User talk:GentleDjinn

Welcome

Hello, GentleDjinn, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Darkness Shines (talk) 17:56, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

GentleDjinn, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi GentleDjinn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors.

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

GentleDjinn: I am not Lagoo sab

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GentleDjinn I read about a suspicion of being a sockpuppet of Lagoo sab, which I am not. I even never heard of him or her before today. Regards GentleDjinn (talk) 10:51, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henri Goovaerts

Hello GentleDjinn,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Henri Goovaerts for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Gfosankar (talk) 14:43, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That was way too quick on the draw; the article does make a valid claim and it's not that hard to find some sources. GentleDjinn, I tweaked your Tjeerd Bottema a little and I just wrote up Swiebertje. Please add references to reliable sources to the articles you create, if only to stave off overeager editors. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote Prix de Rome (Netherlands) for you so those redlinks turn blue and a claim of importance is more easily seen. But I have to insist that you stop creating articles without a single reference--it creates huge amounts of work for other editors, esp. if you rely on those other editors to help prevent deletion of what you just created. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Wikilinking "painting" in an article on a painter is not very helpful. Maintaining that it is is a bit silly. Please add edit summaries to your edits. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pier Pander, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queen Wilhelmina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Nuclear Security Summit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Very Up & Co, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages German and Expat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adriaan Theodoor Peperzak, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Louvain and Bonaventura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GentleDjinn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of fictional robots and androids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbarella. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply: the text refers to two other pages, both he Barbarella comics and film. So far it still seems right to me. However, I do not understand yet the reference to Overwatch. GentleDjinn (talk) 10:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Ooms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Market Garden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airborne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GentleDjinn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gunnar Røsbø

The article Gunnar Røsbø has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Chetsford (talk) 22:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jan Knippenberg

The article Jan Knippenberg has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Chetsford (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jan Knippenberg

The article Jan Knippenberg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Arij Kop

Hi. I have moved your article to draft space because it does not yet meet the criteria for inclusion:

No references
No categories
Does not conform to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography guidelines

Please work on it in draft space before submitting for review. Deb (talk) 11:54, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was busy with it and since this nitpicking does not encourage me I quitGentleDjinn (talk) 11:55, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So much for "Gentle". Do I take it that you are not intending to work on the draft? If so, perhaps you would like me to delete it. Deb (talk) 12:34, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So shoot first and then ask questions, aye? GentleDjinn (talk) 09:09, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now where can I find back my text to continue with it? I have sufficient sources. GentleDjinn (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where is that draftspace? Did you delete it????????GentleDjinn (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GentleDjinn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Goûter Refuge) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Goûter Refuge.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Great article, but is there any possiblity of sourcing the info in the body with inline citations? I added a few to the lead sentence to demonstrate notability (so that it doesn't get flagged for deletion by sombody) but that doesn't help with the verifiability issue. Where are you getting you info about the Refuge? We should be citing the article's content as much as possible to reliable sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 12:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliments. See my latest edits. GentleDjinn (talk) 13:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Nid d'Aigle

Hello, GentleDjinn,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Nid d'Aigle! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 16:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goûter Hut - you beat me to it!

Hello. Over the last 18 months or so I've been working on a draft article on the Goûter Hut. But (grrr!) you beat me to it - so well done. Feel free to take a look at my draft and extract anything that may improve your article. See User:Nick Moyes/sandbox/Gouter. I'll take a more detailed look at your article in the weeks ahead and add anything you've missed off. (Were you aware of the random urine sampling for drug use that took place at the Goûter and Cosmiques Hut a few years ago?) It's fascinating stuff I'd not yet added to my own draft. By the way, per WP:COMMONNAME, and discussions at WP:WikiProject Alps, it would be more appropriate on en.wiki to have the article named Goûter Hut, not Goûter Refuge, but that's a minor point we can deal with later. I'm really chuffed to see the article, though obviously p*ssed off that I'd not published mine first! LOL.

