Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BEMET

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BEMET

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The subject also lacks significant coverage. Also seems like the editor of the page has close connection with the subject. Can't find any RS about anything written. Rydex64 (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rydex64 (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Marokwitz (talk) 07:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with the others. Considered a redirect to the famous Teapacks but the connection is probably not sufficiently substential. gidonb (talk) 05:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that redirecting to Teapacks would be unwarranted. Better Nuncio (talk) 10:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.