User talk:Stumps

Welcome!

Hello, Stumps, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Adam^Rock 20:51, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

Response from PAUSTIN

Hi, thanks for contacting me - glad to get a response, honest. I appreciate you changing the citations,I accidentally clobbered your nice changes but I think I restored them.

Glad to hear from you.

I am not very familiar with how to communicate in wikipedia, so if I am doing something wrong, you have hints, or want to contact me at paustin@us.ibm.com, please do any of these things. unsigned (was User:Paustin)

Junstin Clemens

"Seems like a vanity page ... notability is not clearly established. Same user added a reference to Clemens' book in the article Sonnet and some misspelt nonsense on the page of the genuinely notable John Forbes, which amounted to vandalism (which is how I ended up here) and is clearly not a good sign in terms of the article under discussion here." Inconsistant, these are porbaly UK/US centred wikipedians. There was already an article on John Forbes and Justin Clemens is no less notable.Myrtone (the strict Australian wikipedian):-(

"Anyhow, I'm not the right person to engage in that particlar discussion, as I am biased: I was a friend of John's from the early 90's up to his death." Maybe you have already found the right person bacause my father has known Justin Clemens from Melbourne Universiy. And especially given that you admitted your biasm, I will maintian that you are inconsistant as I have critisised the policy as favour UK/US biographies over Australian ones (Wikipedia started in America and so did its policies)Myrtone (the strict Australian wikipedian):-o

"I see an anon user (with an IP in Virginia USA) removed the Justin Clemens sentence from the article" Well their IP is in the US their their policys on notabiliy maybe UK/US centred, a real worry. It seems that the wikipedians going against references to Justin Clemens are all non-Australin wikipedians and I cannot guarantee that their policies are not UK/US centredMyrtone (the strict Australian wikipedian):-o

Scriabin

Hi. I'm the user who added the derogatory comment about Scriabin's comparison with Stravinsky and Schoenberg. I now have a user name: Atavi. I only just saw that you reverted the changes I had made and your rationale, since not having an account I couldn't watch pages.

All in all, I agree that the comment is unnecessary, but only to who are familiar with all three composers. I suppose POV means "point of view". I disagree that it is a point of view. I understand that Schoenberg is widely recognised as one of the most important composers of the 20th century and Stravinsky is also quite important, if only for his Rite of Spring. On the other hand I dare say that Scriabin is a minor composer. What I think is that I am pointing out a 20th century analogue of a Baroque, Alessandro Scarlatti (or even J.S. Bach as far as Schoenberg goes) versus Tommaso Redi (I hope I am not doing an injustice to Redi by comparing him to Scriabin) distinction. This might be useful for those who are not familiar with the work of all composers involved.

Hugh Selwyn Mauberley

Thanks for fixing up the work I did on the page. I tried to clean it up at least a little because I think it's a great poem and deserved a better treatment than it already had, but I was in a rush and obviously made some mistakes. I plan on adding more information about the poem when I get the chance, though. Think that's justifiable?

Articles started

Hi! I came across the article 762 in poetry and saw that you created it. It wasn't on your "articles created" list, so I thought you might like to add it. jj137^Talk 2:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of HOOPLA! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HOOPLA! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HOOPLA! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:46, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Krazy Maze for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krazy Maze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krazy Maze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mika1h (talk) 10:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)