Out of interest, are you also an alpinist? I've been up on the summit of Mont Blanc twice now, first via a traverse of the Aiguille de Bionnassay on the very day that Mikhail Gorbachev was held prisoner in Russia back in the early 1990s, and then a few years later by doing the fantastic Brenva Spur route from the now demolished Trident Hut at the time it was leaning some 10 degrees from the horizontal. I believe serious rockfall around Col Moore subsequently made the route a lot more difficult, if not impossible to access. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 03:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick Moyes:

Hi Nick, thanks for the reaction and accept my encouragement!

Now I unintendedly beat you at making this page, may I suggest that we dedicate it to the brave gendarmeries and chopper pilots of the Peloton de Gendarmerie de Haute Montagne of Chamonix-Mont Blanc and Saint-Gervais-les-Bains...? Let's work together on these pages; and invite other well informed contributors to join us here. I also read about those urine samples that you mention. I have to admit that there is a lot to mention around the mountain that is peculiar, but also not all equally relevant. Ignorants bringing children to the mountain and Kilian Jornet's livestream on Facebook were imho more important worrisome incidents than e.g. the aborted ideas of a tv-show or some cult to have a spiritual gathering therre, to mention just two.

About yours truly: I roamed there several seasons at younger age, in the '80s - and had my share of safe return celebrations with Panaches in NashBar and unforgettable adventures at higher elevations as well, that I obviously survived (also to enjoy the absence here on the English Wikipedia of the dominant mediocres that unfortunately are rampant on the Wikipedia in my mother language...), including the honour to assist the gendarmerie in the recovery of the lifeless body of a poor chap who I saw falling down a few hundred meters in that properly named Couloir of Death (later heard he lost his balance when he hooked a crampon in his trousers - I fully understand why a Norwegian brand calling itself Amundsen Sports still makes breeches...) and second degree frostbite on all my fingers during a winter climb on the Tacul in 1983 or '84 to which I blame my terrible handwriting (for those who want to know: I do not long for new experiences for comparison, but the hospital in Chamonix-Mont Blanc is probably the best in the world that you can find for the treatment of frostbite, if you happen to be in the neighbourhood...).

I hope that you agree that there also moral issues around here: I imagine responsible contributions here might prevent dramatic shortenings of lives by offering others useful information before they go astray in the beautiful but also gruesome nature: in many things adults have to decide theirselves how reckless they want to be or how they want to abuse their freedom or risk their lives, but hey also lives of others can get involved (caillou!)! I hope that you agree that decisions should at least be properly informed.

That 15 year long inexorable campaign of the esteemed Mayor of Saint-Gervais-les-Bains has my sympathy. However, I can also follow his critics who object against the regulations and refer to principal aspects and facets, but Monsieur Jean-Marie Peillex certainly enriched our vocabulary with that memorable term "pseudo-liberties"; my pov is that human lives should not be sacrificed or given up because of some theoretical or academical debate about freedom that itself takes place in a comfortable, warm and safe environment. Anyway, I will enjoy reading your draft there as well. 09:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Its great to meet another (ageing) mountaineer here! I do have respect for those involved in mountain rescue, especially the unpaid volunteers; an experienced alpinist friend of mine spent some time in Cham hospital after she and her husband were trapped for some days after falling into a crevasse on a descent of the Aiguille Grises route. Although I was out climbing in the Swiss Alps this year, I, too, now realise I'm not as strong or even as motivated as I once was to climb the harder summits. Having done about 70% of the main 4000m sunmits, I shall never reach my goal of climbing them all. So it's good to relive some of those times by researching and adding content to Alps-related pages. However, we must remember this is a factual encyclopaedia, and cannot be used to promote our own views on a subject unless they have been written about by independent sources.

