Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blueprint Registry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:23, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blueprint Registry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Almost all the references are just mentions of the company i The NYTimes article barely mentions it,i n an article about the line of business. Forbes ditto, and also /Entrepreneur m, judging by the title--I could not identify the article. GeekWire is a classic promotional article, and reads just like a press release. The article in the Seattle Times is a local article about a local company. DGG ( talk ) 03:35, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Based on G5, G11, and it being created by a TOU violation. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a clear violation of the terms of use that should not even get the benefit of assessment under local en.Wiki policy. For what it is worth, it also fails our local policy of WP:NOTSPAM as a clearly promotional article, and the sourcing doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH, making it fail both the GNG and the NOT prong of WP:N. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per every prior argument.- Mr X 18:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.