Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Huckvale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Huckvale

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Darts player does not meet criteria of WP:NSPORTS and I cannot find significant discussion of him in reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 15:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 15:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 15:17, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable sportsman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article fails the general notability guidelines due to lacking multiple in-depth reliable sources about them. That's my take on it anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tried to find more sources, couldn't. It seems not notable --AgentBarsam (talk) 08:22, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Owais ^Talk 23:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't know what makes a darts player notable, but I don't think making it to the second round of a single competition is it. I could find no in-depth, independent coverage on the topic, and therefore it's not really possible to build an encyclopedic entry, beyond a statsheet turned into prose. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.