User talk: Gihan Jayaweera

Gihan Jayaweera's Talk Page

Thursday

21 November 2024

09:52 UTC

Archives

/Archive 1
/Archive 2
/Archive 3
/Archive 4
/Archive 4
/Archive 5
/Archive 6
/Archive 7
/Archive 8
/Archive 9
/Archive 10
/Archive 11
/Archive 12
/Archive 13
/Archive 14

Proposed deletion of La Colère dans le vent

The article La Colère dans le vent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Documentary that appears to fail WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since October 2021

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:05, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bouzié

The article Bouzié has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:09, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bouzié for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bouzié is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bouzié until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DonaldD23 talk to me 22:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ravi Rajapaksha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ravi Rajapaksha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 17:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heino Schmidt moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Heino Schmidt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 23:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alborada (film) release year

Hello! The article Alborada (film) states that the film premiered at the 2021 Tokyo International Film Festival, thus the film should be classified as a 2021 film per MOS:FILM. We use the first public showing as the release year, not the theatrical release year as not all films receive theatrical releases. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY2008 12:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sindi Buthelezi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sindi Buthelezi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sindi Buthelezi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miyasi Sandeepani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miyasi Sandeepani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miyasi Sandeepani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chanaka L (talk) 09:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Nadungamuwa Raja

On 14 March 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Nadungamuwa Raja, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 19:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Minodh de Sylva

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Minodh de Sylva, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jebel Nyoka

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jebel Nyoka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Noah Cohen

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noah Cohen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bhekisizwe Mahlawe

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhekisizwe Mahlawe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bradman Ediriweera

Hi Gihan, hope you're well. I wonder if you could find any Sri Lankan sources to expand the above cricketers article? He made 171 first-class/List A appearances in his career, so there should be something I'd imagine. In English language sources, there isn't too much about him. StickyWicket (talk) 16:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: 2021 Months of African Cinema Contest Winners

Greetings!

After successfully completing the 2021 Months of African Cinema Global Contest on 30 November 2021, we are happy to announce the winners in the contest!

Over 4,000 articles were created across 17 language Wikipedias, surpassing all expectations and placing the contest firmly as one of the most successful article-writing contests on Wikipedia. A big thank you to you and every single person who created articles during the period of the contest for making this happen!

All our winners have now been announced and you can check the complete list here. We'd still be contacting everyone who has won something separately to send over their prizes. Thank you so much for being part of this global event! –Jamie Tubers (talk) 21:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Noah Cohen

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Noah Cohen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bhekisizwe Mahlawe

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhekisizwe Mahlawe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:52, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maysaa Almumin

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maysaa Almumin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maysaa Almumin

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maysaa Almumin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:54, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scot Cooper (actor)

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scot Cooper (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tony Caprari

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tony Caprari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hero Nidahas Trophy 2017-18 official logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hero Nidahas Trophy 2017-18 official logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imen Nouel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imen Nouel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imen Nouel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ploni (talk) 22:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Francois Lensley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francois Lensley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francois Lensley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 19:19, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lamine Dieng

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lamine Dieng, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tony Caprari

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tony Caprari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 21:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International cricket in 1899–1900

The article International cricket in 1899–1900 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Despite being about international cricket tours, no international tours took place during this time, per the article itself

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Munezero Aline for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Munezero Aline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munezero Aline until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Close paraphrasing

The material I fixed here was not acceptably paraphrased from the source. Ovinus (talk) 06:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2022 Legends League Cricket official poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2022 Legends League Cricket official poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Heino Schmidt

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Heino Schmidt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Heino Schmidt

Hello, Gihan Jayaweera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heino Schmidt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hambantota Troopers current squad

Template:Hambantota Troopers current squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 13:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Galle Guardians current squad

Template:Galle Guardians current squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Colombo Commandos current squad

Template:Colombo Commandos current squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:15, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kurunegala Warriors current squad

