User talk:OsmiumGuard

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ernest Dichter have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ernest Dichter was changed by OsmiumGuard (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858076 on 2021-03-04T15:48:05+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Novakreo. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sark have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. novakreo (talk) 15:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary when proposing deletion

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary which clearly mentions the term "prod" when proposing a page for uncontroversial deletion. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{proposed deletion}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Shadow311 (talk) 19:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]