User talk:FloorMadeOuttaFloor

FloorMadeOuttaFloor, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi FloorMadeOuttaFloor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm NinjaRobotPirate. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hotel Transylvania 3: Summer Vacation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced production companies or distributors. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Respected NinjaRobotPirate, The edit I had made is factually correct, but I will take your advice and search for sources. Also I think replying here, according to me, is more comfortable in my case than to reply on yours. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 13:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MTV Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio Silence. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Touchstone Pictures

I apologize for not leaving a better edit summary with that edit. Anyway, message boards are not considered reliable sources for articles.

Also, to sign your posts, use ~~~~. :) Trivialist (talk) 11:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I can understand what you are saying here,but I will try to find other reliable sources for my edit. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 12:00, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Please read through Wikipedia:Reliable sources before you add any more content to Wikipedia. You can't just cite random websites – they must fulfill the our criteria for a reliable source. The IMDb is even listed on that page as an example of an unreliable source. If you have trouble identifying reliable sources, please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources for some links to discussions, and you can ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. WikiProject Film also has a list of sources. We have a lot of advice and essays on these topics, but you'll have to do some reading. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:44, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will try to use reliable sources,but I never knew that IMDb is an unreliable source :( . FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 07:11, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

P. S.: Right now I am unable to find any reliable sources on distributors so, could you please suggest some websites that can help? Please reply ASAP :) . FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 07:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office Mojo would probably be the most popular choice. The Numbers sometimes has data for films missing from Box Office Mojo. Any trade magazine would also work, such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and Screen Daily. You could also try TheWrap, Deadline.com, etc. Individual countries often have film archives that you can check, such as the AFI Catalog of Feature Films and British Film Institute. For Europe, there's also Lumiere. In Canada, there's Library and Archives Canada. Check the links I gave you above. NinjaRobotPirate (talk)

Box Office Mojo was actually one of the sources I was coincidentally thinking of. Anyways thanks for clearing my query; I will surely use the mentioned sources. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Zoss Productions

Just to let you know I appreciate the thanks, and did what I should have done in the first place and checked for reliable sources. They exist. So I reverted to back your version and added one. Thanks in turn. Barte (talk) 07:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, additional thanks to you too for helping :) FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 07:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20th Century Studios movies

Where did you get that claim that WDSMP distributed Breakthrough and Dark Phoenix? There's no text at the end of the credits other than the TCF logo, and your edits weren't even sourced. Luigitehplumber (talk) 17:25, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, when I saw these in theatres, the text "Distributed by Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures" had appeared at the end. But it somewhat does not appear in later films and is also not mentioned on Box Office Mojo. I will try to find some valid sources and add it again if I find sources as references. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 15:20, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production companies

When adding production companies, the source cited should identify them explicitly as production companies. Not "presented in association with", not "with the participation of", not anything else. Just "production company". template:infobox film is pretty clear about this. That means that if BFI doesn't explicitly list the company as a production company, that company should not be added. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have repeatedly explained this to you. If a company is not explicitly credited as a "production company", you can't add it to the article as such. The next time I see you do this, I'm not going to warn you; I'm going to block you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Distributor

Per Template:Infobox film/doc, if there's a lot of distributors then only one is needed in the infobox, that is, the one where the film is produced. If there's just some, e.g. 2 or 4, then it's fine to include them all, but if it's more than 5 then only one is needed. That's why I've manually undid your edits on Jojo Rabbit. Gerald WL 08:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand what you are trying to say here, but also, as per WP:FILMDIST, a film's domestic and international distributors can be mentioned. However it does not state so for films made by more than one country, so it's difficult to really say whether that edit should stay on the page or not. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wuthering Heights (2011 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thwaite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rogue City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaumont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to revert with twinkle

If you want to revert edits at one time, read Wikipedia:Twinkle#Quick info, so That you won't spam edits. Also, if you don't know how to revert with Twinkle in Mobile view, either ask the Teahouse or go to desktop view and press restore edit. LooneyTraceYT comment • treats 21:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just got the word BTW that You can't edit with Twinkle in Mobile View, so use the desktop view for now. LooneyTraceYT comment • treats 23:04, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I took your advice and started using Twinkle, and it works surprisingly well. I would like to thank you for your really useful suggestion, I will continue using Twinkle in the future as well. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 03:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The War with Grandpa

Sorry about the edit on The War with Grandpa, Universal actually distributed that film internationally but I understand your revert on it, though. --TheRavineStudios (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am trying to find a source saying Universal was involved with the film, so far I haven't found any, but I'll continue searching for a source. FloorMadeOuttaFloor (talk) 11:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok dude, gotcha. --TheRavineStudios (talk) 13:51, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does this work? It mentions Universal here, so...

