User talk:Dravidianhero
This is Dravidianhero's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
OTRS and Commons
[edit]Hi. OTRS is badly backlogged, so one possibility is that you sent in a permission email, and it hasn't yet been processed. I did a search, but our search function doesn't work well for free text. If you tell me when you sent it, I can search for it more easily.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 20:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- I know, what you mean. Tbere is a Malaysian guy, who is per self description on his userpage a "Malay supremacist". Could you explain to me, what's the reason for such thinking among Malays? I'm an Indian and I have never seen a supremacist in this form, besides "religious" fanatics.
First of all, a distinction should be made between "Malay" and "Malaysian". As I understand it, a Malay is somebody whose native tongue is one of the various forms of the Malay language, basically the inhabitants of the southernmost provinces of Thailand, the Peninsula of Malacca, the eastern coast of Sumatra and the coastal regions of Borneo. So you have Malays in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei. A Malaysian is a citizen of the country called Malaysia, where you have, besides Malays, various other indigenous groups, Chinese and Indians. Because the Chinese and Indians are descendants of people who came to present Malaysia during the 19th century in the times of British colonial rule, Malay nationalists considered that they should not have the same rights as the Malays who coined the term Bumiputera, from the Sanskrit words bhumi, "land" and putra, "son" (which, you will notice, is an amusing paradox). Hence the expression Ketuanan Melayu, which means roughly "Malay lordship". This apartheid-like ideology is in stark contrast to the Indonesian conception of the nation, which since the end of the Soeharto regime no longer makes a distinction between "indigenous" and "non-indigenous" Indonesians. Malaysia has as a legacy the British conception of the nation, within which one distinguishes "communities", while Indonesia has adopted the French conception of the nation, which French historian Ernest Renan defines as a group of people "united by the desire to live together". Back to Malaysia, even the other "indigenous" groups, who are Christians or animists, seem to have a lower status since the state religion of Malaysia is Islam. In Indonesia, there is no reference to Islam in the constitution (this is why it is not a "Muslim country"), --Humboldt 21:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
- I see now. So the problem is the bhumiputra policy, thanks!-- Dravidian Hero 22:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Actually the problem is a "racist" conception of the nation, where some citizens, the Malays, are regarded as having more rights than others. The Bumiputera policy is just a consequence of this conception,--Humboldt 06:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]Your recent editing history at Dravidian languages shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Some doubt
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero, I do have a couple of questions that you only can answer. First, why did you label certain films as "South Indian films" instead of just Indian films. That actually sounds racist, doesn't it? (and your username is no help either, it further supports my suspicion). That definitely should be changed. And then what exactly was the point of this edit? Johannes003 (talk) 15:10, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
- A film made in India is an Indian film, irrespective of its language or region, additionally the language may be added (I used to write "...is an Indian Tamil/Telugu/Hindi film...", which IMO is perfect!), but I don't feel it's right to separate films by regions. South India is part of India too and a Sound Indian film is as much a part of the Indian film industry as a North Indian film, why further distinguish it? Yes, I think this needs to be talked about and a different solution has to be found. Did the Indian cinema task force allow you to do that? (I didn't go through the archives, so I don't know) And don't add spaces after references, neither MOS:REFSPACE nor MOS:PUNCTSPACE does say that. In fact, per WP:WHITE there should be as little whitespace as possible. If you use a gadget to edit the page, the white spaces will be automatically removed. Johannes003 (talk) 18:21, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm just understanding that you do this for bilingual films only. Then just call it Indian film (without the addition of language), why has it to be further distinguished. Then how would you call Vishwaroopam, a Tamil-Hindi bilingual? At Naan E's page you suggested this change, but I don't see that anyone else agreed with you, in fact nobody other than you even mentioned the word "South", that's not a consensus. And what is it political about that? And then what about this edit? Just because something is sourced, it doesn't mean that it is important too. I found terms like "a visually scintillating yet emotional", that is not one bit encyclopedical and even worse was not even sourced. Claims like "This was done to maintain continuity in Dhanush's appearance in the African schedule portions of the film" are pure WP:OR. I know what I'm doing, I have not removed one relevant sentence from the page. I request you not to undo edits with one click! Johannes003 (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have a feeling that we're talking past each other. I