You might like to look at Mont Blanc massif which I turned from a simple list to a WP:GA, and had addressed all but one issue (on topic ordering) in my WP:FA nomination when it was pulled for time reasons. I'd like to put it forward again next year after I've got more free time to look at it once more. Perhaps you'd like to help with that? I've not looked at the page on Mont Blanc for a while, but it was in dire need of improvement, and certainly gets more traffic than 'my' massif article. I think the way forward with that one is to agree a proposed structure of headings and subheadings, and then work to move existing content around before adding new sourced material.

The mayor is StGlB is an interesting person. To some extent, he appears to have enhanced the tourism potential (and income) of the commune, but now moans when incompetent people are inevitably attracted to the area. I understand the talk on restrictions on the Gouter Route, though this would sound less hollow were the efforts of Espace Mont Blanc to gain registration for the massif as a World Heritage Site to be properly supported by the three countries, who probably don't want it to restrict their further development plans. All this is my POV, and not appropriate for an encyclopaedia article, of course.

Do consider adding your name to the small list of contributors at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mountains of the Alps, and perhaps drop a note on the talk page to alert people of some of your recent alps-related pages? We like the opportunity of seeing new content. Its not a hugely active group per se, but some of its members have made great contributions. So please join us. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick Moyes: Thanks for your kind reply with suggestions. Now there is no red link anymore to Jean-Marc Peillex anymore! I will come back to the rest later.GentleDjinn (talk) 12:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well done, but I'd quite like to 'draftify' it if that's OK with you until you/we can add some content about the person, not the campaigns/issues he's been involved in? Had I encountered this in my normal WP:NPP role, I'd be concerned that it doesn't yet prove notability (an issue that stopped me making an article on him - and not speaking much French to understand sources). The article needs to be about him, not expand on other issues per WP:COATRACK), and at a quick skim I can only see this reference that actually talks a little about him. I'm not sure whether being mayor de facto gives him notability - I suspect not. (In WP:NPOLITICIAN we might be able to claim he meets "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage" - but the coverage needs to be about him, more than the issues he campaigns on. I can't believe there aren't some good biographies in some French newspapers about him, rather than deaths on MB. I think we still need a few more - but a relly great effort - and you clearly work a lot faster than I do!!! Let me know what you think. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick Moyes:

Well as far as I see any relevance of the esteemed M. Peillex for the English Wikipedia it is exactly related to his long campaign for the regulation that now seems to take form. Of course there are lots of issues in his municipality, but they would not be relevant here, imho (not even details about his political inclinations, I might say, but please correct me if necessary). Let's see if a page about him emerges on the French Wikipedia and what other (sourced) information will appear there, that might be considered to be added here as well. 17:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Btw, you mentioned were on the Mont Blanc via a traverse of the Aiguille de Bionnassay: the Miage route? Isn't that also worth an own page, just like the Grand Mulets and Gonella routes? GentleDjinn (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Goûter Route on Mont Blanc) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Goûter Route on Mont Blanc.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Great work. It would be great if you could improve the detail of the references, which are rather minimal at present.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nick Moyes}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 03:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick Moyes:

Jean-Marc Peillex

I noticed the red link to Jean-Marc Peillex in your new article on Goûter Route on Mont Blanc (which I have reviewed and renamed to help it being found). I've been mulling over creating a page on this outspoken mayor of Saint Gervais les Bains, but was aware sources specifically about him in English were rather sparse, and that fr.wiki doesn't even have a page on him yet. Any thoughts? Nick Moyes (talk) 04:02, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just those four words (excuse my French... :-) ): Je vais le créer.GentleDjinn (talk) 09:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the moment this looks sufficient to me. Now we have Goûter Route on Mont Blanc, Goûter Hut and Jean-Marc Peillex. 13:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)~

Rocher de la Tournette moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rocher de la Tournette, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DannyS712 (talk) 21:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DannyS712:

Unfortunately you seem not to be aware (yet) that this is exactly the case with all topographical topics. Frankly, I don't see enough sources etc. about the existence of the whole planet Earth either. May I suggest that you ask questions before shooting and kindly request you to put it back? Happy new year.

