User talk:Quercusrobur
 | This user has left Wikipedia. Quercusrobur has not edited Wikipedia since August 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Sex Pistols
[edit]Hey Quercusrobur, I reverted your renaming of that Pistol's section, sorry about that, but the article is undergoing a WP:FAR and needs to be 'just so', ie WP:MOS etc. They WERE hit singles, but that needs to be a narrative statement, rather one in the heading. I noticed you have made good contributions to this article before, could do with a hand in avoiding the article becoming a WP:FAR victim. :( , anyway, (Coil00 20:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC))
- Oh christ, just relised you deleted 'Hit' rather than added! (was using 'pop ups', sometimes a bit confusing). I'll delete that word again later. It'd be great if you could add a few refs, but more than anything the language needs to be toned down a bit. Anyway, always good to hear from another old punk, take care Coil00 07:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Kronstadt Uprising
[edit]I don't know if you ever met them or not, but it wouldn't suprise me. Anywho, I just got one of their CDs and there are not lyrics in the book, and I swear not a single place online has any of their lyrics (not even their official website). Their website doesn't have any contact info either, otherwise I'd email them. Do you know of how I can find the lyrics and/or how I can get in contact with them? Thanks. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 06:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Awesome! Thanks a lot. The website looks pretty cool, haven't checked out the message boards yet. I just had my birthday so I splurged at Amoeba Records in San Francisco. It was my first time there and was almost like a religious experience. I felt bad spending so much money on CDs, but they had so much cool obscure stuff I've never seen in any record stores. That's where I found the CD. The best one I got was probably the Oi Polloi album I'm listening to right now. Well, have a good time this weekend, that sounds pretty cool. And if I ever find anything by either of your bands I'll be sure to snap it up if I'm not broke, but something tells me I'll have trouble finding any of your stuff here in the states. Damn anarchist bands doing indy labels and self-releases ;) Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 06:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Anarcho-punk and sXe
[edit]Hi, would you mind taking a look at the section titled "Input needed at Anarcho-punk and Straight edge" at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Punk music. Thanks. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 02:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Punk rock
[edit]Hi Graham, I notice two pictures taken by you are currently featured on Punk rock. The article is currently up for FAR, one of the issues I'm trying to get around is the number of fair use images being used. Was wondering if there are anymore free images in the Quercusrobur vaults, in paticular one that could be used for the Oi! section. Thanks. + Ceoil 23:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Survey Invitation
[edit]Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 03:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me
Help Resolving a conflict
[edit]I have read the pages about this on wikipedia and I have came to you because you seem to be a person who knows how wikipedia is supposed to work and are most likely 100% neutral on this matter. I am involved in a rather intense edit war with two other editors of the article Miriam Rivera. In the last days the user User:Jokestress has quite reasonably asked for the article to be backed up with more reliable sources. Well I found them and that seems to have placated her. She has acted in 100% reasonable way in all of this. The problem arises in that she has asked in the spirt of resolving the conflict we were having other people who are not 100% neutral it seems to comment on the matter. These being the user User:Longhair and the userUser:Alison in particular who have not bothered to justify anything that they have done. Longhiar being an admin seems to feel no need to discuss anything and I feel is abusing her powers. Is there anything you can do? --Hfarmer 04:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Request for peer review
[edit]Hi, I put an article up for peer review, Date cultivation in Dar al-Manasir, and found your name in the horticulture wikiproject list of people. If you have some time, I think it would make a great FA and wanted to get some expert advice. cc: user:SB_Johnny, user:NoahElhardt, Cas Liber, User:Doc Tropics, Lynnathon, Benjamin, HelloMojo, Strobilus. Thanks, Rhetth 01:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Jesus fuckin wept!!!
