User talk:Visionordream

Image copyright problem with Image:PL-Overview r1 c13.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:PL-Overview r1 c13.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 12:44, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Power & Light District

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Power & Light District, by Edward321 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Power & Light District seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Power & Light District, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ODI~MTA5 large.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ODI~MTA5 large.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ODI~MTA5 large.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:ODI~MTA5 large.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 20:02, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome!

Hello, Visionordream, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Neil ム 08:34, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Power & Light District

Please stop adding content about buildings which are not located in the Power & Light District. That information belongs in Downtown Kansas City or some similiar article. Likewise, please stop adding redundant content about buildings which already have their own articles (e.g. Sprint Center). It doesn't improve the quality of the P&L Dist. article, it only serves to make it longer. Precious Roy 00:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bannister mall.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bannister mall.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 06:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bannister mall.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bannister mall.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Crown center logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Crown center logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:04 Aerial 2 d.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:04 Aerial 2 d.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:02 Main Street d.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:02 Main Street d.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:05 AMC Mainstreet Theatre d.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:05 AMC Mainstreet Theatre d.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:IMG 5077.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IMG 5077.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:09, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Block 140.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Block 140.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halls (Department Store)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Halls (Department Store), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.halls.com/about/index.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 21:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Block 125(2).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Block 125(2).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bannister-mall-08.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bannister-mall-08.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Stop

Please stop uploading other people's images of buildings and other copyrighted images. They are not permitted on Wikipedia without the owners' permission. If you have photos you have taken yourself, you can upload them. Thank you. -- But|seriously|folks 03:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halls (Department Store)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Halls (Department Store), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.halls.com/about/index.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 04:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent copyright violation despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. But

-- But|seriously|folks 05:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Halls logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Halls logo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Westport High School (Missouri)

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Westport High School (Missouri), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Phgao 20:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent copyright infringement; prior block did not do any good. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. But

-- But|seriously|folks 19:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Godard

I have replaced the Speedy Tag for the third time. Please use the "hangon" process if you dispute the deletion. Continual removals of the tag by the original author is not permitted. You may be blocked. Bielle (talk) 04:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Terry Godard

An article that you have been involved in editing, Terry Godard, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Godard. Thank you. gadfium 04:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ready postcard.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ready postcard.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. DAJF (talk) 04:59, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Terryg.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Terryg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. DAJF (talk) 14:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Westport high school.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.joancrawfordbest.com/linvillewestporthigh1x.jpg. As a copyright violation, Image:Westport high school.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Westport high school.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Westport high school.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Westport high school.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Westport high school.jpg]].

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. DAJF (talk) 08:39, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Ready postcard.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.myspace.com/ready2007. As a copyright violation, Image:Ready postcard.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Ready postcard.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Ready postcard.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Ready postcard.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Ready postcard.jpg]].

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. DAJF (talk) 08:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ready postcard.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ready postcard.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Oyster guitarist 22:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Ready postcard.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:READY- A Hostage Story postcard.jpg. The copy called Image:READY- A Hostage Story postcard.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 22:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Westport High School (Missouri)-2

Hi. Please stop making the image so big inside the infobox. Images should not be the main point of the article, and doesn't need to be any bigger than what I've just set it to. Also, please start using an edit summary as a courtesy to your fellow Wikipedians. Thanks, Rjd0060 (talk) 17:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Westport middle.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Westport Middle School.jpg. The copy called Image:Westport Middle School.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 02:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Westport middle.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Westport middle.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Blue ridge crossing.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Blue ridge crossing.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 04:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Blue Ridge Mall sign.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Blue Ridge Mall sign.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Blue-ridge-mall-01.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Blue Ridge Mall sign.jpg. The copy called Image:Blue Ridge Mall sign.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 09:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Blue-ridge-mall-01.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Blue-ridge-mall-01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 10:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Westport middle school.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Westport middle school.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Terrygodard.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Terrygodard.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih (talk) 03:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ward parkway center.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ward parkway center.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:The shops on blue parkway logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:The shops on blue parkway logo.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Westport middle school.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.kcmsd.net/schools/home2.asp?schoolid=76&t=1&s=0. As a copyright violation, Image:Westport middle school.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Westport middle school.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Westport middle school.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Westport middle school.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Westport middle school.jpg]].

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. DAJF (talk) 06:10, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Westport high school.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.joancrawfordbest.com/linvillewestporthigh1x.jpg. As a copyright violation, Image:Westport high school.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Westport high school.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Westport high school.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Westport high school.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Westport high school.jpg]].

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. DAJF (talk) 06:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove speedy deletion notices yourself

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Image:Westport high school.jpg‎. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you.--DAJF (talk) 06:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.joancrawfordbest.com/linvillewestporthigh1x.jpg. As a copyright violation, Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg]].

