User talk:Television fan

A kitten for you!

Despite the obvious impediments in your path, you continue to work productively, attempting to collaborate in a civil manner with other editors at Pan Am (TV series) and List of Pan Am episodes. Hopefully this kitten will put a smile on your face.

AussieLegend (talk) 10:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AussieLegend, your short note is very much appreciated.Television fan (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pan Am episodes

The lead section is supposed to summarise an article, and listing the number of episodes that have aired as of a certain date is part of that summarising. Removal of "As of February 19, 2012^[update], fourteen episodes have aired, and the first season has finished airing" is inappropriate as it means the lede does not properly summarise an article. --AussieLegend (talk) 18:10, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Johnson

Read my most recent edit summary on it but check this out: Sean Bennett is a classified as a good article he was cut August 22 during the preseason and it says "Offseason and/or practice roster member only" should say squad based on the consensus but the point remains.--Rockchalk717 19:29, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gliding Over All, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Bowen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

It is you who are edit warring without obtaining consensus on the talk page. I urge you to revert yourself [[1]] . -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:37, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The South Butt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LLC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gus Fring

Hey, saw you tried adding the citations I listed. The editor is now referring to you and I as terrorists, and because you added stuff which supported my claim, he will probably try to prove you are a sockpuppet. He may come after you, Figured I'd give you a heads up. If he keeps being uncivil we may have to report him.

Mission Impossible edits

Hello,

On the Mission Impossible episode list page, you recently undid a change I made (and in turn my change had been an undo of a previous change). I wanted to ask about this.

The reason I originally changed that page was because the formerly included/inline episode summaries had been removed. At the time, I didn't realize that they'd been moved to different pages (one page per season), and on the basis that I thought they were simply lost, I undid the change. I now see that the episode summaries are accessible through separate links, so I realize the change isn't wantonly (or unknowingly) destructive, but I don't see the value proposition.

Before the change, the procedure for finding an episode summary with (for example) "kitten" in it was this:

open the page that is labeled as an episode list for the show
use the browser's search function to find the word "kitten"

After the change, the procedure is this:

open the page that is labeled as an episode list for the show
use the browser's search function to find the word "kitten"
not finding the word, possibly just assume no episodes have the word, and give up
somehow deduce that the summaries are on separate pages
for every page for the various seasons of the show, find the link, load it, and search the resulting page

Can you help me understand what the proposed value of the change is, and whether you believe said value outweighs the inconvenience introduced?

Thanks... Xray215 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xray215 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(add/edit) I wanted to say thanks for your response on my talk page... it makes me feel significantly better about the changes. -Xray215 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.30.223.94 (talk) 18:39, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Felina (Breaking Bad), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Editors cannot edit other editors' talk-page posts. Do that again and I'm contacting an admn. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Johnson

It does not matter if he's never played. Across all sports player's pages when a player signs with a team, but has yet to play a game with team, it still says "....who currently plays for the _____________". He's going to start working out with team, practicing with them, etc. therefore he does currently play for the team. Leave as currently plays for.--Rockchalk717 22:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Brandi Brandt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''[[Married... with Children]]'' as Herself (1 episode entitled ''Desperately Seeking Miss October'' (1989)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Mlpearc (open channel) 00:18, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Should TV show episode articles link to other episodes using information?

Hey, your last edit to the Better Call Saul episode got me thinking how we should link to episodes within the plot section... It'd be great if you could take a look at this RfC! Rayukk (talk) 19:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, most definitely. It provides the reader information where the incident previously occurred. Generally, the link will provide more of the story and background of the story. I find it very helpful to refresh the reader's recollection of the incident that occurred in a prior episode. A good example is the link " an earlier conversation" found in Gliding Over All which references back to a previous episode Bullet Points (Breaking Bad). Television fan (talk) 21:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Republican Debates

I do not wish to partake in the edit war which you are beginning to start. However, it can be inferred from the source that it was in fact the msot-watched in history. Furthermore, I can provide a source to establish this if logical inference is insufficient to please you. It is necessary to mention this fact, not only for its historical significance, but its mention clarifies to the reader that it is the most-viewed cable telecast in history of ratings. This is fact can be established, is significant, is not biased, and is not embellishment (and where does it say a degree of embellishment is improper? Articles ought to be of high quality to read, they ought to be engaging, and more aesthetic writing provides that engagement.) Spartan7W § 18:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Source GOP Debate in Cleveland Makes TV Ratings history - WTAM Spartan7W § 18:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Americans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Television fan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies

Hi. My apologies. You are correct about the Luxor. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 21:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Television fan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history at George Papadopoulos shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 20:39, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Michael Flynn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Hill

Special Counsel investigation (2017–present) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Hill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Television fan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]