User talk:Peyre

Image copyright problem with Image:BARIS_Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BARIS_Cover.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 06:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

tagged with {{gamecover}}. --bluemask 08:07, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Broadband

Please see Talk:Broadband Internet access#.22Not really broadband.22. – Smyth\^talk 16:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:VoskhodCapsule.gif. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:VoskhodCapsule.gif and also as Image:Voskhod.gif. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 21:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mprince-c.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mprince-c.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Machiavelli: The Prince

Hello, I see you've done a very good job on creating and maintaining Machiavelli: The Prince. However, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a game review/guide. Your article isn't written in an encyclopedic tone. Please improve it accordingly. You can see more about the style you should use at Wikipedia:Manual of Style. By the way, keep up the good work! - DTRY 18:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

P.S. I'm a fan of the game too, although I never won it (can't keep my lead in the long run.)

Army of Darkness

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to , makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiggerjay 20:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:FaceInTree.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FaceInTree.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sebesta (talk • contribs) 00:26, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

Fair use disputed for Image:Soyuz.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Soyuz.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:VoskhodCapsule.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:VoskhodCapsule.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Venice MerchantPrince1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Venice MerchantPrince1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Venice MerchantPrince2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Venice MerchantPrince2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Venice Machiavelli.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Venice Machiavelli.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Pascal.Tesson 16:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Apollo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Apollo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BoxCoverM2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BoxCoverM2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lapot.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lapot.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:JupiterCapsule.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:JupiterCapsule.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KvartetCapsule.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:KvartetCapsule.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GeminiCapsule.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:GeminiCapsule.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BARIS Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BARIS Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BlackstronautsSmall.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:BlackstronautsSmall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:51, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Blackstronauts.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Blackstronauts.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:54, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

your edit to Alexey_Leonov

Hi, why did you add this detail? It's true (per Voskhod 2), but I don't understand how it clarifies Leonov's reentry problems. --Jtir (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

[Copied from User talk:Jtir to maintain context.] --Jtir (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Why did I add that Leonov's airlock was inflatable? I was trying to emphasize that the troubles he had getting back into the capsule were likely due to a questionable design. My addition may have been somewhat questionable; I wouldn't be offended if you think the article is better off without it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peyre (talk • contribs) 18:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

OK. Voskhod 2 goes into fascinating detail on this event. The major problem was that "Leonov’s Berkut suit ballooned". Maybe the airlock contributed, but the article, which is sourced, doesn't say so. --Jtir (talk) 21:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

"an inflatable airlock just plain sounds dangerous."

Yes, rather like an air mattress.  :-)

From Voskhod 2 it sounds like the design was complex, with redundancy.

I also misremembered -- Leonov went in head-first and then got stuck trying to turn around to close the outside hatch. Fortunately, he didn't need to use his suicide pill. --Jtir (talk) 22:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Buzz_Aldrin's_Race_into_Space

Hello there, I notice that you say that you have written permission from the publishers to use the images in this article. A couple of issues;

• Have you ensured that the copyright holder has given permission to release these under a free licence (either public domain, cc-by, cc-by-sa, or, preferably, GFDL.
• Have you sent confirmation of those permissions to permissions-en@wikimedia.org

Both of these are required to enable use of the images in the article. Thanks, BKNFCC 22:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

• • Great, thankyou! Black Kite 17:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BoxCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BoxCover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• Image:DenIniquity.jpg
• Image:BoxCoverM1.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ApolloCapsule.gif}

Thank you for uploading Image:ApolloCapsule.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BARIS Baikonour.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BARIS Baikonour.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BARIS CDNewscast.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BARIS CDNewscast.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BARIS Cape.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BARIS Cape.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BARIS Cover.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:BARIS Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BARIS LaunchPad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BARIS LaunchPad.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BARIS MissionPlanning.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BARIS MissionPlanning.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BARIS Recruitment.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BARIS Recruitment.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BadRocket!.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:BadRocket!.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HardwareUSSR.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:HardwareUSSR.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HardwareUS.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:HardwareUS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:XMS-2.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:XMS-2.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: BARIS

Hello, Peyre. You have new messages at Mendaliv's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey again!

