User talk:Celestechang

Hello, Celestechang, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:00, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Frederick Douglass edit

Hi. I see that you changed the lede on the Douglass article. I was wondering why you deleted "He stood as a living counter-example to slaveholders' arguments that slaves did not have the intellectual capacity to function as independent American citizens." I've made the Douglass article a pet project of mine (I live 3 miles from where he was born). I wrote that sentence.

I made major edits to the lede some months ago, as it had been tagged for some time as having an inadequate lede. I'd never edited a lede of a major article before, and I tried my best to give an overview and to make a powerful argument as to why Douglass' life is important for people to know. That's why I put that sentence in. I would appreciate it (sincerely) if you can explain to me why you think it does not belong in the article. I know Wikipedia articles are not supposed to be original material, but you can't cite every sentence. If lack of citation is your only concern, I will search for a source for this statement.

Bloody Viking (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Skype toolbar formatting

Can you please take a look at this edit and sort it out? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:00, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dont know how that odd formatting appeared but i fixed it. cheers. Celestechang (talk) 23:10, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bacterial classification

Please see Bacteria#Classification_and_identification for a modern view of bacterial relationships. They are no longer divided into simply two groups, since DNA evidence shows their pylogeny is much more complex than that. --EncycloPetey (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]