User talk:DougHill

Welcome. If I have posted on your talk page, please reply there. I'm watching that page. If you post here, I will reply here, so you should then watch this page. DougHill (talk) 23:49, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Hi there; friendly information. When you make a redirect there must be no space between the (#) and the (REDIRECT), or it doesn't work. I have corrected yours.--Anthony.bradbury 18:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ForgottenSins.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ForgottenSins.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ksfojohn.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ksfojohn.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thom Beck

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thom Beck, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 12:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lew Irwin

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Lew Irwin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 11:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Credgapppback.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Credgapppback.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 10:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note discussion

for the rename of satanic ritual abuse cases:

Talk:Satanic ritual abuse#Rename discussion WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 14:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Credibility Gap Shearer Lander McKean.jpg.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Credibility Gap Shearer Lander McKean.jpg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 18:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Lew Irwin

As the image is non-free, it must comply with our non-free content criteria. As the subject is still alive, it is replaceable with a free image (what's to stop someone taking one? Or donating one?) and so the image cannot be used. J Milburn (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if this is what you meant, but I have knocked the image down to thumbnail size in one of the other articles, and removed it from another. J Milburn (talk) 22:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Chroniclesteam.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chroniclesteam.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK. How's that? DougHill (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing my efforts.

Thanks for your comment on my efforts on the Multi-Level Marketing page. There are times I fell like the one sane person yelling in the insane wilderness.--BruceGrubb (talk) 18:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Country Turtle Records

Hi Doug, could you please be so kind as to have a look at this and tell me if I'm completely wrong in my opinion about that label's "notability" !?! StefanWirz (talk) 09:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Henry-Mancini.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Henry-Mancini.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the file is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Henry-Mancini.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Henry-Mancini.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.

On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please direct me to this "freely licensed media" so that we can use it instead? Thanks, DougHill (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I used the wrong message. I should have given the one below. The problem is that is fails our policy: WP:NFCI#3. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Henry-Mancini.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Henry-Mancini.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Henry-Mancini.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Henry-Mancini.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kathy Fields

No point in making a disambiguation page if neither person has an article. Let's not put the cart before the horse. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 03:44, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not divorced?

Hi, I don't get this and this. The article says that they separated in June 2010. What am I missing here? DVdm (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Gores are separated, not divorced, at least not yet. As the Tipper Gore article says, she is "the estranged wife of Al Gore" not his ex-wife. DougHill (talk) 23:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that explains. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 08:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Big Joe Turner may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Lee Hooker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boom Boom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Russ Hodges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bye Bye Baby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Theroux

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gary Theroux, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://collectorsfrenzy.com/Details.aspx?id=120615229214.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:52, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that site copied wikipedia instead of the other way around, as I explain at Talk:Gary Theroux. DougHill (talk) 23:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Theroux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Ford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thom Beck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KIIS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review or comment/vote (support/oppose) at my FA nomination for the article New York Dolls (album)? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nat King Cole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Aaron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Ksfojohn.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ksfojohn.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paper Doll (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Mills. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Craig Ferguson may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|2009 |pp=14-15}} Ferguson attended Muirfield Primary School and [[Cumbernauld High School]].{{sfn |Ferguson |2009 |p=31]] At age sixteen, Ferguson dropped out of Cumbernauld High School and began an apprenticeship to be

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: B & C chronology

Hello, DougHill. You have new messages at Talk:Ball 'n' Chain.
Message added 15:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to American rock may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Buddy Holly]] and with the greatest commercial success, Elvis Presley.<ref name=AllmusicRbilly>[{{Allmusic|class=explore|id=style/d187|title=Rockabilly |date-retrieved=06 August 2009}}</ref>{{sfn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dennis Prager, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PragerU

Hello. I am a little puzzled by your creation and use of the {{PragerU}} template. Could you please explain your goal with this? As I see it, the addition of a link to Prager U video lectures for every single lecturer potentially violates a host of policies and guidelines such as WP:ADV, WP:ELPOV, WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, and WP:PROMOTION. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Each edit was an improvement to its page (as all edits here should be). In addition, they generally consisted of adding a WP:RS, since what could be a better source on an academic than a short lecture from her? (This is always encouraged here, and is something that many pages are lacking.) Shouldn't every page about an academic or other writer include a lecture from her, if one is available? There is no rule against finding a good online source and making good use of it.

Anyway, if you have better sources, please add them. And if they also provide everything these lectures do, then please replace them. If we disagree about any of these, we can discuss them on their pages. DougHill (talk) 04:13, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm baffled by your response. You're not using these links to support any content, so their reliability is only tangentially relevant. Even if these lectures are "reliable" (for what?), we don't throw random reliable sources into "External links" sections. This strikes me as a violation of the policies and guidelines I've listed above. Please respond to them, and in addition please disclose any connection you have with Prager U. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no policy against finding a good website, and citing different pages on that site on the different and appropriate pages here. If you believe that this is not so, then you should please report me to the administrators. Otherwise, you should assume that my actions were the good faith edits that they were, and work with me on those pages to improve them. DougHill (talk) 21:22, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course there's no policy as you describe, but there is a policy against advertising and promotion, which appears to be the intention here. Why the hesitation to answering my question about your connection with Prager U? Are you serious about wanting me to report this to the administrators? I was thinking of taking a less extreme route (such as a non-admin noticeboard or an RFC) but if you insist I can go straight to ANI. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 04:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have an additional 24 hours to respond before I take this up on the noticeboards. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:11, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PragerU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:45, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ELN#Linking to Prager University