Hiya Peyre, I noticed you're getting involved in the BARIS article again. I hope you like how it's turned out thus far- if the responses from other people in the video games wikiproject are any indication, it ought to be rated B-class soon. The main place it seems to be lacking though is in the reception section, and I was wondering if you had any more publications that indicate what the critical reception of the game was? Or really any more publications at all... while the BARIS companion turned out to be a life saver, we really need most of the stuff we say to appear in reliable, third-party sources.

Also, where did you find out that the XMS-2 image is based off the Northrop M2-F2? Honestly it looks a bit more like the Northrop M2-F3 to me. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 17:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad you called me on the M2-F2 comment. It looks like you're right; the M2-F3 has that third fin, which the M2-F2 lacked. I'll update the BARIS entry accordingly. My source on it was an email from Erik Anderson, answering some questions I had about the XMS-2 back in March 2005. He wrote: "He [Fritz] didn't want to call it HL-10 or M2-F2, though in fact we used shots of those lifting bodies." It looks like they used the M2-F3 instead of, or in addition to, the M2-F2. Certainly they used the -F3 for the pictures in the administration screens. Looks like I need to update the alt on my XMS-2 image on The Docking Module, too.

My source indicating the game's critical reception would be the reviews I found on the game, which are linked to from the Links--Reviews box in The Docking Module. I wish I had more for you on that, but those were my main source.Peyre (talk) 21:55, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Speaking of which, those links on The Docking Module have been of immense value in building the article to the point it is at now. We'd be dead in the water without the info from the BARIS Companion to fuel the development section. I'm thinking with the info I plan on digging out of Computer Gaming World (once I make the pilgrimage to my alma mater), it'll be fleshed out a lot better. Same library might have more gaming mags of the era, which might help out, especially with critical reception. Anyhow, things are looking good so far. I suspect we aren't far from a B-class article or maybe better, just gotta fill in those gaps. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 06:10, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Good, I'm glad they were helpful to you. I'm glad to see the progress you're making on the article--that's great that you're putting all this time and effort into the article. BTW, do you have a paper or electronic copy of the Companion?

I was able to dig up an electronic copy of the Companion. Also, wasn't there a 100-some page "historical manual"? I was able to find the regular manual that came with my CD-ROM edition, but I haven't seen anything more substantial. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:59, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm not aware of another publication besides the game manual and the Companion. I'm guessing that the "historical manual" you've heard of must be the Companion itself, since over half of it is historical background. But if there is another BARIS manual out there, I'd be very interested in reading it.

Empire of Brazil

Hi! I´ve seen that you corrected quite a few mistakes in the Empire of Brazil article. Could you also take a look in the sections "From Kingdom to Empire", "Imperial Constitution" and "Confederation of Equator" in the article History of the Brazilian Empire? Thank you very much, - --Lecen (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I am the guy who wrote the text... heh heh... I had a lot of work reading so many books to make the text in portuguese. But I thought that the english Wikipedia could also enjoy more information regarding the matter. The problem is exactly that: I needed someone who could correct all grammar mistakes. But thanks a lot, you´re helping a lot! - --Lecen (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you once more for your help! I am a little bit tired of writing the texts about the Brazilian Empire, but I believe I´ll try to make something about the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary branch, but not now. Although I must confess that the text about the the history of the Empire it is still full of historical mistakes. Well, I believe that we shall fix it with time. Again, thanks a lot! - --Lecen (talk) 00:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi mate

I would like to ask you if you would like to look and give your opinion on the new Articles for deletion proposal for FreeOrion. I wrote a new version article and I would like to ask you if you could vote on it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeOrion and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/FreeOrion_(3rd_nomination) . Thank you! Peer-LAN (talk) 13:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Super Star Trek

An article that you have been involved in editing, Super Star Trek, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Star Trek. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Alastairward (talk) 21:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to List of Red Dwarf characters. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. magnius (talk) 16:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to List of Red Dwarf characters, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. magnius (talk) 17:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

