Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gatz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted. There is absolutely no evidence whatever of the existence of the word in the meaning attributed to it in the article. Very probably it has been made up by the creator of the article. You can take it as either a hoax or as made up by the creator: either way it qualified for speedy deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:01, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gatz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If the article was true, it would fail WP:DICDEF. But I found no confirmation of it; for all I know it could be a hoax. moreover, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/03/theater/03gatz.html this other "Gatz"] may deserve an article (two reviews by the NYT by different authors, I guess another could be found). Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 12:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.