You've lost me with your weird reference to "TNTFNOT." You seem like a smart guy. What's so difficult to understand about the concept of violating multiple policies/guidelines at the same time? --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 07:25, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We've found the appropriate forum. So if you have questions, please ask on that forum, and I'll respond there. Please save this page for required notices. DougHill. Je suis Charlie. (talk) 04:26, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the link that you reinstated to Dennis Prager per WP:ELBURDEN. It's extremely doubtful that there will be any consensus for inclusion at this point given that the relevant policies/guidelines are being ignored or misinterpreted in the inclusion comments so far. --Ronz (talk) 19:14, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I've removed it from Kenneth Meshoe. Please stop. --Ronz (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please reply to my comments on the ELN or TdD? I will wait for your comments there before proceeding. DougHill. Je suis Charlie. (talk) 19:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you deny a connection to Prager University? Alakzi (talk) 02:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dennis Prager, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Zucker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anthony M. Esolen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dark Ages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:PragerU

Template:PragerU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 18:42, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, DougHill. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NoCruelerTyrannies.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NoCruelerTyrannies.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DougHill. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FAC: Forca Bruta

I recall you from the Frank Zappa talk page, and your edits to other music articles, and I have been considering asking someone since the FAC stagnated. Can you offer comments or review? Dan56 (talk) 04:33, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DougHill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, DougHill. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Philosopher nicknames) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Philosopher nicknames.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice article!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 01:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Britishfinance for your kind words. If you (or any editor) has any opinion about this article, please share it at WP:Articles for deletion/Philosopher nicknames while you can. DougHill (talk) 03:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Philosopher nicknames for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philosopher nicknames is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosopher nicknames until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RL0919 (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Country Walk case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Rosenthal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Country Walk case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Penthouse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allen Estrin (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Little seems to have been addressed or changed since the AFD. Few of the sources are coverage of him.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Allen Estrin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Allen Estrin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DougHill! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bryan Callen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schooled (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Country Walk case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brad Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion on the Line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KGIL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allen Estrin (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:

Actually the notability is already proven. What you need is to improve the format (like more on his personal life), improve your tone and make it more encyclopedeic (don't be too casual) and expand it. Also, add some personal information to the article like the DOB and marital status etc using an infobox. If you've done all these, then submit it again.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Allen Estrin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Allen Estrin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator (talk) 13:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Country Walk case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deposition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Allen Estrin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Zucker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:48, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wenatchee child abuse prosecutions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pierce County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Larry Elder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to KABC

Sean Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Riverside

Thom Beck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to KCBS

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 11:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"The 'Pop Chronicles' Team" circa 1970

@DougHill: : Search:

"Mike Dorrough" sound television|radio|recording

"father of multi-band processing"
recipient of Emmy Technical Achievement Award for 2000

Dorrough Loudness Monitor

receives the NAB Radio Engineering Achievement Award for 2000

There seems to be adequate online information and he seems to be important enough for a Mike Dorrough.

T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 08:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@T3g5JZ50GLq: this is such a good idea that K6GLH beat us to it, creating a page at: Michael L. Dorrough. So I turned Mike Dorrough into a redirect. There's plenty of work for us to do on that page. DougHill (talk) 17:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re-posting an archived post

I see that you re-posted a post that Johnuniq recently archived, but that the archived version is still at ~~Talk:Day-care sex-abuse hysteria/Archive 1#So the CONFIRMED day-care abuse at Country Walk is "hysteria" as well?~~ Talk:Day-care sex-abuse hysteria/Archive 1#Country Walk. Also see what Johnuniq stated here about responding to old posts. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 20:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you haven't removed the duplicate from the archive, I will. But next time...remove the duplicate (or rather original). Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 16:33, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I now see what you were asking for. Thanks. (It was easier to respond to the old post to explain what I was doing.) DougHill (talk) 17:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Country Walk case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telemundo 51.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saying PragerU is anti-alt-right assumes their definition of the alt-right is factual. They made that video to mislead others and dilute the meaning of it. Also, I'm new to Wikipedia and am still getting the hang of this "talk" thing. Eeeethann (talk) 17:32, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Singular "they"

Hello, Doug. I broadly share your views on the singular "they", but I see you have fairly recently edited My Word!, where I have this very day deliberately perpetrated one in the second sentence of the third paragraph of "Later series". It is beyond me to write "during her time" here, which I don't think would help the reader. What think you? While I'm here, you have added a red link to RadioEchoes: do you think it probable that there will ever be an article about that website? I feel red links to potential articles should be used reasonably sparingly, and am not sure about this one. – Best wishes, Tim riley talk 21:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Source in source

Template:Source in source has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Credibility Gap Shearer Lander McKean.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Credibility Gap Shearer Lander McKean.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —holly {chat} 17:43, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]