Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Jump to content

User talk:ShelbyMarion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Forgive me departing a little from the Wiki guidelines - but when I see the names 'Shelby' and 'Marion' together, I think of two towns on a road leading Northwest from Gaston, North Carolina, and just wondered if you came from this exceptionally scenic part of the old South. Valetude (talk) 23:15, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Valetude. That's a good guess, but "Shelby" references a county in Tennessee where I was born (so you are half right about a Southern origin.) "Marion" references another county in a northern state where I spent much of my life. (Sorry for the delay answering this. I'm not a frequent user....and not even sure I'm doing this right where you will see this response!) ShelbyMarion (talk) 13:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shelby, Would you mind re-checking Page Nic Hard and see if the addition of discographies from Allmusic.com and Discogs.com are helpful information to aid in the keeping of this page? thnx — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.162.193.13 (talk) 02:29, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ShelbyMarion, Thank you so much for your feedback on my Brandon Jenkins entry. Would you be so kind to see if you can change your "delete" vote to a "keep" vote now? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brandon_Jenkins_(singer/songwriter) It would make me very happy. Sacha Kay 18:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just read your User page and I totally agree on you with the "non notable artists" on Wikipedia. Please, be so kind to have a look at the Brandon Jenkins wiki page (up for deletion) again. I assure you that Brandon Jenkins is a full time artist. And very well-known (heck, I'm from France, and I even know him!). Yes. He's a Red Dirt / Texas country artist. Not a genre that often makes it to the national charts. So you might have never heard of him. But he has almost 17,000 FB followers, 6,500 listeners on Last.fm and almost 600,000 plays on Spotify of only his top 10 songs. And he's been on the Texas Music Chart a lot of times (not easy to verify how many times, sorry!). Like you can see here (a random chart click) https://web.archive.org/web/20080110121246/http://www.texasmusicchart.com/Pages/Chart.htm He's had 21,080 radio spins of his (rather unknown song) Call of the Road. Yes, I'm a new editor (and really NOT liking it so far). And don't know anything about rules and regulations. So if this what I'm typing here to you is illegal and such too, please, don't hesitate to tell me. I'm willing to learn and most happy to delete it again. (Sacha Kay (talk) 16:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Shelby! I was also born in Shelby County... Bartlett to be exact. Small world! Anywho, can you please review my note on Louis Bell page? I found a recent, notable reference for the music producer who was featured in Variety's 2017 Hitmakers list. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by AEAA (talkcontribs) 23:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Re: the contractor with Wiki-music article

[edit]

From The Naked Gun Jane: How could you do something so vicious? Vincent Ludwig: It was easy my dear. You forget, I spent two years as a building contractor

Full disclosure: I was a small drywall contractor (very small) for 30 years. My attitude and demeanor drives away manipulative scumbags. Regards Tapered (talk) 06:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yung Simmie was one of the most intelligent and well written I've ever read in an AfD discussion. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Magnolia677 (talk). I can sometimes be a bit verbose in my arguments, but I indeed do much deeper research than most before weighing in a discussion. Many other AfD editors, I think, simply do a cursory application of broad wikipedia policy without bothering to actually click on links and analysis the context of sources/coverage. Way too many non-notables like this musician have been conferred encyclopedic importance, which drags down the integrity of wikipedia as a reliable source, IMO. ShelbyMarion (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Let It Out (Let It All Hang Out), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Daddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Clowes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Craig Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Micucci article edit

[edit]

I appreciate the photos link. However, the single public IG entry from an actor/comedian really isn't enough. As they are both well-known entertainers it seems odd that there has been no independent mention of this anywhere. As soon as there is some verifiable third-party discussion of the marriage it can (and should) be added to both of their articles. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 12:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Braeden Wright AfD discussion comment

[edit]

Hi ShelbyMarion! I just left you a reply to your comment on Braeden Wright's AfD that I hope you can take a moment to read :) I appreciate you dropping in to weigh your thoughts in such a nuanced and thoughtful manner and I hope the information I have provided will address all of your concerns raised so that you can proceed to weigh your vote as you see fit. I also hope you find the read in the New York Times interesting and enjoyable. Best regards and Much love x Soulman1125 (talk) 06:52, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, ShelbyMarion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Bazz (and Mike Eldred)

[edit]

After reading your page and your reason for being a reviewer, I appreciate your thoughts on the John Bazz entry that much more. Rory1262 (talk) 00:56, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should your time permit, you may also be interested in taking a look at the new page I created yesterday for guitarist Mike Eldred). Rory1262 (talk) 10:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the input. We'll see what comes of it. I'd like to see the "mosaic theory" gain more acceptance in establishing notability. Rory1262 (talk) 12:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm really intrigued...

[edit]

Care to share the name of your friend's band? Caro7200 (talk) 19:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]