Link: https://www.classification.gov.au/titles/war-grandpa TheRavineStudios (talk) 16:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this does mention Universal, but I am still unsure whether this is a reliable source so I'll see if this is a reliable source as soon as possible. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 04:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. TheRavineStudios (talk) 07:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I checked Box Office Mojo and it shows that distributors vary in territories worldwide, so that makes it a bit uncertain whether Universal was involved with this film in most territories or not. But I am still researching about this so don't you worry. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 07:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Pleasureme23.

He's been blocked for a month now, so there's no need to worry about PAW Patrol: The Movie that much anymore. Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 21:09, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's pretty great. Now I guess I don't have to revert that guy's edits again and again. That's a relief. Thanks for telling me so. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 03:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reported him, but if you want to report somebody else, go to this link. Signed, Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 11:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced information about distributors

Please don't add details not found in the cited source, such as in this edit. If you've got a source for this stuff, please cite it. You seem to be very keen on adding every company that you think has worked on a film. That is commendable enthusiasm and thoroughness. However, Wikipedia is based on what reliable sources say, not our own research. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I will take your advice and stop doing so, but what about other editors, including LTPHarry, who do so? FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 05:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where does this source say that Focus Features and Dimension are production companies for They (2002 film)? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well it does mention the companies are involved with the film, see the end of the article. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 02:58, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But where does it say that they are production companies? Have I not explained this well enough yet? It doesn't matter if they were "involved" in some way. They have to be explicitly labeled as production companies to be listed in the "production company" parameter of the infobox. The "presented by"/"presentation of" credit is usually a distributor. The reason why template:infobox film says to include a citation where the production company is explicitly labeled is because people engage in this kind of guesswork – "I saw their logo/name listed somewhere, and I think they're probably a production company". The next time I see you add poorly sourced production/distribution company, I'm just going to block you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:46, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

StudioCanal

Well. Next time I will try to put reliable sources for any articles of Wikipedia. But the problem about it is: What can be done to list and detail the movies that weren't produced or made by StudioCanal? I'm talking about movies made during the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s. Do I have to create a new section about that in the StudioCanal article or what? Because the truth is these films are owned by StudioCanal.

1. Movies from the defuncted DEG (De Laurentiis Entertainment Group) formerly named AVCO Embassy Pictures:

a) The Graduate

b) The Fog

c) Escape From New York

d) The Howling (film)

e) Raw Deal (1986 film)

f) Manhunter (film)

g) Evil Dead II

2. Movies from the defuncted EMI Films, the defuncted subsidiary of Thorn EMI:

a) The Deer Hunter

b) Highlander (film)

3. Movies from the defuncted Carolco Pictures formerly named Anabasis Investments

a) First Blood (film)

b) Rambo: First Blood Part II

c) Angel Heart

d) Red Heat (1988 film)

e) Rambo III

f) Lock Up (film)

g) Air America (film)

h) Total Recall (1990 film)

h) Jacob's Ladder (1990 film)

In the back of the DVD and Blu-Ray covers of those movies. As well as going to the official website of StudioCanal. Here I send you the Blu-Ray.com website links to check the back of some DVD and Blu-Ray covers of these mentioned movies that are owned by StudioCanal and it appears the Copyright symbol along the word StudioCanal/Canal+, that means StudioCanal is the real owner of these mentioned movies, and also the IMDB links to check the company credit of these mentioned movies owned by Studiocanal to check the StudioCanal name in the section all world wide, that it means distribution and ownership of Studiocanal; and finally, the link of StudioCanal website description of these mentioned movies

1. The Graduate:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Graduate-Blu-ray/323/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Graduate-Blu-ray/90213/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-graduate-1967/

2. The Deer Hunter:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Deer-Hunter-Blu-ray/206572/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Deer-Hunter-4K-Blu-ray/206573/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-deer-hunter-1978/

3. The Fog 1980 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/The-Fog-DVD/1073/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Fog-Blu-ray/61747/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-fog-1980/

4. Escape From New York:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Escape-from-New-York-DVD/21606/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Escape-from-New-York-Blu-ray/109611/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Escape-from-New-York-Blu-ray/12117/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/escape-from-new-york-1981/

5. The Howling 1981 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/The-Howling-DVD/130843/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Howling-Blu-ray/25056/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/the-howling-1981/

6. First Blood:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/First-Blood-DVD/1881/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/First-Blood-Blu-ray/61/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/First-Blood-4K-Blu-ray/214055/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083944/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/first-blood-1982/

