User talk:Enplaned

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-600px-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Enplaned, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 23:52, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 675. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maurice J. Gallagher, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phoenix. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holtville Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imperial County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Global Eagle Entertainment

The article Global Eagle Entertainment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per relevant standard (WP:ORG). Could not find significant coverage by reliable independent secondary sources. A Google News search suggests that GEE is engaging in an aggressive digital marketing push to drive up its stock price. Several WP:SPAs have been adding promotional content to this article at the same time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dr. Fleischman (talk) 19:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Global Eagle Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Eagle Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Eagle Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dr. Fleischman (talk) 16:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Enplaned. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Enplaned. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pacific Southwest Airlines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange County. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Empire Airlines (1974–1986), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Enplaned. Thank you for your work on Texas Aeronautics Commission. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Enplaned. Thank you for your work on United States National Bank of San Diego. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael E. Levine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benno Schmidt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air New England (1970–1981), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barnstable.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northeast Airlines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport, Vermont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Midway Airlines (1976–1991), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I respectfully suggest that when someone writes a long, extensively cited article, the appropriate first response to editorializing is not to dump the article, but to ask the author to revise. There was bathwater in that article, but there was also a healthy baby. The version you reinstated was poor and had 16 citations - most airline articles are, frankly, really bad. The one you dumped had over 100 citations, including many to original government, company and industry documents - which included financial data - many of which are available for anyone to inspect via links. If you want to judge how a company did, profitability is pretty fundamental. It's rare to see airline articles that contain performance data (lots of what airplanes were flown when). Seems to me we should want to encourage such data.

You dumped all of that. I'd suggest a more constructive approach would be to ask me to revise. You're always free to later dump an article if the author is unresponsive.

Some of the paragraphs I wrote are literally cited sentence by sentence. In my experience, that's extremely rare in Wikipedia articles. Enplaned (talk) 01:35, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is thrown out... Its all preserved in the history and anything you wish to revise can be pulled from there. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Florida Express

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Florida Express, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:01, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Your edit to Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Trunk carrier

added links pointing to Panagra, Santa Catalina Island, Capital Airlines and Trans Caribbean

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legacy carrier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flag carriers.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Enplaned. Thank you for your work on Samoan Airlines. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Airline deregulation and the end of the Muse era

Your February edit to the History of Southwest Airlines added a section titled Airline deregulation and the end of the Muse era. The section includes some bold and opinionated claims, editorializing, and a bit of mild WP:PUFFERY that lacks clear inline citations, making it hard to tell if these are your opinions or if they are are drawn from the Muse book that is cited sparingly.

A significant inspiration for the Act was the success of Southwest, PSA and other intrastate carriers.

...the CAB (which in the meantime was generally accommodating)...

With a Federal certificate, Southwest was more free to expand within the entire United States than it had ever been within Texas; it didn't have to ask permission to enter a market and market entry couldn't be challenged in court.

Muse and King had never seen eye-to-eye.

...Muse was energetic, creative and critical to the startup and survival of Southwest...

...in a deregulated industry, Midway could function much the same way that Hobby or Love Field did... Midway was, in fact resuscitated after deregulation...

...Southwest's expansion after deregulation was... slow and steady...

Additionally, I think this passage needs to be rewritten in plain language. I'm a bit stumped.

...[Southwest was] keeping its financial powder dry...

Lastly, the sentences contrasting King and Muses's personal backgrounds seem out of place and irrelevant. If these are coming from a published source, they need clear attribution and perhaps a bit more explanation as to why they are relevant ("Historian Jane Smith says that Muse and King always clashed because Muse liked snooker and King preferred pool, leading to shouting matches over which game would be played in the Southwest executive lounge..."). If it's speculation by you, it should be rewritten or deleted, per WP:SOAPBOX and WP:OR.

I contemplated trying to rewrite the section, but the lack of clear citations and context makes this hard to do in an encyclopedic manner without access to the Muse book. Cheers, Carguychris (talk) 04:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]