don't mind whether Paradesi is called an Indian, a Tamil or an Indian Tamil film (at the moment it's being called just a film, btw, but that's not the point anyway!), all three forms are alright, but I would object to it being called a "South" Indian film. All I'm asking is why this unneeded accentuation? Does it make you, Dravidian, feel more proud? You're just beating around the bush ("I request you to present content solely per WP:NPOV, not per your personal likings" - what content dude?). Reg. Maryan, check the talk page, that should make things clear. Johannes003 (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ha ha, I'm against the South Indian film industry? What makes you think so? Did I ever say so? Would you please stop assuming things? I have almost exclusively worked on South Indian film articles. In fact, I hate it that people outside of India equate Indian cinema with Bollywood and neglect the regional industries. Per WP:FILMLEAD, "If the film's nationality is singularly defined, it should be identified in the opening sentence". The film's nationality is singularly defined, namely Indian, so it is an Indian film, that's all, nothing more, nothing less. Since there are many languages in India, the language too is added often, but why a region? It's just wrong! It baffles me that you are even defending this. Who accuses who of being biased? This is not just a "personal problem", man. Many editors will object to this. And who has accepted this? I think, this topic should be discussed at the Indian cinema task force, because I strongly feel that this is a no-go. Johannes003 (talk) 23:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- Wait, did you really say that Bollywood has all the rights to be called Indian cinema, other industries don't? Wow, now I have a very clear conception of you. Don't let anyone else ever read this! Inferiority complex? How? Dude, don't just haphazardly throw some random words at me! You said, "We are all Indians regardless what language we speak or which language is "biggest"" - Point, exactly that! Absolutely exactly that! North, South, West or East, doesn't matter, it's all Indian, that is what I'm saying. So you agree with me, aren't you? Are you realizing that you are starting to contradict yourself now? And WP:FILMLEAD does very well state that the nationality (nationality is the adjective used for a country, you should now that!) should be in the lead. But add the region, nobody ever said that. Nobody ever will say that. Johannes003 (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Would you please stop reverting? No guideline in wikipedia says that a "film industry" should be added to the lead text. You have not replied to me after the discussion, even after so long time. That means it's over here. Johannes003 (talk) 12:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- I said STOP IT! Reply to me first, man! You did not reply me, that means you agree that my view is correct, that IS consensus!! Do revert back your edits yourself immediately. Heights!! Johannes003 (talk) 12:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- You have not replied, you have remained silent. That means you have agreed, boy! If you cannot accept rules, you have nothing to do here at Wikipedia. This is absolutely outrageous! Johannes003 (talk) 12:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/April Fools'
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/April Fools'. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 04:17, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Maryan
[edit]There is no point in changing OST covers unless it is bound to some terms. Non-free images must be used as little as possible. The cover uploaded earlier is same as that on the Official Website of A.R. Rahman which is the most ultimate verified source. What you uploaded is some special offer based (may be EP) or some other form of edition of the same film soundtrack. Moreover it isn't square as album arts usually of that shape. They may be slightly in disproportion with size-ratio. It is not wrong what you did but its not necessary.
Arjann (talk) 15:23, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- hehe... :) yeah thats 3.5/5. Didn't realize, I just did it accidently. Sorry.
Arjann (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- hehe... :) yeah thats 3.5/5. Didn't realize, I just did it accidently. Sorry.
Interested?
[edit]Since u edited Parasakthi (1952 film) very well and it is almost complete, I wanted to know if u were interested in taking part in the film's peer review. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:44, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that I'm not familiar enough with all the WP policies, guidelines, etc.. there are so many. For me it's an excellent article. :p -- Dravidian Hero 12:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Taking part in a peer review is simple. After making a thorough analysis of the article, suggest any improvements on the peer review page - that's how it works. But if u r not ready, never mind. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Kochadaiyaan
[edit]I had made some changes on Kochadaiyaan as per the guide lines and updated the news in the release section. Can you kindly check that for any possible violations.Benedictdilton (talk) 18:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Classic Incantations
[edit]Hi :) I've created a page named Classic Incantations: The German Film Orchestra Babelsberg performs A.R. Rahman. If you think there must be changes or some additions/deletions/suggestions you may do so.