The warning is valid as you chose to re-add the information despite one warning. Edits such as this need to be fully sourced and not contain your own interperation of the reason behind such change. If you can find a reliable source then please feel free to add it. magnius (talk) 17:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:The front of the butcher shop.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:The front of the butcher shop.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 04:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Church of Aubin.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Church of Aubin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 06:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Making Jambon de Bayonne--Step 4.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Making Jambon de Bayonne--Step 4.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 06:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mars Rafikov

A tag has been placed on Mars Rafikov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shashwat986 (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

The page has been restored, however it really needs additional citations. Thanks, — Kralizec! (talk) 19:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

"Church is singular, not plural"

This is true, but you may be interested to learn that both "the Church are" and "the Church is" are considered correct in British English. It depends mainly on whether the noun is envisaged as representing a single entity or a group of individuals. Of course, this is consierably less common in US English, so your edit was justified given the context. But I thought, on the off-chance that you didn't know already, that you might be interested (there's more here). garik (talk) 17:18, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 16:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your offer to look at the articles for grammar, etc.Vyeh (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

December 2011

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to David Fasold, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 07:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to David Fasold. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 07:25, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Most of the edits I make are minor ones, so I think I've gotten in the habit of checking the box and may be occasionally forgetting to not do that when I make a more substantial edit--I need to start paying closer attention to that. I also wasn't sure just where the line was drawn between a minor edit and a non-minor one; I'll try to bear that in mind in the future. As to the content I added to David Fasold, it seemed an appropriate observation; deathbed conversions of non-Christians have been claimed by Christians in the past, and this seemed very reminiscent of those. Perhaps I'll add it back if I can find some solid references to this sort of thing happening. Peyre (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Merchant Prince

The article Merchant Prince has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per Holistic Design's AfD, notability was not established in the company's listed games. There is useful information here—that is not the issue, but notability is not established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar · · 18:50, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Merchant Prince for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Merchant Prince is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merchant Prince until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. czar · · 02:22, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Milladoiro 3

The article Milladoiro 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources/no tracks

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jojo966 (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Milladoiro 3 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milladoiro 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milladoiro 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

You seem to be missing the point in the AFD. An album must be notable to have its own article. An article that simply lists tracks is not notable, especially if none of the tracks are notable in their own right (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

The article on Milladoiro included links for its albums, most of which articles hadn't been created. Since I have those albums, I thought I could at least contribute what information was available on them (including the cover art), rather than leaving them out there as links with no destination. Peyre (talk) 00:01, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Well, it seems that someone else out there decided most of the articles I wrote for Milladoiro's early albums merited deletion without even a discussion, and went ahead with same (leading to the orphaning and automatic deletion of the cover art), and the links to those albums now redirect to the main Milladoiro page. I guess it sort of doesn't matter now what's done with this album; feel free to delete it if you feel it's shaky. Peyre (talk) 05:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

The requirements under WP:NALBUM are the key thing for you: individual albums typically do not deserve an article of their own. It's ok to list them on the artist talkpage. Don't be discouraged. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 21:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

"We're deleting all the articles you just wrote because they were unimportant, and your uploaded photos associated with those articles will soon follow." Why be discouraged? Peyre (talk) 22:53, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

On second thought, I see the editors kept the page I put the most work into; perhaps I was being too harsh there. Peyre (talk) 22:52, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cover of the album "A Galicia de Maeloc".jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of the album "A Galicia de Maeloc".jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Well it wasn't me who orphaned it. It was attached to an article I wrote earlier this afternoon, which seems to have been summarily deleted without warning. Peyre (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:SolfafriaCover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:SolfafriaCover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Well it wasn't me who orphaned it. It was attached to an article I wrote earlier this afternoon, which seems to have been summarily deleted without warning. Peyre (talk) 05:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CastellumHonesti.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CastellumHonesti.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Well it wasn't me who orphaned it. It was attached to an article I wrote earlier this afternoon, which seems to have been summarily deleted without warning. Peyre (talk) 05:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:GaliciaNoTempo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GaliciaNoTempo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Well it wasn't me who orphaned it. It was attached to an article I wrote earlier this afternoon, which seems to have been summarily deleted without warning. Peyre (talk) 05:23, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Milladoiro 3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Celtic