7. Rambo: First Blood Part II:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Rambo-First-Blood-Part-II-Blu-ray/735/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Rambo-First-Blood-Part-II-4K-Blu-ray/214054/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/rambo-first-blood-part-ii-1985/

8. Rawl Deal 1986 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Raw-Deal-Blu-ray/11210/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091828/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/raw-deal-1986/

9. Highlander 1986 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Highlander-Blu-ray/14653/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Highlander-Blu-ray/141901/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091203/companycredits https://www.studiocanal.com/title/highlander-1986/

10. Manhunter 1986 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Manhunter-DVD/30811/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Manhunter-Blu-ray/17595/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/manhunter-1986/

11. Angel Heart:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Angel-Heart-Blu-ray/6864/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/angel-heart-1987/

12. Evil Dead II:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Evil-Dead-II-DVD/145507/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Evil-Dead-2-Blu-ray/27439/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0092991/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/evil-dead-ii-1987/

13. Red Heat 1988 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Red-Heat-DVD/6311/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Red-Heat-Blu-ray/6760/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Red-Heat-4K-Blu-ray/249618/

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095963/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/evil-dead-ii-1987/

14. Rambo III:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Rambo-III-DVD/18895/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Rambo-III-Blu-ray/736/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Rambo-III-4K-Blu-ray/214053/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/rambo-iii-1988/

15. Lock Up film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Lock-Up-Blu-ray/11357/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/lock-up-1989/

16. Total Recall 1990 film:

https://www.blu-ray.com/dvd/Total-Recall-DVD/1737/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Total-Recall-Blu-ray/85/

https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Total-Recall-4K-Blu-ray/257346/

https://www.studiocanal.com/title/total-recall-1990/

That’s all i have to say. Ivo Reátegui (talk) 19:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, StudioCanal is the owner of these films, but the main reason why I reverted your edits was because-

1. StudioCanal has a section named "Selected films produced by StudioCanal or associated companies", where you made some edits. The films mentioned were made by neither StudioCanal nor any associated company (StudioCanal owns only the films given or the library of a particular company, not the companies which produced/distributed a film now owned by StudioCanal).

2. Due to the same reason, these films cannot go in the "List of StudioCanal films" page as well.

I hope you understand now why I reverted your edits. Also, sorry for having responded to your message a little late, not everyone has spare time to reply to messages. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 08:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vice (2018) film

I fixed the missing references that I made on Vice (2018) on a genre change that you deleted a couple of days ago and re-added the original genre edit. I would like to thank you for removing the change in the first place, I always like feedback and since as you saw, I often forget references so the more times people tell me about missing references in my edits, the better I become as an editor. NSNW (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the references added for the genres, so I'll let them be for now. Also, people forget things at times, even I do, so it's fine, happens. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 03:00, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent changes

You appear to be inserting [[Affirm Films#Pure Flix|Pure Flix Entertainment]] into the "distributor" field of a number of films. If you follow that link, you'll find that Affirm Films's Pure Flix is a video-on-demand service, not a film distribution company, and that they only gained even that recently, so it was not there to distribute for the listed films. Please undo your edits and restore the link to Pure Flix Entertainment. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I thought Affirm Films acquired the streaming service and the film studio as well. Now that my confusion has been cleared, I will undo my edits. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 05:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal (That one}

I already reported THAT editor to AIV, and they've been blocked now. Crboyer (talk) 05:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thankfully, the block is indefinite. But I would suggest that their email access be disabled since they have also been threatening me over email. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 05:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked the blocking administrator to look into it. Crboyer (talk) 05:49, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Castle

Hey there, I just want to give this out. On the page of Dark Castle Entertainment, it says that they were involved with Dragon Eyes and Stash House, and even says so on the respective articles, however they do not appear on the posters, and I believe that is completely unsourced info. TheRavineStudios (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am uncertain about this. Even the articles for the aforementioned films state Dark Castle as a production company, and Joel Silver seems to have produced the films as well. I'll tally with some sources and get back to you. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 09:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems it's half true. This article on Screen Daily says Dark Castle and After Dark had a home video deal which included Dragon Eyes and Stash House. But, neither Dark Castle nor Silver Pictures made the films (as a production company), as I have found out from Variety, so I am thinking of removing info about that from the articles for the aforementioned films. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 09:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude. TheRavineStudios (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kanye West / Ye

The person legally named Ye is still generally known as Kanye West, so that's what we use in the article. Please see WP:COMMONNAME and Wikipedia:Official names for more information on this. -- The Anome (talk) 14:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cite error in The Last Days on Mars