Arjann (talk) 09:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll take a look at it.-- Dravidian Hero 13:10, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
A peer review is going on. U want to take part? Kailash29792 (talk) 11:07, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- I could take part in the discussion, but I hardly see me as a qualified reviewer yet.-- Dravidian Hero 13:10, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Sock Puppet
[edit]I found out the reason which triggered such an investigation. It was a minor ignorance from the side of mine. I had made my side clear on the investigation page. The account that created the problem was created by a friend of mine who had done some edits on wiki earlier some times we share the same computer and ISP. Please check and let me know whether I had to provide more evidence or some thing like that.Benedictdilton (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
I had posted a reply on the investigation page. I request your help in getting out of this trouble.Benedictdilton (talk) 23:33, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
I had made my mind. I am quitting wikipedia. I would like to delete all contents on this account. I had put a request to delete my user page. I want to delete my talk page as well. Dont know how to do it . Request help in that.Benedictdilton (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Vandal?
[edit]With reference to Melayu Kingdom, one does not place generic boiler templates on long-established, highly productive, good faith editors. One does not accuse them of vandalism. Further, you have no authority to threaten, let alone impose, a block. If you disagree with an editor, then you should use the article’s talk page to discuss and try to reach agreement. I see you are relatively new to wikipedia, and may not yet be used the sites norms. I hope this helps. Regards --Merbabu (talk) 03:21, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
- Saying "With all due respect" really means you're not giving any respect. My comments above still stand.They about process and have nothing to do with whatever stupid little nationalist/ethnic (Mr "hero"?) games you editors might be playing. I don't care about them. I'm talking about your apparent problem with wikipedia process. It's about time you all used the talk page and quit reverting each other, or I will request the page gets protected. And it might be the wrong version. --Merbabu (talk) 12:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Warning and Vandalism?
[edit]I see you have posted warning sign in my talk page that I have disrupt Wikipedia on Melayu Kingdom article. This is my first warning on vandalism. What did I do? Is this a warning or a threat? I see you quite new in wikipedia, let me enlighten you, this is not how we roll here in wikipedia, we conduct disagreement in civilized and mutual respect, also assuming good faith of fellow editors. I don't mean to putting finger here, but I see judging from your edits, I began to doubt your sincerity on editing wikipedia in non-biased way, since you seems to somehow pushing Tamil Nationalism agenda, through over-crediting "Tamil influence and cultural contribution" to Southeast Asian history. You see.., a sign of chauvinism and cultural over-pride and one sided claims, will quickly raised red flag by other editors that also watching the article. Ancient Indonesia did influenced by Indian Dharmic Hindu-Buddhist civilization, however as far as I know from books I've red, most of cultural imports are through sanskrit language as sacred language of Hinduism, Pali also influenced through Buddhism sacred texts. Tamil language influences also exist but minimal and only few as found in Barus inscription. The term "Malaya" is also can be found in sanskrit that means from "garden", "sandalwood", "mountains", "something elevated" thus denote mountains, so there are many suggestions on the etymology of the term "Malay". You simply can not (and may not) push and force your version, and went as far discouraging other editors to edit and contribute. As Indonesian, Melayu Kingdom article has cultural proximity for me and naturally it is under my watch. I can not let it fell into, suspected Tamil nationalist agendas and claims. I hope you understand our rules and etiquette here, regards.Gunkarta (talk) 06:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
WP-RS
[edit]I am providing you with a piece of news and websites which publish the same news kindly tell me which one is reliable and which one is not and why.
- http://southmonitor.com/beijing-new-delhi-must-shake-hands-chinese-premier/
- http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-05-15/india/39280782_1_youth-delegation-recent-border-stand-off-india-and-china
- http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-05-15/news/39282144_1_youth-delegation-recent-border-stand-off-india-and-china
- http://news.in.msn.com/national/beijing-new-delhi-must-shake-hands-chinese-premier
- http://www.indianexpress.com/news/india-china-must-shake-hands-says-li-keqiang/1116542/
- http://www.rediff.com/news/report/india-and-china-must-shake-hands-pm-li-keqiang/20130515.htm
- http://www.deccanchronicle.com/130515/news-world/article/ahead-visit-li-keqiang-says-india-and-china-must-unite-economic-growth
- http://dawn.com/2013/05/16/china-india-must-shake-hands-says-chinese-pm/
- http://103.1.112.194:3601/Politics/zyLztjtjhmbyFRJLd1zHEP/India-and-China-must-shake-hands-says-Li-Keqiang.html
- http://www.hongkongherald.com/index.php/sid/214531105/scat/9366300fc9319e9b
- http://www.newsx.com/world/asia/india-and-china-must-shake-hands-says-li-keqiang
- http://m.firstpost.com/world/india-china-must-make-asia-engineworld-economy-says-li-keqiang-785413.html
All the above websites have the same news with same words as published in southmonitor.com . Please tell me the difference. Benedictdilton (talk) 21:10, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
- There are some hints, how to identify RS. Check for example WP:USEBYOTHERS -- Dravidian Hero 11:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Protection policy
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Protection policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 16:29, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 05:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Maryan...
