User talk:Eseb
January 2009
[edit]Fair point about Mirror's Edge (people getting confused). Just as a general comment - JP release dates should only be included in the infoboxes of JP-developed games. Much thanks! Fin©™ 17:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 23:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Eseb, and welcome to Wikipedia! | |
 Introduction 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia |
 How to write a great article |
| If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place | |
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Greta Thunberg and Extinction rebellion Balance
[edit]Hi I say your comment and thought you might have some ideas on how to add a section regarding criticism and concerns of Hijack/planting of the Thonberg message.
Criticism
[edit]Greta Thonberg responded [1] to concerns of corporate capture of her message which has been expressed by the Wrong Kind of Green [2], an Indigenous peoples environmental group. [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogerGLewis (talk • contribs) 02:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
References
- This same paragraph was also added to Extinction Rebellion; my edit removing it was reverted there as it was here, and it should be removed from there, for the same reasons it's been removed here. Levivich 18:08, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Greta Thonberg responded [1] to concerns of corporate capture of her message which has been expressed by the Wrong Kind of Green [2], an Indigenous peoples environmental group. [3] "We attempt to expose those who undermine the People’s Agreement. One role of the non-profit industrial complex is to undermine, marginalize and make irrelevant, the People’s Agreement. The reason being, to protect corporate interests by which they are funded. As well, the non-profit industrial complex protects the industrialized, capitalist economic system, responsible for the capitalist destruction of our shared environment. Those groups who continue to protect such interests must be considered complicit in crimes against humanity. RogerGLewis (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- This content shouldn't be anywhere: it totally lacks secondary sources and thus fails WP:V spectacularly--not just because of lack of reliability, but the quality of the sourcing indicates this isn't noteworthy. Moreover, it's grammatically challenged: the "which" in "which has been expressed" refers in a very wonky way to "her message", since that is the closest antecedent, but I think it's meant to refer to "concerns", which is a plural and too far away for proper anaphoric reference. Finally, I think you left out a closing quotation mark in this longer comment; at first I thought you, RogerGLewis, were making a statement about complicity. Drmies (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- It contains WP:SYNTH because Thunberg's words addressing pushback in general does not name the other sources provided here. That means RogerGLewis is doing WP:Original research to connect the dots. It is also a neutrality/BLP problem because the "About us" text from the criticizing blog is being used to imply Thunberg is an example of the those things the criticizing blog exists to do battle against. Another problem is the long quute from the criticizing blog is about the criticizing blog, not about the subject of this article, so it is off topic. And the text fails WP:Verification because none of the sources identify the criticing blog as "an indigenous people's environmental group". If it were not for all the other problems we might be able to say something with inline attribution to the authors of the blog column. Something like, "According to....". Maybe. But what we have here are self publishing people who self-describe their obvious advocacy pieces as "independent jouranlism". Who cares, everyone is entitled to an opinion and Wordpress blogs are free. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[1] The concerns section is I think relevant to both articles which Page should we conduct the discussion it is probably easier to find consensus on one page and then discuss any changes to the core point which I think is a general point on most polarised positions in Political economy./* Criticism */ Consensus process nominate talk at extinction rebellion page for this discussion as well?[2] RogerGLewis (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sources supporting this content are too weak for a BLP article (probably also weak for any contentious claim in any article). Without better sourcing, there is no place for this in the article. Pavlor (talk) 06:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Carbohydrate foam listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Carbohydrate foam. Since you had some involvement with the Carbohydrate foam redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)