User talk:Particleshow22

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!

Welcome to Wikipedia and WikiProject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).

We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. I noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles, such as your edits to the article Abbott Laboratories; it's great to have a new editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:

Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.

Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any questions. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! — Prodraxis {talk • contributions} (she/her) 14:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for you encouragements and guidance. For years now Wikipedia has made my work easier. I figured it is time for me to contribute! I have been working offline on a bio. I might ping you for p2p feedback when I am done. Particleshow22 (talk) 23:05, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? nominations

Hiya, Prodraxis here :) (same username, new signature, eh?) You may remember me as the editor who left a welcome message on your Talk page a few months ago. I've been seeing that you've been writing more articles about medical subjects since you've joined, which is amazing - they are very much well referenced and well written. Do you wish to nominate one of the articles you created to be featured on the Did You Know section on the Main Page? Articles that were created, expanded fivefold in prose or taken to Good Article status within 7 days of nominating are eligible for getting Did You Know? credit. Articles must have at least 250 words of prose to be considered for DYK. You can use this gadget to help nominate articles, and you can refer to this as an example DYK nomination that I've done in the past. If you need help with this, feel free to reach out to me anytime. All the best, #prodraxis ^connect 18:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you @Prodraxis: for letting me know. I didn't know how to nominate so this is definitely valuable. I am a bit busy writing some valuable articles. It would be great to nominate of of my articles. I will try to do it soon when I find some spare time. Particleshow22 (talk) 11:45, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Prodraxis: Hey! Would please help me and review this book article I just finished working on? Always appreciating your constructive collaboration. Particleshow22 (talk) 16:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Particleshow22:

Done Reviewed. Do you want to nominate it for Did You Know as well in addition? #prodraxis ^connect 17:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Prodraxis:Thank you! Yes please it would great if you can nominate it as well. Particleshow22 (talk) 19:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Particleshow22

Done see here. In the future feel free to self nominate your articles though as most DYK articles are self noms. #prodraxis ^connect 21:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Prodraxis: Sure! Thank you. Particleshow22 (talk) 22:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John Oghalai

Hi! I see you are a member of WikiProject Medicine. I am seeking assistance in a matter regarding the page of Dr. John Oghalai. W12SW77 (talk) 04:00, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I'll look at it and get back to you when I got the time.Particleshow22 (talk) 18:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@W12SW77: I just linked to Oghalai from PLX and removed the Orphan template.Particleshow22 (talk) 19:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for War Against Smallpox

On 13 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article War Against Smallpox, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that War Against Smallpox describes how Edward Jenner's vaccination technique spread across Europe during the Napoleonic Wars? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/War Against Smallpox. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, War Against Smallpox), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Particleshow22. Thank you for your work on Gary Gereffi. Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 17:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Herpetogenesis: Thank you! I read Gereffi's book Global Value Chains and Development (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018) which led me to do some research about him. I was surprised there wasn't an entry about him considering his extensive work on Global value chains, and so I decided to do it. Particleshow22 (talk) 20:36, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Particleshow22. Thank you for your work on The Market Opportunity Navigator. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I wonder whether you could take a look at the last 5-or-so references on the current version. They seem completely out of place - biomedical papers from the 1970s, before the creator was (ah) active.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 18:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: Thank you for your detailed and on-point feedback. I took action: copy-edited and removed irrelevant sources. By the way, the last couple of weeks I have noticed that pages take longer to be reviewed, it is because of some sort of a huge backlog of pages waiting to be reviewed? Thank you. Particleshow22 (talk) 20:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a very large and rapidly expanding backlog on new page review; in fact, I've only just joined the team of reviewers (I usually focus on merging), in part because they need the help! You can see the backlog at the top of Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol. We're seeing lots of translation drives, plus the Women in Red initiatives; all good causes, but it does create some work. Klbrain (talk) 21:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow 13837 articles in the backlog as of the time of writing this. I am thinking about devoting more time to writing articles and I might even think about becoming a reviewer myself. One has to give back to the project! Particleshow22 (talk) 10:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Klbrain: Hi! Some new sources emerged (Bacq and Wang (2024); Sarasvathy (2024); Stevenson et al. (2024);) and I cited them and edited the article. Looking forward to your thoughts on this.Particleshow22 (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About chromosomal theory of cancer

Hello ,

I saw that you added my wikipage into medicine and biology topic , thank you for it very much , it will be great if you help me editing the page by adding all the outlinks to different terms on the page....Can you help out ? And also if you have any information you can contribute to page.

