Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chan Mou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chan Mou

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Unsourced BLP for 3 years. Claims to notability are sketchy, and I could not find any reliable sources to establish notability. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 05:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Withdraw and Keep based on sources found. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 06:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 09:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have no clue about this topic area, but there is some news coverage in Chinese, primarily relating to one of his comic books, The Ravages of Time: [1][2]. Unfortunately his name alone is almost useless as a search term in Chinese ... cab (talk) 09:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is a Chinese WP entry ( http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh/Talk:%E9%99%B3%E6%9F%90 ) , I don't speak Chinese, but a plea at the discussion page might net someone bilingual who could provide references. --Joe Decker (talk) 02:40, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the one reference for the Chinese WP entry is a broken link. J04n(talk page) 09:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom on the basis there aren't any reliable sources. If sources are added then I'll change my 'vote'. PhilKnight (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Striking 'vote' based on sources added to the article. PhilKnight (talk) 15:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The only reference on the Chinese Wiki is of a page not found dead link. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 01:50, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Check out this translation, if your looking to find more. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 01:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - seemingly fails WP:GNG. Claritas § 08:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's a page on one of his works, The Ravages of Time, which appears to have a few possible sources on it. I just added this one, which is certainly significant coverage but may not be considered reliable. Alzarian16 (talk) 10:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the sources now in place, which seem to constitue significant coverage in reliable sources. Alzarian16 (talk) 16:38, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The two sources that cab posted above state he won two awards in Taiwan for his first published work, despite being from Hong Kong. Both sources are reliable, one is from Central Daily News, a Taiwanese newspaper; and the other is Sing Pao, a newspaper from Hong Kong. _dk (talk) 13:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your comments, I've added those references, and included machine translations on the talk page. PhilKnight (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.