User talk:Leopea

Roseanne final episode monologue

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roseanne final episode monologue, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Roseanne final episode monologue. Marasmusine (talk) 12:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Tate Show

Hi there. Noticed your edits to The Catherine Tate Show characters, one involving a revert of my edit. My reasoning for merging these stubs into the body of the article is it just makes the article look so much neater, as characters such as Neville, Leonard Mincing, Martin etc will never be more than a stub section. It's much better that they are merged accordingly as they only include one or two sentences. I was however pondering on the Ryan and Liz sections, but what might be better is to have the two sections merged together as a subheading under The Catherine Tate Show characters#Lauren Cooper?

On another note, your revert involved changing the tense of the Lauren Cooper section, e.g Lauren Cooper was a fiction character ..... etc. Check out Albus Dumbledore for an example. Eagle Owl (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Daniel Juslenius2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Daniel Juslenius2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kielioppi.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Kielioppi.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

welcome ... a did you know nomination

...that the first extensive dictionary in Finnish was written by Fennoman Daniel Juslenius in 1745? by Leopea nom OK? Victuallers (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 19 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Daniel Juslenius, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 08:52, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Video thumb eps01e.jpg

Thanks for uploading Video thumb eps01e.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tyy

A tag has been placed on Tyy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

{{{2}}}

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ukexpat (talk) 13:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Student Union of the University of Turku

A tag has been placed on Student Union of the University of Turku requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 13:21, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Student Union of the University of Turku

A tag has been placed on Student Union of the University of Turku requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 18:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Student Union of the University of Turku. Thank you. Please also proofread your changes, using the Preview button, before Saving, so that the edit history does not get clogged up. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 18:34, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Student Union of the University of Turku

I've restored the article after consultation with various other student union pages here on Wikipedia. Make sure to read this and this, however. Regards, Rudget 11:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. You look like you know what you're doing. Rudget 11:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help with Finland's Top Model page Suomen huippumalli haussa

Sorry Leopea. I did not see your request until more than thirteen hours after you posted it. It looks like you and User:Shameless got the page sorted out. Do you still need help? User:Akalukas has a history of vandalizing that article and other articles of similar subject matter. I can try to keep an eye on things if you want. Enviroboy^Talk_Cs 20:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Finnish GLBT celebrities

Category:Finnish GLBT celebrities, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm!

I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 10:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fork (band)

A tag has been placed on Fork (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Leopea! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Saimi Hoyer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Minna Cheung - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Student Union Choir of the University of Turku

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Student Union Choir of the University of Turku requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Udmurt grammar page and keyboard layout issue

Hi! It's very nice to see such serious Udmurt grammar page! But you (or someone else) have used very strange keyboard layout while editing it. Please take a look at Talk:Udmurt_grammar#Deep_review_needed to check out changes that I have done. I see, that Komi grammar page has the same errors. If you (or someone else that you know) are author of such keyboard, please don't use it on other Udmurt, Komi and related pages. Feel free to contact me on any Udmurt/Komi/Russian keyboard layout isses! Regards, Andrew Andrewboltachev (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying user about missing file description(s) (bot - disable)

File:Kielioppi.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Kielioppi.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 22:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bologna sausage

Hey, might be that you don't know that the place for the interwiki links is nowadays Wikidata. Bologna sausage (d:Q543025) article contains subjects about many kind of sausages, when fi:Lauantaimakkara deals only with lauantaimakkara in Finland. From lauantaimakkara article: "lauantaimakkara is not known outside of Finland". Lauantaimakkara should be linked together only with sv:Lördagskorv, because it's the same. --Stryn (talk) 20:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TicBits, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CTO and App. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joulutorttu (pastry), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pinwheel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vicki Lawrence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Doctors. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mortal Kombat X

Hi, thanks for your contributions, but sources also must be cited, even for variations, due to the false information being added to the article on a regular basis. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 20:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I threw a source on there a little while ago. I'm just glad to have any kind of legit info on the game. :') Take care. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 21:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vispipuuro

