User talk:Ethmostigmus

Welcome

Hi Ethmostigmus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Gderrin (talk) 19:50, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the welcome, and for the helpful links! I figure after using Wikipedia for almost my entire life it's about time I give something back :) Ethmostigmus (talk) 03:38, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Pterostylis angulata is a lovely page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pterostylis angulata

Hello Ethmostigmus,

Thanks for your fantastic work on the Pterostylis angulata article. I hope you don't mind the changes I've made. Please keep up your excellent orchid work. Gderrin (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Pterostylis antennifera is a terrific article. Great job! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:43, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A centipede for you!

	Scolopendra sumichrasti, to be specific.
	Thank-you for your contributions! It's nice to find another editor interested in centipedes. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 15:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome to the drive! One editor cannot solve the whole backlog, but together we can do so much more. There are a lot of uncited articles that are about insects, such as these that you can test out your citation skills:

– Good luck! You'll need it. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I'll definitely be giving some love to the Eumenes, Phidippus regius, and Armadillidiidae articles :) Ethmostigmus (talk) 02:03, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you can use [search term] incategory:"All articles lacking sources" in the search bar to find more articles to cite. Searching Arthropoda incategory:"All articles lacking sources" do give a fair amount of articles. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 02:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cape Barren goose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anser. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One source tag

Hello, a quick reminder that {{one source}} (this article relies largely or entirely on a single source) is a cleanup tag for articles that cite just one source, and that's a problem. Quoting from the template documentation:

A single source is usually less than ideal, because a single source may be inaccurate or biased. Without other sources for corroboration, accuracy or neutrality may be suspect. [...] Citing only one source is not a violation of any policy. Consider not adding this tag to stubs, articles that are being actively expanded, or articles that have no apparent problems with verifiability and neutrality.

If the cited source is reliable, fully verifies the content in the article, and does not raise any potential issues of neutral point of view, it's not a problem. This is often the case with stubs or short articles on uncontroversial topics. Since the purpose of citations is to allow readers to verify the contents of an article, asking creators to add redundant additional citations is not going to improve it, and in some cases might damage it (by obscuring the actual source of information). – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my mistake, I was under the impression that pretty much any article relying solely on one source was inherently considered to be somewhat unreliable/undesirable and in need of at least one additional independent source for verification. Are there any particular articles I ought to remove the tag from? Ethmostigmus (talk) 09:22, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had the chance to go through every article you tagged, so it would be great if you could double-check and remove any unnecessary tags. – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:27, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, will do, thanks for the heads up :) Ethmostigmus (talk) 09:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Ethmostigmus! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:38, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

February 2024 WikiProject Unreferenced articles backlog drive – award

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Ethmostigmus for collecting more than 50 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer (talk) 18:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ethmostigmus brownii

Hi, @Ethmostigmus: to highlight i just removed the line for Ethmostigmus brownii (Butler,1877) from your namesake taxonpage. I did that following notion on Chilobase 2.0. - which says its a synonym of Ethmostigmus rubripes Newport, 1845, although im wary as saw other bits that were not well updated, but see Chilobase link // Sjl197 (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for fixing that! I'm a bit embarrassed that I missed that while working on the species list, but all's well that ends well :) Ethmostigmus (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Callitris endlicheri

Hi Ethmostigmus, I thought you may be interested to know that I've removed stub status for C. endlicheri after your recent additions & my own edits. Also curious to know why you have a banner for Languages 0? Keep up the good work, Roger McCart Rogermccart (talk) 07:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roger,

So sorry for the late reply, I've been taking a bit of a break from Wikipedia due to health issues. Thank you so much for your improvements to the article, it's shaping up quite nicely :) The lang-0 userbox is just a joke, I do have some difficulties with reading/writing but I am in fact a native English speaker. Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 03:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Lepiota brunneolilacea

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lepiota brunneolilacea, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Species list template

Hi Ethmostigmus! Do you know about the {{Species list}} template? It and its relatives make long lists of taxa so simple. I found out about it quite by accident a few years ago. It automatically italicizes species and infraspecies names properly, and it prints authors in small font. It has a parameter for hiding and one to set a header. It beats adding all the bullet points and formatting manually. – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 07:11, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I think I've seen that before but didn't understand how it worked so I just defaulted to plain wikitext :P Cheers for the heads up! Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 05:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. It has made my life easier! – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 05:24, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mouthwashing (video game)

On 5 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mouthwashing (video game), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2024 psychological horror game Mouthwashing utilises non-diegetic scene transitions that mimic glitches and crashes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mouthwashing (video game). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mouthwashing (video game)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]