User talk:Joaquinazo

Welcome!

Hi Joaquinazo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! HeyElliott (talk) 04:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Portal:Current events/2023 August 16, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zsohl ^(Talk) 17:00, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edit was constructive because Niger m’s insurgency is in the Sahel and not the Mahgreb.Joaquinazo (talk) 17:12, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move

Hello. Please do not move pages randomly and without justification [1]. Much less to a title with wrong capitalization. You also kept links to the old title everywhere. This action only made me waste my time. Please don't do it again, start a Wikipedia:Requested move if you think an article should have a different title. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 19:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iran–United States conflict (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Iran–United States relations instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iran–United States conflict and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 08:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joaquinazo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 08:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links

On what basis is 2023 American-Middle East conflict linked to Syrian Civil War? Mindthem (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian militias backed by Iran attacked American forces. With your logic, the December 2019 airstrikes wouldve not been in Syira. Its part of the American intervention Joaquinazo (talk) 15:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 American-Middle East conflict is more linked to 2023 Israel-Hamas war than Syrian Civil War. Those militias were motivated by the Israeli Hamas conflict, they did that in response to Israeli actions in Gaza but you went on to reverted the edits without looking into page’s talk, where there was a bit of discussion about the links of conflicts. As Wikipedians, we must be neutral, not aligned to any particular country or group. Mindthem (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not. It explicitly said don't link it to the Hamas war. It is more linked to the American intervention in the Syrian civil war Joaquinazo (talk) 16:09, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

By who? who said that? Joe Biden? Mindthem (talk) 16:13, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“These narrowly tailored strikes in self-defense were intended solely to protect and defend U.S. personnel in Iraq and Syria,” Mr. Austin said. “They are separate and distinct from the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, and do not constitute a shift in our approach to the Israel-Hamas conflict.” New York Times. Joaquinazo (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yaah by Austin right, but when doing analysis, you should look on both sides. The militias did attack in response to Israeli and American actions in and towards Gaza. He was saying so for political reasons, trying not escalate the situation and avoid American public resistance. Mindthem (talk) 16:47, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its like saying the September 11 attacks would be a part of the Arab–Israeli conflict and/or the other conflicts mentioned (Southern Lebanon, Kashmir, Chechenya) because it was motivated by them. Without them, 9/11 would've probably never happened. And 9/11 isnt universally considered to be a part of those.Joaquinazo (talk) 16:54, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

source for earlier statement - Joaquinazo (talk) 16:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read news articles from October 7, 2023 and make up your mind. We are not some kind of U.S propaganda outlet Mindthem (talk) 17:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How does the October 7 attack prove the point of Iraqi and Syrian militia attacks against the US - Joaquinazo (talk) 17:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said read news articles from October 7, so that you know situation as it is, not as you want it to be or what you are being told in USA by your government. Mindthem (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdou Sidikou Issa has been accepted

Abdou Sidikou Issa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]