(Rules should be practiced with reason. Unfortunately, presumptive mediocrity and such ridiculous hyperskepsis also dwells on the English Wikipedia. Recommended reading: How to do things with rules by William Twining and David Miers). Dear Danny, since 2012 there exists the page Top of the Mont Blanc, also on the Dutch and Catalan Wikipedia, without any source that mountains do have tops at all... : it is about a cherished piece of stone that allegedly comes from the summit of Mont Blanc, although that can not be the case. Here is your quote: "certum est quia impossibile est" - Tertullianus. (but who cares?)

That geological relic comes from the highest rock peak near the summit of Mont Blanc, and about which the French Wikipedia already has a page for years, since 2007 and the Italian since 2010, and the Spanish since 2011, of which you do not seem to be aware either. Feel free, show the guts to nag them there. Best wishes, GentleDjinn (talk) 09:15, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I need to clarify for you that the rock peak I am talking (writing) about, where that piece of stone comes from, is the Rocher de la Tournette or else the claimed origin of that piece of stone should be deemed a hoax. Unfortunately, although the Rocher de la Tournette can be found on many maps that are detailed enough, I do not know any sources as evidence that hoaxes are real things of this world either. After checking those pages in the Catalan, Italian, Spanish and Dutch Wikipedia about that stone and the Rocher de la Tournette , we can start the new year wasting our energy with this inspiring page Appeal to the stone .

The Rocher de la Tourette is also mentioned on several other pages in the English Wikipedia (I can count 6 occurences), as well as in the French and Italian Wikipedias where nobody at all sees this peak as a stumbling block whatsoever (same with most mountains or other topographical topics). Please see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Alpine_four-thousanders#Enlarged_list , and for non of the peaks mentioned there I notice any sources at all about their existence, while to the contrary I see lots of sources mentioned on Wikipedia for the "existence" of fictitious places: e.g. Places in Harry Potter, Category:Lists of fictional locations Category:Fictional universes.

GentleDjinn (talk) 11:08, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further to our conversation and some suggestionsd on my talk page, I've spent the evening working on this and related (Gouter) articles, and have now added a set of references and an infobox and the main spur route into it. I not there is also an extreme Gaston Rebuffat route listed in my Alpine Club climbing guide, but I don't think that's hugely necessary. I also noted my guide gave the route a PD rating , but modern online sources give it AD - and I can well eblieve it. PD seems far too easy for that extremely remote and potentially avalanche-prone area. Anyway, the page has been moved back into mainspace and I've NPP-ed it, too. Cheers, Nick Moyes (talk) 03:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will have a look at your talk page. About its morphological interest, I suspect (dare to predict), that the Rocher(s) de la Tournette and its surroundings might be a kind of small litmus test as empirical falsification / confirmation for the climate change. If the ice keeps melting, more rocks are likely protude to it over there, closer to the summit. The Bosses might also become two small peaks or buttresses in stead of snowy camel humps...?GentleDjinn (talk) 05:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hermanos en el Camino moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hermanos en el Camino, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 13:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Non-Aligned Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Amrullah Saleh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Panjshir

Ashraf Ghani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Logar

Mohammad Hanif Atmar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Laghman

Rahmatullah Nabil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wardak

Yunus Qanuni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Panjshir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uprising

The text was moved to Talk:2019 Venezuela uprising, because I cannot tell what the text means and there was no source, and since you are providing a source I can't access, I still can't tell what the text means. Please see talk discussion. You seem to be using a primary source that has not been reported by a secondary source. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:41, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You just had to be patient. But it is a subtle diplomatic request to other states not to interfere. GentleDjinn (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nacht van Vlaanderen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nacht van Vlaanderen, does not have any sources and citations as written. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:33, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the templating. It is just that this has no citations added in the hour it is has been in mainspace. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:35, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've also moved Jean-Paul Praet to draft space, as it is currently an unsourced BLP. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:36, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved some other of you recent creations to draft space. Once they have citations, please feel free to move them back to mainspace. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I find that draftspace? GentleDjinn (talk) 12:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tirade (magazine) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tirade (magazine), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:45, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I find that draftspace? GentleDjinn (talk) 12:35, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Goûter Route (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Traverse