[edit]Hey, I'm working on it (Maryan) again. See now you observe why did i create a separate section for Reception in the soundtrack part. It has become so lengthy. You understand well but that guy Johannes he thinks everything is trivia. Whatever I write I ensure its neutral which is required. Hope you support
Arjann (talk) 07:57, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
The Sivaji Ganesan film which was released in 1963 and re-released digitally in 2012 is currently a GA. But one important section - the soundtrack section is still too short of content. I have however found one page [1] which can help expand the soundtrack section to the max. The forum site contains max info from an article titled "The Little-Known Music Of `Karnan'" which was published in Sruti magazine in 2001. Since u r very generous, are u able to add content from that site? Bcoz I m going out of station for few days. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Why no response? Kailash29792 (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
What do you want? i know that you are a fan of vijay kamal and rajani and putting such jokes into them but don't takes that jokes or unnecessery edits into malayalam films or actors Sreeramakrishna14 (talk) 12:27, 29 May 2013
stop giving me blood pressure
[edit]then why dont u split the two articles eega and naani???? why on earth u merge the articles and fight for images ??? Murrallli (talk) 14:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Problem is solved. Some uninvolved people had deleted the previous image without knowing basics. There is only 1 article, because the content is mostly the same, decided at Talk:Naan Ee.-- Dravidian Hero 14:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Eega poster
[edit]Dear Dravidian,
Admin's are there to decide whether to keep the image or to delete it. We can't do anything against admin's. Because i too felt that previous image file deletion was unjustified. Um!!! but we are unable to decide, because we are not admin's know!. So please don't revert my upload in that File. Wait for the Consensus to be given by some admin (or) nominate it in WP:DRV according to the said by Stefan 2 in that FFD. I hope you can understand by this. Happy day and editing :) Raghusri (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Category:South Indian-language films
[edit]Category:South Indian-language films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Johannes003 (talk) 12:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Johannes003. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Johannes003 (talk) 12:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
May 2013
[edit]Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Johannes003 (talk) 12:17, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Personal attacks
[edit]For this edit calling another editor a rascist.
Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 14:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- SIIMA Award for Best Actor in Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vishnu (actor)
- SIIMA Award for Best Comedian in Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Soori
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Thirukumaran Entertainment
[edit]Hello, Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Thirukumaran Entertainment should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thirukumaran Entertainment .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 06:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Eega album cover.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Eega album cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Naaneeaudio.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Naaneeaudio.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 09:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Thank you for the addition of Awards to Telugu film articles, but please leave the edit summary. Raghusri 11:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 1st South Indian International Movie Awards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Prithviraj and Santhanam
- SIIMA Award for Best Actor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Mr. Perfect and Prithviraj
- Lal Jose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Diamond Necklace
- SIIMA Award for Best Actor in a Negative Role (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Narain
- SIIMA Award for Best Female Debutant (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Lakshmi Menon
- SIIMA Award for Best Lyricist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Nanban
- SIIMA Award for Best Music Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vidyasagar
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Editor's Barnstar | |
For your tireless contributions to South Indian film related articles. —Vensatry (Ping me) 18:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks :) -- Dravidian Hero 23:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (music)
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (music). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Gouravam
[edit]Hi Bro. I am Pavan and if you remember, we used the merged posters for Gouravam and Payanam. Now coming to the point, please send a link of Gouravam Tamil widescreen poster so that we can do it as we did in the case of Payanam, rather than opting for two portrait versions used merged which is existing now. Thank you.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
So sad to hear this. But if deleted, upload a poster of Tamil ft all the 3 characters - Allu Sirish , Prakash Raj, Yami Gautham since it was a film of mostly Tamil technicians as well as actors. Thank you bro.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
To be frank, we just wanted to justify that Gouravam is a Bilingual by usina a poster. But unknowingly we opposed wiki rules. Anyway, lets contribute something to our films wiki articles. Hope a huge success as a wikipedian for both of us. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I have nominated it for becoming a good article. But there's one section there very hard to edit: the controversies section. Can u pls re-edit with information from the existing sources? I am going out of station and will return on Saturday only. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 12:06, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that will be no problem. Have a nice time.-- Dravidian Hero 12:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
The article SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Director has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unreferenced award article. No evidence of in depth coverage independent reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
The article SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable award. No references. No evidence of independent in-depth coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:00, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ee Adutha Kaalathu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Category:South Indian films
[edit]Category:South Indian films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Johannes003 (talk) 12:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
plot