Thanks @Particleshow22 Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 14:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rathod Dharmarajsinh: Done! Thanks and happy editing! Particleshow22 (talk) 06:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much @Particleshow22 🙌🙌🤝 Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 08:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One more request,

I think the wikipage of Chromosome theory of cancer is not seen on searching may be due to it may still not verified, how to make the wikipage available to all....

Can you help ?? Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 08:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rathod Dharmarajsinh: It should be patrolled by a reviewer soon. There is currently a huge backlog which is heavy and hard work for reviewers; all you can do is wait. Particleshow22 (talk) 23:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Global Initiative of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Global Initiative of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:45, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TechnoSquirrel69: Thank you! Particleshow22 (talk) 11:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Global Initiative of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Global Initiative of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thanks for the notification. Particleshow22 (talk) 17:17, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dopesick: Dealers, Doctors, and the Drug Company that Addicted America

Hello, Particleshow22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dopesick: Dealers, Doctors, and the Drug Company that Addicted America, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. Particleshow22 (talk) 13:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Killer Looks: The Forgotten History of Plastic Surgery in Prisons

Hello, Particleshow22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Killer Looks: The Forgotten History of Plastic Surgery in Prisons, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reminder. Particleshow22 (talk) 13:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Larry Purcell

Hello, Particleshow22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Larry Purcell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Market Opportunity Navigator

Hello, Particleshow22,

Thank you for creating The Market Opportunity Navigator.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I struggle to find and real WP:SIGCOV on this topic as a notable subject by a high quality national WP:RS. The only ones are by Marc Gruber himself, which don't help WP:GNG? thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 11:33, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aszx5000: Thank you for taking the time to go through the article, I really appreciate it! I am committed to keep working on the article and I am keeping an eye on emerging review literature and sources to keep expanding and improving the page. I will ping you in any major future edit. Happy editing! Particleshow22 (talk) 16:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. Gruber (who's article I also cleaned up) is definitely becoming a major figure in this field (which I am familiar with), so perhaps it will attract more independent research. Also, is "The" part of the name or is it "Market Opportunity Navigator" - I found examples of both when searching? thanks and great work. Aszx5000 (talk) 16:51, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe both "Market Opportunity Navigator" or "The Market Opportunity Navigator" are valid, a redirect can be done to avoid confusion. Thank you for your kind comment and consideration of my work. Will keep improving the article when I get some free time.Particleshow22 (talk) 13:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aszx5000: Hi! Some new sources emerged (Bacq and Wang (2024); Sarasvathy (2024); Stevenson et al. (2024)) and I cited them and edited the article. Looking forward to your thoughts on this. Particleshow22 (talk) 08:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Gilbert Hegemier 1971.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gilbert Hegemier 1971.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:29, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Thank you for notifying me! I already removed the image from the article's Infobox. Will try to find a freely licensed alternative in the future.Particleshow22 (talk) 13:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

International Journal of Solids Structures moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to International Journal of Solids Structures. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Azarctic (talk) 11:11, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thank you.Particleshow22 (talk) 22:23, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gilbert Hegemier 1971.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gilbert Hegemier 1971.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bibliography of Gilbert Hegemier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bibliography of Gilbert Hegemier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibliography of Gilbert Hegemier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 07:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ldm1954: Thank you for notifying me. I took a look at the deletion discussion and I know understand why you nominated it for deletion. I agree and I believe a selected publications/selected works in his main article is what I should had gone with in the first place. Particleshow22 (talk) 20:10, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Initiative of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:NORG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Global Initiative of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SafariScribe: Thank you! I will keep a copy of the draft in case it will qualify in the future. Particleshow22 (talk) 17:44, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Particleshow22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bruce Baguley

Hello, Particleshow22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruce Baguley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Furst

Hello, Particleshow22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Furst, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]