CIR.~~ -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will only learn how to edit if I can use it to edit in my sandbox, which is at user:asocos/sandbox Asocos (talk) 23:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I get unblocked, I promise I won’t redo the stuff that led to me being blocked again. Asocos (talk) 23:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. What exactly will you not do? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:54, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Report people countless times, and use the error checker incorrectly Asocos (talk) 11:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will also see the warnings so I will not get blocked again Asocos (talk) 11:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I advise you to read WP:SO and follow what it says. In case you aren't going to read it, you should probably wait 6 months before you request you be unblocked. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean, "error checker?" -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you do into advance tools, there is this thing that checkers for errors Asocos (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Willing to unblock, but not by myself.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With who? Asocos (talk) 06:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably another admin. Deepfriedokra is willing to unblock you, but I think they'd like the opinion of another admin before doing so. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:06, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asocos, if you are unblocked, I am willing to be your mentor and teach you how to properly edit Wikipedia without getting blocked. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 12:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

user:tamzin hors de combat at the moment, perhaps another reviewer will offer an opinion. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose an unblock. I don't think that pledging to do some sandbox editing is going to fundamentally address the concerns that led to the block, and I don't really see evidence that those issues have been fully understood. --Blablubbs (talk) 14:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Blablubbs: should you post that to the (newly restore) AN thread? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Deepfriedokra: I couldn't find anything by ctrl+f-ing Asocos at AN just now, but I'm on mobile and have fat fingers, so I might have missed it – could you link me to the thread? --Blablubbs (talk) 14:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
C~~ertainly! It is here -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)~~ I R Stoopid[reply]
Never mind I'm on the wrong page -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not just to do sandbox editing I will use the sandbox to help me get better at editing wikipedia Asocos (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators did not give me the warnings 🤬 Asocos (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed users did Asocos (talk) 00:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators are not in charge of warning users. They usually block users who misbehave, while extended confirmed users usually end up warning users. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get unblocked? Asocos (talk) 11:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked for Trying to report somebody Asocos (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:István Varró

Hello, Asocos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:István Varró, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raoella

Hello, Asocos. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raoella, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:István Varró

Hello, Asocos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "István Varró".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raoella

Hello, Asocos. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raoella".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:35, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]