User talk:DareshMohan

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prema Qaidi (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NALBUM at this point in time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prema Qaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:36, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh hello, and hello again, DareshMohan.... I was just passing on DareshMohan's TP to leave a Barnstar and I see this. The subject will very likely never meet WP:NALBUM and for a perfectly good reason.....because it's a film. Consider having a second look, please. On a more general note, the fact that so many articles are declined by various reviewers with boilerplate messages is terribly ....how can I put it mildly? ...sad and demoralising! Generic reasons, not even the slightest effort to be specific, seem to be the rule. It gives the impression that some reviewers barely have a look at the page. Maybe you did and maybe they do but that's not the feeling I get when I read their short and dismissive comments, to be perfectly honest with you.Thank you. Mushy Yank (talk) 23:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mushy Yank: Perhaps consider how you approach people who make mistakes because I believe your comment to be far more demoralizing than a genuine mistake on my part, which I believe was based on having a number of tabs open at once and responding to the wrong one. Do you REALLY think this is the best way to approach someone about an issue? Things happen, but your attitude is what leads to a giant backlog instead of people making genuine efforts to help others. But, given your bad attitude, I suspect this will fall on deaf ears. @DareshMohan, I apologize about the mistake. I genuinely hope I have not deterred you, because I do appreciate your efforts to improve Wikipedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS, I will not be reviewing the article, I believe it's been implied I'm not competent enough to do so, so perhaps I'll take a break from reviewing drafts and helping with the backlog all together. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PPS, I reverted my decline of the draft, and I want to again apologize about the mistake Daresh. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh A bit surprised by your message. Did I imply you were incompetent? I certainly did not mean to. And was I rude and insulting in any way? If you perceived that in my message, that was not my intent and I'm sorry. I explained the comment you had left could give the impression that you had read the page too fast (I understand that was not the case, and you probably meant FILM not ALBUM? Sure, as I said, it may be the case, and if you say so, then it is, but that's not the effect the comment has (or might have), don't you agree?) and then, and for the main part of my message, I expanded to a more general issue: the lack of specific reasons present in many comments declining subsmissions (plural, absolutely nothing personal, I don't even know you) and the impression it can give. Do you disagree with my comment? Shouldn't comments declining an article be more specific? (My "attitude"? What attitude?) Mushy Yank (talk) 00:30, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mushy Yank: I do not review film articles, that is not my area of familiarity, and I only review the areas that I am comfortable with. It is clear as day that this is an article about a film, which is why I'm fairly confident it was an incorrect tab. You are welcome to join the AfC project to be the change you want to see or suggest changes there. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C. Prem Kumar has been accepted

C. Prem Kumar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Thilsebatti (talk) 05:40, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Poornachandra Mysore has been accepted

Poornachandra Mysore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:51, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neenyare (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neenyare and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:46, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article to the mainspace as it meets WP:NFILM with at least two reliable reviews and multiple sourced awards. Because IABot and Internet Archive's archiving service are down, could you please add archives via archive.today and/or ghostarchive? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:51, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excess c/e requests at the GOCE Requests page

Hi DareshMohan, I've removed your copy-edit requests for Pooja Gandhi and Kannum Kannum Kollaiyadithaal from the GOCE Requests page here (diff). I've done this because we only allow two requests per editor at any one time, and you already have two c/e requests pending (one is currently on hold). Please don't add any more c/e requests until at least one of your existing two has been processed. We enforce this rule so all requests have a fair chance of being copy-edited within a reasonable time. If you'd like any of these two articles to be copy-edited before Yugi Sethu and S. Sathyendra, you can replace these in situ with the new requests. Thanks for your patience and understanding. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:54, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I already removed the unsourced statements from the short articles Yugi Sethu and S. Sathyendra so they are in better state than the long articles Pooja Gandhi and Kannum Kannum Kolaiyadithaal. So if you dont mind can you replace my 1st 2 requests with my most recent requests. @Baffle gab1978: DareshMohan (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks your reply, and for removing the uncited material from those articles. Yes, I'll replace your two earlier requests with these latest two at their current positions, so you won't need to do anything else. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 20:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Baffle☿gab 20:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai Xpress

I have merged both Tamil and Hindi articles back to one form. Hamwal very crudely attempted to separate the two, resulting in the Tamil article resembling an older, half baked version. Let the RM stay, that will be consensus whether the two films should have separate articles or not. If the consensus is to split, let me and you do the bifurcation, not Hamwal. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murivu (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murivu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 16:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Please add multiple critical reviews from reliable sources and resubmit and let me know. This will be significant enough to pass notability. RangersRus (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ayesha Khan (Indian actress) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TornadoLGS (talk) 18:43, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sure. There was some "gossip" sources that she appeared in a film although there was no confirmation of ehat her role was. 18:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Billa Ranga (film) (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mims Mentor was:

Based on the current references, the article does have some sources that provide significant coverage of the film, which is crucial for establishing notability. I would suggest expanding the article with more independent, reliable, and significant coverage to ensure it meets the GNG standards for a stand-alone article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Billa Ranga (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— MimsMENTOR ^talk 18:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DareshMohan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — MimsMENTOR ^talk 18:12, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murivu (2024 film)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ArifVlog782 (talk) 09:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Approval Draft:Ijaaz Ebrahim (actor)

Hi User:DareshMohan,

Draft:Ijaaz Ebrahim (actor) Can you check this page and review it! ArifVlog782 (talk) 04:06, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:TOOEARLY, wait for more films. DareshMohan (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aahuthi

Is Aahuthi a remake of Rajavinte Makan (1986)? I did not come across that information in any Telugu articles on the film. The source cited on the latter page for remakes also does not mention Aahuthi. L5boat (talk) 06:58, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Srivin: do you know? DareshMohan (talk) 17:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the climax it is clear that it was remade from that film. Srivin (talk) 12:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool L5boat (talk) 13:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your work and your consistent efforts to improve things. . Mushy Yank (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prema Qaidi (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please find reliable sources with significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prema Qaidi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 01:19, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OTTPlay

Why are you removing it from articles saying it is non RS? Where is the consensus that it is not RS? It is owned by HT Media. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not RS per Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force#OTTPlay.com @Kailash29792: DareshMohan (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. It's a tragedy then that many journalists from other reliable sources like Thinkal Menon (Times of India) shifted to this. RangersRus, your perspective? Or should we reopen this discussion? Kailash29792 (talk) 08:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please reopen the discussion. RangersRus (talk) 12:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pranaya Geetham

Alas, it's been deleted. Did you ever find additional refs? Or give up on it? Hope there's at least one review of it on the net. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to Kokkaroko, it is a complete waste of time. Other than two passing mentions: [1] [2], there's nothing: [3]. @Kailash29792: DareshMohan (talk) 17:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muthukumar Wanted

Hello, DareshMohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muthukumar Wanted, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Y2K (2004 film) (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pokelego999 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Decline per past reviewers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Y2K (2004 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 15:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]