User talk:Boutboul
Welcome
genetic studies on jews - khazar
[edit]I wasn't sure if I should reply on your page. If this is bad Wiki etiquette, just delete the next couple of lines.
- Dear Lastexpofan, I have seen that you changed some sentence in "genetic studies on jews". I would like to have your opinion about an argument I have with Jayjg about the possibility of some Khazar origin of Ashkenazim Talk:Genetic studies on Jews. We go round in circle and I think we need an external point of view. Could you tell if this kind of sentence could be added in the lead: "chromosomes in Ashkenazim may represent vestiges of the mysterious Khazars"?--Boutboul (talk) 07:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- By the way why did you remove the extract from D. Goldstein ?--Boutboul (talk) 07:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Do you mean "And there is that troubling Y chromosome that is so common in the ashkenazi Levites but seemingly nowhere else to be found. I can not claim the evidence proves a Khazari connection.
But it does raise the possibility, I confess that, although I can not prove it yet, the idea does now seem to me plausible, if not likely?" I removed that because it was in a note and seemed unsourced, but if it's from a source I'm fine with it.
- I don't know if I could get involved in that discussion between you and JayJG because I'm really busy right now, but maybe I could get involved later.--Lastexpofan (talk) 03:21, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
the italian/ tuscan/ southern european component
[edit]Michael, thanks for the message. I am a little uncomfortable with the deletion, but I think I can accept it. On the other hand if you also feel uncomfortable with it, I think in principle we should look for a compromise sentence? Can you tell me your position? Is it the same? I am not 100% clear on what you think.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:30, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Conversion table for Y chromosome haplogroups for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conversion table for Y chromosome haplogroups is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversion table for Y chromosome haplogroups until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 13:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Boutboul. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Bonjour cher monsieur, je suis un ex directeur de recherche à l'INRAE qui écrit un ouvrage et aimerait discuter avec vous de la génétique des populations juives, sachant que vous êtes le principal contributeur de l'artice Wikipédia concernant ce sujet. Merci de votre attention ! jacques.barnouin(at)free.fr Jacques barnouin (talk) 22:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
- Bonjour,
- Désolé pour ma réponse tardive, je viens de voir votre message. Je serai ravis de discuter avec vous mais je tiens à signaler que je n'ai aucune compétence dans le domaine mis à part le fait d'avoir pris le temps de lire les très nombreux articles sur le sujet.
- Cordialement,
- Michael Boutboul Michael Boutboul (talk) 13:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fondation Maeght, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calder. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.