Piet Paaltjens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Anonymous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arij Kop

Are you sure you will have time to work on the draft at the moment? You seem to have a lot of others in progress. Why not wait until you are ready so it won't be automatically deleted again? Deb (talk) 12:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid question. Do I not need to have the text that I already wrote available for me in order to continue with it? Where is or was that draftspace? Bye.GentleDjinn (talk) 12:43, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe you can add my sources:

Arij Kop - Geuzenleider in Vlaardingen by Jan van Hees, van't Oft naar 't Oofs series Nr. 54
Donkere Jaren 3 by Jan Anderson and Hjalmar Teunissen
https://www.tracesofwar.nl/articles/2294/Geuzenverzet.htm

Ways to improve Blankenburg (Rozenburg)

Hello, GentleDjinn,

Thanks for creating Blankenburg (Rozenburg)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on De Wallen

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from several different online sources that are not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, quite a bit of content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting is no copyright infringement. 08:34, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

That's true, but that's not what this was. Please see the page history for the violations from six different sources that I had to remove from the article. None of these were quotations. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Borealism

Hi there! I see that Haukurth removed your paragraph on borealism from myth. I think his choice was sensible, but it would be good to make a Wikipedia entry for borealism. I should have time to start one off myself if you like, but would be very happy if you'd like to do it yourself? Thanks for your editorial work :-) Alarichall (talk) 17:45, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alaric! I notice GentleDjinn has been working on Boreal (politics and culture). Haukur (talk) 17:53, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for the heads up :-) Alarichall (talk) 04:01, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Present solution on page borealism seems quite acceptable. GentleDjinn (talk) 11:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Tobias moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fritz Tobias, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 07:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not disturb my editing GentleDjinn (talk) 07:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Your addition to Fritz Tobias has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This accusation is sheer nonsense. GentleDjinn (talk) 04:59, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sound of Music (Laibach album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Slovene and Legendary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ss.Ss.Ss.Q.E.S.M. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ss.Ss.Ss.Q.E.S.M., does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 13:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tren transoceánico a Bucaramanga moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tren transoceánico a Bucaramanga, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 13:57, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tyrannicide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creating redirects

Hello. When creating redirect pages, please follow the instructions at Help:Redirect so that they actually work as redirects and don't look like errors. Thanks! Geolodus (talk) 06:15, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jean-Paul Praet concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jean-Paul Praet, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Forum (Dutch literary magazine) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Forum (Dutch literary magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nacht van Vlaanderen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nacht van Vlaanderen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:G.A. van Oorschot concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:G.A. van Oorschot, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Het Vaderland concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Het Vaderland, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tirade (magazine) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tirade (magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij (November 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeneralPoxter was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeneralPoxter (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jean-Paul Praet

Hello, GentleDjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jean-Paul Praet".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Forum (Dutch literary magazine)

Hello, GentleDjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Forum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nacht van Vlaanderen

Hello, GentleDjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nacht van Vlaanderen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 05:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:G.A. van Oorschot

Hello, GentleDjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "G.A. van Oorschot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Het Vaderland

Hello, GentleDjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Het Vaderland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 07:00, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tirade (magazine)

Hello, GentleDjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tirade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 11:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ss.Ss.Ss.Q.E.S.M. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ss.Ss.Ss.Q.E.S.M., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tren transoceánico a Bucaramanga concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tren transoceánico a Bucaramanga, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tren transoceánico a Bucaramanga

Hello, GentleDjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tren transoceánico a Bucaramanga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ss.Ss.Ss.Q.E.S.M.

Hello, GentleDjinn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ss.Ss.Ss.Q.E.S.M.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij has been accepted

Westlandsche Stoomtramweg-Maatschappij, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]