Hi! In this edit you inserted a ref BOM, seemingly without defining it, which gives a cite error. See the reference section for the error. I don't know much about this film and intent of your edit, so I can't fix it myself. But perhaps two sources would be already enough? Cheers, --Ivla (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! Clumsy old me; I visited the page where I had made that edit and rectified it. Anyway, thanks for reminding me of this error, and I'll try being more careful when adding references to pages. Kudos! FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 03:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Universal Pictures films (2020–2029)

Hi there! Could you please help me understand why you reverted BattyBot's recent edit to List of Universal Pictures films (2020–2029)? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I did not want to revert your bot's edit to the page but was rather forced to. The issue was that an editor (whose name I am not mentioning in this reply) added some films to the list which are still in development and have not entered production as of yet. Per WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL, only films confirmed by reliable sources to have begun principal photography are to be listed in a list of films for the current decade made by a particular studio. As a result, I had to revert the user's edit. However, an edit by your bot came in the way and because the edit the user made was quite huge and I was unable to manually revert it, I was forced to revert your bot's edit before I could revert the user's edit. I hope you get my point about why I had to revert your bot's edit. Thank you for your time. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Leave me a message•Changes I have made)} 15:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FloorMadeOuttaFloor: Thanks for your quick reply. Next time, feel free to redo the bot's edit after completing your reversions, or just drop a note in the edit summary when you revert the bot's edit so the bot operator knows it's OK to redo the edit. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 16:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PVR Pictures logo 2019.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PVR Pictures logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spyglass Entertainment films

Is what I've added to the Seabiscuit and Bruce Almighty pages okay? I didn't add anything to the infobox on the former page because of the fact that the distribution was a three-way tie between Universal, DreamWorks and Spyglass, but the latter was fine because Spyglass handled all international sales.

But I'm asking if I cluttered the pages a bit too much because I think I may have done so. Luigitehplumber (talk) 00:26, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly speaking, I don't see any clutter on these two pages, especially the information in the Release section, which I feel is sufficient. I would however suggest a minor change to the Bruce Almighty edit (thank you for making those changes by the way).

The Variety article cited states, "Spyglass Entertainment is reteaming with Universal Pictures to co-finance and handle foreign distribution on its upcoming Tom Shadyac-helmed comedy “Bruce Almighty.”" On the basis of this information, I suggest the term "Worldwide" be changed to "International" instead as the latter would mean they distributed worldwide outside the U.S. and Canada while the former suggests they distributed worldwide including the U.S. and Canada. Hope this helps. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 10:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Luigitehplumber (talk) 12:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PVR Cinemas logo 2019.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PVR Cinemas logo 2019.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More minor fixes about the pre-May 1986 MGM film library

Hey, FloorMadeOuttaFloor, can you remove the second "owned by MGM itself", add the "and" next to the "Electric Dreams", and place both of them next to the "owned by MGM itself via Orion Pictures"? 24.114.27.103 (talk) 10:58, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About that, I once saw the back of a Blu-ray of the film from Second Sight Films and the copyright on it was registered to MGM itself, the main reason why I didn't place it in the "owned via Orion Pictures" category. Hope this helps. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 11:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad. Can you remove the second "owned by MGM itself" category, add the "and" word, place both this and the "Electric Dreams" category next to the first "owned by MGM itself" category, and replace the "via Orion Pictures" category with the "with ownership of the former handled through Orion Pictures" category on the Turner Entertainment Co. catalog via the pre-May 1986 MGM library, remove the "pre-1959" category on the RKO Radio Pictures library, add the minority stake of the Spyglass Media Group catalog to the list, and add the "(49%)" and "film" categories to the Flagship Entertainment Group catalog at List of libraries owned by Warner Bros. Discovery? 24.114.36.38 (talk) 01:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made minor fixes regarding Electric Dreams on that page and the one for MGM, don't see any other problem; RKO distributed films on its own till 1959 and any films after are all co-prods owned by their original distributors, Warner-Flagship co-productions are owned by Warner and Spyglass' films are mostly owned by their original distributors (Four Christmases from New Line and Invictus are owned by Warner). FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 07:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

24.114.27.103 is evading a block, and has now been rangeblocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warner Bros. owned a 49% stake of Flagship Entertainment Group

Warner Bros. owns a 49% stake of Flagship Entertainment Group. Please add the "49%" and "film" categories to the Flagship Entertainment Group catalog at List of libraries owned by Warner Bros. Discovery. 24.114.38.187 (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Coyote vs. Acme

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Coyote vs. Acme, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V

Hello. When you add a new fact to Wikipedia, please cite the published source where you found it. See WP:V. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KikoRiki vandal

Happy New Year. I don't like to spoil it, but that KikoRiki vandal has came back re-adding Team Invincible to List of American films of 2012 and all international versions of Wikipedia. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, just great. Well, I'm a bit busy in real life as well but just know I'm still there keeping a watch on this nuisance and will take action wherever possible and necessary. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 06:00, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Sundance Barnstar for you

	Sundance Barnstar
	Thanks for working on the Sundance film article Ibelin (film)~ Fuzheado \| Talk 19:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 28 Days Later, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew MacDonald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gasoline Rainbow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mubi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an article for Werner Film Productions.