O Berro Seco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Celtic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

re Meteorites thank you

That has been driving me nuts, although not nuts enough to create an account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.170.233 (talk) 20:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!--though I'm not sure which page this refers to offhand... Peyre (talk) 13:38, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

BARIS

Hi Peyre, recently you moved BARIS to the List of open-source video games and I moved it to list of ex-commercial games as also the content seems under a non-commercial freeware license, according to a copyright information on your former geocity fansite. Copyright.txt Has something changed on the license situation since then for the content? tanks Shaddim (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

That could be a simple error on my part, though I thought that BARIS (or RIS, the port of BARIS) counted since the owners have opened the game, and the source is freely downloadable from RIS's SourceForge page (http://sourceforge.net/projects/raceintospace/). Peyre (talk) 13:38, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dead Man's Chest, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ben Gunn and Jim Hawkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Oops! I should've checked those links. Thanks for letting me know. Peyre (talk) 01:06, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Concerted effort to push the BARIS article even farther

Hi Peyre, long time no talk. Not sure how active you are around here, but I've started to get interested in improving the BARIS article again. I was wondering, since you're fairly well versed with what's out there about the game, if you had any leads on publications talking about the game or developers, especially ones that might not have been digitized, or might not be readily accessible? Like how the CGW articles were next to impossible to find. I really think we're not far from getting the article to the point where we can get it rated a B-class, or even up to Good Article status... or even farther. As sparse as info seems to be out there, the stuff I am finding makes it sound like the game was actually quite beloved and well-remembered, even if it didn't make as big a splash as some of the other titles Interplay published in the same general period.

Anyway, just thought I'd ping you here. I'm not in any kind of rush (exams for the next few days and then busy for the holidays), but I'm thinking if anyone can help with this, it'd be you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey, good to hear from you! I don't know of much else, unfortunately. When I put together the Docking Module, I scoured the Internet and included on it everything I could find pertaining to BARIS. If I think of anything I'll let you know. Peyre (talk) 22:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Well I'd appreciate anything you think of, man. Even if you just have leads on stuff that you haven't been able to access. I'm back in school for another year and a half, so I've got free access to some pretty sweet databases, and can probably get interlibrary loans on print sources. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Barrington Hall Article /Image

Hi Peyre. I see you uploaded an image for the Barrington Hall (Berkeley, California) article. A group of concerned former Barrington residents is hoping to collect, save and protect all such images and related artist's rights. Were you ever resident there under another name? Did you take other images? We'd love to have you involved. Hilarleo ^Hey,L.E.O. 19:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh hi! I was going to live in Barrington my senior year (1989-90), but ended up staying in I-House instead. So I was never a Barrington resident. I'm glad I snapped that picture though! Feel free to use it.Peyre (talk) 20:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh--to answer your other question, I didn't take any other pictures, just that one.Peyre (talk) 22:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Starship Troopers (film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Peyre. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to FreeCol, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't revert for no apparent reason. See WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:VG/MOS. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 00:22, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Africa in WWI

Greetings Peyre, I changed most of your edits back because the articles were in BritEng in which usage of us, hyphens and zeds is different to AmEng. I thought your punctuation changes were pretty good so I put them back afterwards. Happy to discuss, Regards Keith-264 (talk) 07:44, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up Keith, and I appreciate you letting my punctuation changes stand. That was the important part in the first place—I didn't make other changes to a section unless I found grammatical issues in it. Peyre (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Peyre. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, I'm Anita5192. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Caffeine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. — Anita5192 (talk) 16:50, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Ok, fair enough. I thought it was a fun bit of snark, but maybe I missed the mark on that. Thanks for keeping my change of "reduce" to "reduced". Peyre (talk) 17:09, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Peyre. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Landovian Insignia.png

The file File:Landovian Insignia.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Radagast - War In Middle Earth.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Radagast - War In Middle Earth.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 08:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

When copy-editing, you can also look for templates like {{EngvarB}} at the top of the page's source, which tell you what variety to use. – Joe (talk) 08:58, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)