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. DAJF (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy Delete notice(again)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Image:Westport High School of Kansas City.jpg. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --DAJF (talk) 06:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kcmsd.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Kcmsd.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kansas City, Missouri School District.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Kansas City, Missouri School District.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add copyright images to Wikipedia, having been warned and blocked previously. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ^Khukri 08:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Kcmolibrarylogo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Kcmolibrarylogo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MECU≈talk 18:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Westport High School (Missouri), makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Grey Wanderer | Talk 19:46, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Westport High School (Missouri). There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Grey Wanderer | Talk 19:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did in Westport High School (Missouri), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please this is a silly thing to get blocked over. Grey Wanderer | Talk 18:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did in Westport High School (Missouri), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Grey Wanderer (talk) 03:07, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Westport entrance.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Westport entrance.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Brianga (talk) 19:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source for Image:Westport entrance.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Westport entrance.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Van Horn at East High School

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Van Horn at East High School, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www2.kcmsd.net/Lists/News1/AllItems.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:24, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Westport entrance.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Westport entrance.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Westport entrance.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://picasaweb.google.com/brennemant/ThomasEBrennemanProjects/photo#5151325624359274082. As a copyright violation, Image:Westport entrance.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Westport entrance.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Westport entrance.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Westport entrance.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Westport entrance.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice about removal of maintenance tags

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Afrikan Centered Education Collegium Campus, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 04:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Power & Light District logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Power & Light District logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Benjamin Plaza

I have nominated Benjamin Plaza, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Plaza. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 03:02, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Westport 8th Grade Center, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please take this seriously, as this is not the first time you have had to be warned. --DAJF (talk) 02:11, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, as you did in Westport High School (Missouri), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --DAJF (talk) 02:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 39th Street

I have nominated 39th Street, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/39th Street. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. American Eagle (talk) 04:43, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vision, why are you deleting this reference

39th St. Expansion Bizjournals.com http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/stories/2008/08/04/story6.html

from the 39th St. article? ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Linwood Boulevard

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Linwood Boulevard, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

not notable, not encyclopedic

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tim Pierce (talk) 05:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:WHS Symbol from Class of 1966.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WHS Symbol from Class of 1966.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:WHS Front Door.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WHS Front Door.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kcfd logo.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Kcfd logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blue Parkway

The article Blue Parkway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's a street, with no indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 09:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blue Parkway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue Parkway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Parkway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PamD 06:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Blue Parkway. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PamD 06:58, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Troost Avenue

The article Troost Avenue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:38, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Troost Avenue

Please don't add "trivia" sections to articles. That practice is discouraged; it makes the articles look ugly and often leads to addition of useless information. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing to save this article Ten Pound Hammer? Visionordream

It's not notable. If it's not notable, it shouldn't have an article, full stop. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you've been here 5 years, I'd think you'd know how to sign talk page posts by now. And for that matter, I'd think you'd know what the hell notability criteria are here. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:51, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will have you know that I have been on a long absence. Visionordream

Four tildes. Not that hard. Should be above the tab key. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:57, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand Boulevard (Kansas City, Missouri)

The article Grand Boulevard (Kansas City, Missouri) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street. Only source is about a flag being put on it.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WHS School Sign.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WHS School Sign.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:54, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Truman Road

The article Truman Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 39th Street (Kansas City)

The article 39th Street (Kansas City) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street, sources don't look reputable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Armour Boulevard

The article Armour Boulevard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street, sources don't look reputable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard

The article Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street, nothing but trivia. Sources are local in origin and do not convey notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gillham Road

The article Gillham Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street, only source is a personal site.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:49, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Linwood Boulevard

The article Linwood Boulevard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street. Sources are unreliable or about businesses on the street, not the street itself.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Main Street (Kansas City)

The article Main Street (Kansas City) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street. Nothing but a route description, no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prospect Avenue (Kansas City, Missouri)

The article Prospect Avenue (Kansas City, Missouri) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable street, no sources, nothing but trivia

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:52, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Volker Boulevard

The article Volker Boulevard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable street, no sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:53, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 39th Street (Kansas City) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 39th Street (Kansas City) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/39th Street (Kansas City) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linwood Boulevard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linwood Boulevard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linwood Boulevard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prospect Avenue (Kansas City, Missouri) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prospect Avenue (Kansas City, Missouri) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prospect Avenue (Kansas City, Missouri) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:26, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linwood Boulevard (Kansas City, Missouri) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linwood Boulevard (Kansas City, Missouri) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linwood Boulevard (Kansas City, Missouri) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Washington-Wheatley, Kansas City for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Washington-Wheatley, Kansas City is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington-Wheatley, Kansas City until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Against the current (talk) 07:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kcfd logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kcfd logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Visionordream. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Visionordream. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Shops on Blue Parkway

The article The Shops on Blue Parkway has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a standard run-of-the-mill strip mall. Won’t meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Grey Wanderer (talk) 05:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North Kansas City Hospital for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Kansas City Hospital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Kansas City Hospital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Boleyn (talk) 21:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]