Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apsyeoxic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —fetch ·comms 02:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apsyeoxic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find absolutely nothing to support the existence of this term. Most notably, it does not appear in the standards draft RFC4690 as linked in the article. At best, this is a neologism. The page has existed without references since 2005, when it was created by an SPA (this article's creation was its only act). --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 07:58, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I have found some mention of the strings apsyeoxic and арѕуеохіс (for example, here), but no reliable sources suggesting that the former is an adjective describing the relationship between the pair. By now there are a number of Wikipedia mirrors repeating the claim, but no independent, reliable sources that I can find. Cnilep (talk) 15:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- In that source, they are mentioned solely as an example string of characters. They are clearly not words. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 23:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Zero hits on Google Books or Scholar. Clearly not notable, probable hoax. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per the same reasons already given by --Falcon Darkstar Momot and Cnilep. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:20, 26 July 2010 (UTC) nb: I spotted it first [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.