[edit]Hi bro. I am Pavan. Please verify the tamil ending of Gouravam if you watched it. i saw the telugu version and i wrote its ending along with the tamil one. reply soon.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 08:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Parasakthi Themes
[edit]This needs some serious copy editing. Can u help? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:30, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Australian roads)
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Australian roads). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Edit warring. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 09:16, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Peer review
[edit]If in case u r interested, pls take part in the peer review of the article Chandraleka. It would be useful if u agree. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 14:58, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:PD-ineligible
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:PD-ineligible. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 22:17, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape case
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2012 Delhi gang rape case. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:17, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Are u editing Thalaivaa? If yes, there are some useful info here not in the article:
- http://newindianexpress.com/entertainment/tamil/Will-Thalaivaa-enter-the-150-crore-club/2013/07/25/article1700153.ece
- http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-cinema-news-10/vijay-thalaivaa-25-07-13.html
- http://www.ibtimes.co.in/articles/494466/20130725/vijay-thalaivaa-release-thuppakki-box-office-collection.htm
- http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-cinema-news-10/watch-thalaivaa-in-sun-tv-thalaivaa-vijay-17-07-13.html
- http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/cinema-columns/shotcuts-sound-appeal/article4955958.ece ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:14, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
[edit]Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Johannes003 (talk) 13:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
stop interfering when some one is editing
[edit]you can do ur edits as per ur requirement, if u edit conflict again and abuse me again like this, I will report u to admin, stop abusing fellow editors, when the are editing Murrallli (talk) 14:12, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC 2013
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC 2013. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 23:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
August 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm Raghusri. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Baahubali without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Raghusri 13:48, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (U.S. state and territory highways)
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (U.S. state and territory highways). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks a lot
[edit]Thank you for your help on Maryan and Maryan (soundtrack). Where are you these days??? You may have a look at the articles and edit them. Moreover, I have received honours from two users for my editing on these pages. :) Arjann (talk) 13:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:17, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Template talk:Infobox country
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox country. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 13:17, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:19, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
A beer for you!
[edit]For your tireless work on the SIIMA :-) Cheers! -- L o g X 19:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC) |
- Well, time for a small break I guess :) Cheers!-- Dravidian Hero 19:23, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 15
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2nd South Indian International Movie Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakshmi Menon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Santiago B. Villafania
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Santiago B. Villafania. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:47, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
You being the main contributor of this article as per highest number of edits, i hope you plan to take it to WP:DYK. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestion. I will take a look at this when I'm bored. -- Dravidian Hero 22:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you are new and completely clueless about it, let me know and i can file the nomination for you. Just keep in mind that it needs to be done within 5 days after creation of article i.e. 20th is last date. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on User talk:L'Origine du monde
[edit]Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User talk:L'Origine du monde. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
DYK for Nina Davuluri
[edit]On 24 September 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nina Davuluri, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Nina Davuluri (pictured) is the first Indian American to win the Miss America beauty pageant? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nina Davuluri. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 04:17, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Dravidian origins of Hinduism
[edit]Hi DravidianHero. Sources on the Dravidian origins of Hinduism would be very welcome to me, to settle a dispute in the origins of Hinduism and to make clear that there are more roots then the Vedic/Brahmanic religion. See also [[2]]. Greetings, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- You may be interested in this one. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
First discuss on the page
[edit]If you want to remove some content from List of Indian Academy Award winners and nominees, please discuss on the page first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.200.249.203 (talk) 09:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Suggest you do as the IP suggest and discuss your mass removal on the talk page before edit warring. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'm waiting to see your arguments on the talkpage, else I will report you to ANI.-- Dravidian Hero 22:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
- Go ahead, report me to ANI. Beware of boomerangs. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- I think you mistakenly listed the issue at WP:AN, not WP:ANI as you threatened you would. Not sure if you want to move it or start another thread there? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Time to start making mature discussion on the list talkpage, don't you think? Start to define the inclusion criteria? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- I'm waiting to see your arguments on the talkpage, else I will report you to ANI.-- Dravidian Hero 22:40, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]I feel sorry that u are blocked bcos of sockpuppetry. Pls tell the admin's that u apologise for ur acts, and u will not indulge in such an activity again. Only in such cases they may unblock u. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 16:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