Template:Kurunegala Warriors current squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been warned again, and again, and again that copyright violations are not acceptable, and since you're utilizing foreign language sources, following copyright is of even greater importance. Your latest update at Visangamanaya here is a blatant word-for-word machine translation from here. This is not acceptable. You have a Copyright Investigation on you dating back to 2015, and yet, seven years later, you haven't learned since. The block is indefinite as you have shown no desire to fix your issues. Wizardman 00:47, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen that you blocked me indefinitely. It is definitely heart breaing incidence. I have loved wikipedia since my little age and i have done editing since teen age. If you are thinking that I am not worthy for editing, then I am deeply saddened from that. Aftter 2015, are there any copyroght violations?. I dont think so. I have given my fulltime dedication to uplift my small country among other countried by making edits. (Ex. 2022 in Sri Lanka). Those plot edits are translations from Sinhala. I know that.but, my heart breaks, when you indefinitely blocked me. Always do not try to see the bad thing, see some good things as well. How many new articles I have created. Also, i won a competition about AfroCinema. I have awarded some good wiki awards. Hope you will give me a chance. Ever since there are guidelines given to me wikipedia, i have corrected them. Thank you. GihanJayaweera^TALK 14:27, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've had two already - in fact, I can't think of a good reason why you weren't blocked after the CCI was reopened. MER-C 19:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

so you are telling me, I am not worthy to be a wikipedian. I can't make even a small edit rather than making articles.?? I am completely heart broken about your thoughts. I told that, I can change. But you all are thinking I will not.. GihanJayaweera^TALK 02:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not adding copyright problems is a non-negotiable part of being a Wikipedian and always has been. You can still get unblocked - you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that you will not add copyvios again via the unblock process. See User:Yunshui/decline copyvio for what your appeal should contain. MER-C 19:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested for regaining my editing rights. Can you just check it. I can't even message to another editor or administrator. This is the only place that I can write. Hope you will understand. Thank You. GihanJayaweera^TALK 14:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why no one reply me to uplift my block. I have faith on you all. I am disappointed about myself for my past. Give me a single chance to prove my worthiness. GihanJayaweera^TALK 14:47, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gihan Jayaweera (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing this to lift my block from Wikipedia and become eligible to edit again. :What is copyright? :In my sense, copyright means that any content is legally protected by using from others in their sources without knowing the original copyright holder. This can be found in scientific assignments, photographs, or any other media. : :How is Wikipedia licenced? :There are many licence I have seen in Wikipedia, such as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). :Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? :Because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia which is a place to share the global information. Then, due to being a free licenced and free editing wikipedians, there cannot beany copyrighted content used in Wikipedia. Also, the information of the original author or website is made after extensive workload, and it is not ethical to take them without the acceptance of original author. :Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? :If the original author gives the permission, then it can be used, still under some conditions given in Wikipedia such as "GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)", and non-commercial purposes. :How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future? :I have done some bad things as well as good things to Wikipedia. Since my start at the teen age, I have done very wrong things by uploading some one's photos as my ones. But I have accepted that and did not upload any photo after that. As admins stated, there were two late incidences of copyright cases (not about uploading photos), where I could not interfere for one of them due to my busy schedule in 2015. Also, I did not know greatly about those copyright laws. But with time, I have changed. I am learning from every mistake. I have won the AfroCinema 2021 global competition as well with my full dedication to be a memorable Wikipedian. Also, I have awarded the "The Sri Lankan Barnstar of National Merit", "Sri Lankan Wikipedian of the Year 2019", "The Writer's Barnstar", "The Original Barnstar" and "The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar". I have a great love on Wikipedia, and proud to say that, I am a Wikipedian for nine years since 2013. I am sorry about everything I have done so far and I hope that I can edit again and become a proud Wikipedian. I will correct every bad habit during edits in the future. Thank You

Decline reason:

This misses all of WP:FAIRUSE. Additionally, I'm concerned about your statement, "without knowing the original copyright holder", as that is either nonsense or incorrect, but I suspect simply indicates that you badly worded your understanding. That is, you may be correct but didn't word your point clearly enough for us to understand. Yamla (talk) 16:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am sorry if I got something wrong. In that statment, I said that "information can be posted without knowing the copyright holder. As an example, if there is a research article, someone can include that part by gaining the permission from original author." May be my understanding is different, because I am not from an English-speaking country. Some laws and content in that WP:FAIRUSE cannot understand completely. What I can promise is that, I will never ever make copyright infringment for photos, taking from local newspapers, etc. I will edit with my own words and use only the links as citations. I can assure that. Very sorry if I am troubling you all. GihanJayaweera^TALK 22:06, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gihan Jayaweera (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing this to lift my block from Wikipedia and become eligible to edit again. I am deeply sorry about all the wrong things done in the past. I am truely disappointed about myself about them. I don't know how to convince to take my editing rights back. But I can assure that, I will refrain from every copyright cases. I will use my own words during editing. Hope you all will understand. I am saying again, I am sorry about my past.

Decline reason:

Copyright is special in that it has legal ramifications. You can't just say "I'm sorry"; you have to be able to demonstrate your understanding of how English Wikipedia handles copyright. If you have trouble understanding our policies, you should consider editing the version of Wikipedia in your native language. There's nothing special about English Wikipedia. It's not the "prestige version" of Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:56, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gihan Jayaweera (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing this to lift my block from Wikipedia and become eligible to edit again. I have read all the links supplied to me regarding "Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks". :What is copyright? :Copyright means that any verbal, wordy or graphical content which is legally protected by using from others. Copyright does not allows commercial copying, modification and redistribution of any content. I have done some previous mistakes on copyright cases in both wordy and image aspects. Admins have warned me about violating copyright policy and I am taking their advices. Honestly, I am learning new things in every time from this kind of help given by many local and foreign admins and reviewers. I obey their advices a lot. In this instance, I have inspected in two times in 2015 and 2018 regarding some copyright cases. Yes, it is true that I could not corporate with that. I don't remember what happened during those days. (may be too busy with my graduation from the university). Anyway, I accept that. That is why I am asking about giving permission again to be a right, obedient and understandable wikipedian. I know that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and its goal is to use "free content". That means, not commercial or non-copyrighted works can be added and modified. I will do that in the future. Definitely. I will not add any wordy or copyrighted images from any local or international web sites, books, blogs, etc. I will made prose and make articles with my own words, where the primary and secondary sources are given only as references. As given in Wikipedia, Free content for unlimited distribution, modification and application by all users in all media is fine. The admins can block me in the future, if I am breaking the copyright policy fault again. I request "good faith" from every admin towards me that any person needs one chance to become good again. I accept this block in rest of my life and Wikipedia life, and I promise it definitely will never happen again. I agree all the copyright terms and conditions imposed to me by admins and Wikipedia. I have no any anger towards the blocked admin as well as others about this. Because I made this by myself. If admins lift my block, just study me and check whether I am doing the same thing again. I will upload photos only taken by me under "Image use policy". I will write with my own words. I love English wikipedia a lot as well as to Sinhala wikipedia. So blocking me from English wikipedia is truly heart breaking. But this will be a learning curve for me. Because it hurts more. I have understand "Wikipedia's copyright policy and policies regarding how to use non-free content." This is my third request. I don't know continuous requests block me again. But Wikipedia means a lot to me and my life. You can search my editing history and see how much love is there and bond with Wikipedia since 2013. Thank You so much. GihanJayaweera^TALK 21:27, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I could be mistaken but I think you still haven't discussed WP:FAIRUSE. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gihan Jayaweera (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am relly heartbroken by this. I cannot make any edit, even a small one. But Ihave told how much I love wikipedia for many years. but no one is realizing that. always saying keep faith, but no one is there to give one last chance. everyone is relying on explain, explain, fair use....etc. But give me one chance, and i will obey everything.but no one is giving that opportunity

Decline reason:

Looking at [1], a 2014 revision of your talk page, and searching for the term "copyright" is a quite eye-opening experience. Everything is there: A warning for image copyright violations, a warning for text copyright violations full of advice, a final warning for copyright violations. Looking at [2] afterwards is quite shocking. While you can't do so anymore, the only action anyone needs to take to replicate that diff is to open [3], copy the website text into Google Translate, Singhalese -> English, and add a citation to the result. No quotation marks, nothing indicating this has been copied from the source.

