User talk:Tim Q. Wells
Flagged Revs
Hi,
I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 06:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- All right, thanks. Tim Q. Wells (talk) 02:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Jimbo poll revert
Oops! I was thinking of the other link downpage, sorry! rootology (C)(T) 02:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hey,
it's fine. Thanks for the message, Tim Q. Wells (talk) 04:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of wikipedia as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again!--Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 00:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
AC
I saw your idea of changing the ArbCom system. I haven't given it enough thought but if you are serious about it, perhaps a trial 2 week period might convince people that it is either a good or bad idea. ArbCom would likely object but perhaps the idea could be phrased as letting ArbCom have a fortnight holiday! Chergles (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hey,
- That is a perfect idea. A trial could show Wikipedia how well conflict resolution could work without Arbcom. I'm going to bring this up. Tim Q. Wells (talk) 18:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
Hello, Tim Q. Wells. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles from deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. You can join >> here <<. |
No flagged revisions category up for deletion
The category associated with the no flagged revisions userbox you have placed on your user page is up for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009 April 23#Category:Wikipedia users who oppose Flagged Revisions and you are invited to share your opinions on the issue. Alansohn (talk) 05:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Help for template
Hello, I've seen your name on the project template and I permis myself to ask you help: I've just created a new portal Portal:Lyon and I would like to create the templates for the subways, trams, bus. They already exist on the french wikipedia of Lyon metro for example. would you accept to help me ? Thank you Lulu97417 (talk) 16:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of Armenian footballers
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Armenian footballers. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Armenian footballers. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tellurane
Hello, Tim Q. Wells,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Otr500, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Tellurane for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Otr500}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Otr500 (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Mocoví (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)