What link do I add to avoid deletion? Recipes? These desserts are shared between the mentioned countries, are identical and it would be nice to see them under one section. Thanks Polaroidthepenguin (talk) 8:06, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Mama's Family edit

I myself was confused and didn't even know Eunice the movie had a page until yesterday when I clicked that "Eunice" link to be directed to the character page but realized it was for a movie. I actually follow the Mama's Family pages closely and was surprised to learn the Eunice movie has had a page for nearly a year. I have tried to resolve the matter by putting in a clarification in italics. If you still take issue, we'll have to open up the debate on the talk page to third and fourth parties but we're not allowed to continually revert each other. And since you'd be the first to break the 3-revert rule, I am just warning you that you'd be the one in danger of being blocked. AmericanDad86 (talk) 08:22, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One would think as the creator of that article, you would want to make its existence unequivocally clear and have no problem with my clarification efforts. Your response to challenge me on my efforts to clarify has been the opposite of what one would expect given I'm only trying to make the article's existence clear.

Whatever the case, it seems we're not going to see eye to eye on the edit so I've put together a poll on the Mama's Family article talk page, as shown here Talk:Mama's Family#Poll to "keep" or "remove" film clarification. Feel free to add any side to the argument you feel I didn't cover within your vote on the matter.

Also, just an fyi, it doesn't matter how polite you are in a revert war, breaking the 3-revert rule is against Wikipedia policy and is grounds for a block. When an edit war is taking place, wikipedia policy states that users are to hash it out on the article talk page and if that doesn't work, request the opinions of other parties outside of the debate on the matter. As it seems you and I are firmly in disagreement, I have skipped to seeking the opinion of other parties. Cheers! AmericanDad86 (talk) 11:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mama's Family, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Friedman and Eric Brown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Your addition to Mrs. Wiggins has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 20:43, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Went with the Wind!

I'd like to know why my addition was removed as "unsourced." It is a very specific scene in a movie. How am I supposed to "source" it? Send a copy of the DVD? It's important to know that the joke may not have been original to the sketch. Cadavra8Cadavra8 (talk) 06:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Leopea. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Leopea. You have new messages at Talk:Carol Burnett.
Message added 00:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shearonink (talk) 00:10, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Leopea. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Leopea. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mama's Family ending

Regarding your edit here [1], this is all speculation as I can't find any proof online, but broadcasters typically won't let go of a show that's doing well in the ratings for no apparent reason. I think Vicki Lawrence was the reason the show ended, not desiring to sign on again because of the mounting resentment from the person who got her to where she is, Carol Burnett. As I'm sure you know, Carol long resented Vicki for this run with the Mama character as she was aligned with her ex-husband, Joe Hamilton. Vicki probably said after the contract is up, I'm out. Carol of course even refused to speak to her all those years during the show's successful run in syndication. Ken Berry even sounded confused as to why the show ended in one interview, going so far as stating "Vicki just tired of playing the role." Ken blamed Vicki for the show's end in one interview. I just wish Vicki would admit it but she probably doesn't want to upset Carol. JudgeJudyCourthouse25 (talk) 07:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In Vicki Lawrence's interview with the formerly known Archive of American Television (now The Interviews), https://interviews.televisionacademy.com/interviews/vicki-lawrence, she states that she wanted the series to go on, but the syndicators told the cast that they had enough episodes for syndication and that the series would end Leopea (talk) 15:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. I haven't seen that interview in several years, from my recollection, all that Vicki said was that they had enough episodes for syndication and it met it's threshold. It was kind of a vague comment the way she said it. Also, if you think about it. Mama's end was sort of incomplete. There was no formal ending. Vint and Naomi had a baby and lived in the backyard wasn't much of a closer. I wish Burnett would have celebrated Vicki's success instead of tearing her down given Burnett pretty much begged Vicki to do the show on her own. JudgeJudyCourthouse25 (talk) 16:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arto Nyberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arto Nyberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arto Nyberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MartinPict (talk) 14:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]