And this leaves me with the following impression: Your editing was damaging the encyclopedia, and the "many years" are not positive in this regard. It should have led to a block much earlier to prevent the damage you did over the years. You ask for "one chance" when you've had too many already. There is nothing we can do for you at this point. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Thilanka Rathnayake

The article Thilanka Rathnayake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No actual claim to notability, and no sign of meeting WP:BASIC. An advertisement masquerading as an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bonadea contributions talk 13:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thilanka Rathnayake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thilanka Rathnayake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thilanka Rathnayake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

bonadea contributions talk 14:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Numidia Lezoul

The article Numidia Lezoul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This actress is absent from the artistic scene, and her biography is not enough to create an article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Gihan Jayaweera!

Happy New Year!

Gihan Jayaweera,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 18:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Zimbabwe ODI cricket records by opponent

Template:Zimbabwe ODI cricket records by opponent has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Zimbabwe T20I cricket records by opponent

Template:Zimbabwe T20I cricket records by opponent has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juliya (film)

The article Juliya (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, tagged for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juliya (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juliya (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliya (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 21:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edgar-Yves

The article Edgar-Yves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 00:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Morphological symptoms of plant diseases

Hello Gihan Jayaweera! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Morphological symptoms of plant diseases, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://oms.bdu.ac.in/ec/admin/contents/141_P16MB22_2020060511571037.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Morphological symptoms of plant diseases and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Morphological symptoms of plant diseases, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Morphological symptoms of plant diseases. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Morphological symptoms of plant diseases with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Morphological symptoms of plant diseases saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:49, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ntokozo Dlamini for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ntokozo Dlamini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ntokozo Dlamini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:28, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afghanistan Test cricket records by opponent

Template:Afghanistan Test cricket records by opponent has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Spike 'em (talk) 15:15, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've also added the other 2 Afghan results templates to the Tfd. This is article content that belongs on the team page, not hidden away in a template. Spike 'em (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2018 Cricket World Cup Qualifier official logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2018 Cricket World Cup Qualifier official logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sinhala cinema

Template:Sinhala cinema has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Crossroads (2017 film)

The article Crossroads (2017 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM, all citations are databases, minor awards, or passing mentions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:12, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dedunu Akase film title cropped.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dedunu Akase film title cropped.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 10:58, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Podu season 2 title card.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Podu season 2 title card.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 11:05, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leila Kalanzi Kachapizo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leila Kalanzi Kachapizo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leila Kalanzi Kachapizo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mozzcircuit (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Freedom Trophy (Ind v SA).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freedom Trophy (Ind v SA).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Dea Liane

Hello Gihan Jayaweera, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dea Liane, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dea Liane.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sionk}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sionk (talk) 18:51, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anton Jude.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anton Jude.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anora (upcoming film)

The article Anora (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This film has been "upcoming" for over half a decade now. It has still not been publicly released to theatres or video. I see nothing that indicates the production itself is notable. Thus it should not have its own article, per WP:NFF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Οἶδα (talk) 19:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karin Van Der Laag for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karin Van Der Laag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karin Van Der Laag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:22, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aa Gaya Hero promotional poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aa Gaya Hero promotional poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adventures of Ricky Deen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adventures of Ricky Deen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventures of Ricky Deen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BOVINEBOY2008 21:26, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adventures of Ricky Deen official poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adventures of Ricky Deen official poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please find me pata kurullo full cast(talk)

Proposed deletion of Epidius (disambiguation)

The article Epidius (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:10, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]