[edit]Does anybody else remember when contributing to wikipedia used to be FUN????? I don't even understand half of the gobbledegook above and certainly don't have the energy or time to start to undertake the labyrinthine process of meeting whatever obscure criteria is being demanded above, even though I know that all of the images uploaded were done in good faith according to the guidelines specified at the time, and all the images illustrate relevant points in the articles in question, but if the wikip[edia project will be enhanced rather than diminished by their deletion, do what you have to do. i think I'm out of here. quercus robur 00:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you still read this, Quercus, let me assure you I have always appreciated your input, it's always been of been of the highest quality. I am sorry to see you go. Dieter Simon 23:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)Dieter Simon 23:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Horticulture and Gardening Collaboration of the Month
[edit]| The WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening collaborations are: |
|
| To propose future collaborations, please contribute here! |
Wassupwestcoast 05:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
User quercusrobur hasn't been with us for years
[edit]Don't any of you people ever try to find quercusrobur's input? He hasn't been with us for over three years now. Why are you wasting your time? He made it pretty clear that when he last contributed that he was no longer interested. Dieter Simon (talk) 22:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Worth a try
[edit]I suspect you do log in every now and again, mostly as an IP probably, but still... I want you back, man. Yintaɳ 22:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Canadian hardcore punk
[edit]I've started an article on Canadian hardcore punk if you're interested in helping. ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Attribution
[edit]I am using your File:Forgard2-003.gif in the upcoming edition of Inter ni dirite (link is not live at the time of writing). Thanks! I've asked the proper attribution to be made, hopefully it works out.
I have translated it to Esperanto; I'll upload the translated version to Commons as soon as I figure out how to do so in a sensible way.
—Leif Arne Storset 22:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of List of musicians in the first wave of punk rock for deletion
[edit]
The article List of musicians in the first wave of punk rock is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of musicians in the first wave of punk rock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of List of musicians in the first wave of punk rock for deletion
[edit]The article List of musicians in the first wave of punk rock is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of musicians in the first wave of punk rock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 18:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of High fibre composting for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High fibre composting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High fibre composting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 10:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
[edit]| The current WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening Collaborations are: Hobby farm |
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
[edit]| The current monthly WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening collaborations are: |
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
[edit]| The current monthly WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening collaborations are: To propose future collaborations, please contribute here! |
—Northamerica1000(talk) 00:34, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
[edit]WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening collaborations are:
To propose future collaborations, please contribute here! |
From: Northamerica1000(talk) 02:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Notice of change
[edit]Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
(delivered by mabdul 23:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC))
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Crass formed in 1976. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Dick Robinson (talk • contribs) 16:38, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Autumn Poison has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) No meaningful hits in searches of Google, Google Books, EBSCOhost. There are no worthwhile redirect targets.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 17:22, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Musics (magazine) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Musics (magazine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musics (magazine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 18:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
Grey Baskerville has left the building
[edit]After surviving AfDs, Doug Thorley and Magoo are still up, but both could use better sourcing. I'm wondering if you've got back issues of Hot Rod, Car Craft, National Dragster, & the like that would help. Ditto on Jake, Showboat, The Mantaray, Ed Donovan, Donovan hemi, Silhouette, and a few others I've created lately. (Have a look at my userpage under the "Open Vanity" 3&4.) Any help you can be would be very much appreciated. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 06:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
The article Judge Death has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fictional character. No evidence of stand-alone notability. Not a shred of analysis. Pure WP:PLOT and list of appearances in media. Fails GNG/NFICTION.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Gazeintofist.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Gazeintofist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Judge Death for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judge Death is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judge Death until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Permanent Publications has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails the GNG and WP:CORP. No reliable sources discussing the subject (as opposed to founders, or its publications) in substantive detail added in over a decade.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravenswing 11:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Movement for Compassionate Living for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Movement for Compassionate Living until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Vaticidalprophet 04:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of The Screamin' Ab Dabs for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Screamin' Ab Dabs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Launchballer 13:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of DIRT (band) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DIRT (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
JFHJr (㊟) 23:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Disease resistance in fruit and vegetables for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disease resistance in fruit and vegetables until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Chidgk1 (talk) 18:22, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Red Square (band)
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Red Square (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://jonseagroatt.com/projects/red-square/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mach61 (talk) 22:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Red Square (band) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Square (band) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.