- No, I've lost interest in editing except for South Indian cinema. Earlier I've been working on history topics. That was crushed down by Anti-Dravidian elements and I got a block after block by a small group of admins. The first block of that kind was my stance at India article, that Hindi was not a national language, a huge discussion. They seriously wanted to push that Hindi was the national language of India in the article. Everyone was against me. They found a way to gag me with a block and ironically Gujarat HC ruled against the national language status. At some point of time it gets easy for them when a block gets indefinite status. But I really like people with serious interest in improving articles like you and it was an honour to work with you on various subjects. Please keep doing what you like most. -- Dravidian Hero 23:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Sample of a self-declared "Tamil" admin: 1. He rev one of my recent edits which any real Tamil would be proud of. -- Dravidian Hero 00:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Just want to pint out.. the administrator's action was correct in the context mentioned above. It's immaterial if his background is Tamil or whatever. Salih (talk) 15:50, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes he created an alibi article The Hindu (Tamil) after I exposed him here BTw: Here is an article where there are no separate language articles for the same magazine: Femina (India). Cha-ching.:D Exposed by - Dravidian Hero 23:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- The history of the article The Hindu (Tamil) shows that the article was not created by him. Salih (talk) 04:29, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
- Yes he created an alibi article The Hindu (Tamil) after I exposed him here BTw: Here is an article where there are no separate language articles for the same magazine: Femina (India). Cha-ching.:D Exposed by - Dravidian Hero 23:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Film
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Film for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:28, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Director
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Director for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:29, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Cinematographer
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Cinematographer for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Actor
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Actor for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Actress
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Actress for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Actress in a Supporting Role
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Actress in a Supporting Role for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Actor in a Negative Role
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Actor in a Negative Role for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:31, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Comedian
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Comedian for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:32, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Music Director
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Music Director for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:32, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Lyricist
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Lyricist for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:33, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Female Playback Singer
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Female Playback Singer for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Male Playback Singer
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Male Playback Singer for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Male Debutant
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Male Debutant for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Female Debutant
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Female Debutant for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Dance Choreographer
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Dance Choreographer for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Fight Choreographer
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Fight Choreographer for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Producer for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Director
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Debutant Director for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 18:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SIIMA Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role
[edit]Hello Dravidianhero,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SIIMA Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 22:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gouravam1look.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Gouravam1look.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 15:25, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Please join the discussion on Talk:Glengarry Glen Ross (film)
[edit]I am soliciting comments for an RfC that is currently open on the "Glengarry Glen Ross (film)" page. There is disagreement about where the film was set (New York vs. Chicago).
One of the issues is whether it is original research to cite to elements in the film itself (including props, dialogue, and a statement in the end credits that it was "filmed on location in New York City") to establish setting.
Response so far in the RfC has been mixed. Comments welcome! Xanthis (talk) 13:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Less busy-looking table templates
[edit]Dsimic and I have a discussion going regarding the appearance of the table-cell templates {{Dunno}}
and {{Unknown}}
. I see you've commented there before; could I pester you to weigh in? Thank you! – voidxor (talk | contrib) 01:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Vanakkam Chennai poster.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Vanakkam Chennai poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chaarulatha 2012 poster.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Chaarulatha 2012 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Chaarulatha 2012 poster.jpg
[edit]Hello. A tag has been placed on File:Chaarulatha 2012 poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
== Replaceable fair use File:Review Raja screenshot.png ==
Thanks for uploading File:Review Raja screenshot.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Review Raja.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Review Raja.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Irandam Ulagam.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Irandam Ulagam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Naiyaandiposter.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Naiyaandiposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 31 October 2021 (UTC)