Hi there, i saw that you removed BBC Studios mentions on the Werner Film Productions shows that an IP user added last week. I'm asking you very nicely that if you can create an article for Werner Film Productions and create a category for the shows that Werner Film Productions produced. 148.252.147.184 (talk) 09:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you left behind a similar message related to StudioCanal on Harry's page too. Serious question: why don't YOU do it mate? Anyone can make a draft, anyone. Just start a draft with the name of the company, fill in info (with appropriate and reliable sources) and try to nominate it for publishing (must meet notability guidelines though). I apologize but I'm not an expert at creating pages so this is all I have for you. Besides, I'm not free all day (although you may see my edits frequently). Try your hand in the sandbox first and then shoot your shot at a draft. Earnest request: please don't ask people to do stuff just because you wanna have it done; there's no harm in trying yourself. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 11:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was what I was thinking as well. Why does this IP user (who I suspect has hopped through IPs before) make other users do his bidding? Doesn’t they know that we all have other things to do in life? (the same thing I said when the IP user asked me to edit the StudioCanal page) Luigitehplumber (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Genuinely intriguing case. I've stumbled across at least two other IPs (which I feel are however unrelated, given the location of this IP range and the other were different) asking other editors to do similar stuff (adding information about film libraries). Despite significant reverts, this IP appears to be dominant, which could develop into an edit war if not handled properly. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 13:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It could very well be like that. This person really needs to understand that they can simply create and edit pages themselves and maybe make their own account. But who knows? Anything goes. Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:39, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need help with this please

I see that you redid my vision on Eden lake but on allmovie it’s listed as both horror thriller but since I’m awful at coding I can’t get it to work, could you maybe add it, please thank you Pomniismywife (talk) 07:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that's a problem as I'm facing difficulties with my internet at the moment. You can see WP:CITE (or WP:REFB, which is more suitable for beginners) for guidelines on how to add references. FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(Converse here)} 16:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that there’s been conflict over the issue of the films genre

I suggest we keep the term ‘horror thriller’ as it was kept like that for years and I brought in a reliable source for proof, I would’ve added 3 more sources but I don’t wanna flood the edit system, do you agree? Pomniismywife (talk) 02:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed updates for Dark Castle Entertainment

Hi FloorMadeOuttaFloor, I am trying to update the Dark Castle Entertainment article. I see that you made some edits to the article in the past, so I thought you might be interested in helping to update the page. I hope you will consider implementing the edit request I posted at Talk:Dark Castle Entertainment#Proposed updates. Thanks for your help, DJ for Katz (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Shelley Duvall

On 18 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Shelley Duvall, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canary Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Materialists (film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PepGuardi (talk • contribs) 12:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Cinecom

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cinecom, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Girl with the Needle

added a link pointing to Variety

Vermiglio (film)

added a link pointing to Variety

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add international distributors to the Production and Release sections?

With that being said, I think that this is necessary just so that people can be less confused by putting it into the Distributor section except for the origin of the country when the international distributors that aren't from the origin of country should be put into the Production or/and Release sections into some, not all movies. That's all I have for now. 71.208.181.74 (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Header and actual suggestion are giving off apples and oranges, but I'll try my best to give my thoughts on this.
Listing such info in the Production and Release section depends on relevant it is to the article and how helpful it could be to a reader; downside to this could be the fact that people tend to look at the infobox more than the body of the article to find out.
As for the infobox, I'd suggest listing distributors, if uniform, and not sales agents. For example, the film Manchester by the Sea was sold internationally by Sierra/Affinity, but acquired by various third parties, especially majors such as Sony Pictures and Universal Pictures. Thus, list such companies only in certain cases such as co-prods, although it is likely that it may get removed sooner or later; see 12 Years a Slave for instance.
To sum it up, distributors are completely fine to add with proof and suitable context (don't forget WP:FILMDIST), but proceed with caution for sales agents. Cheerio! FloorMadeOuttaFloor ^{(go ahead, make my day)} 15:12, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]