Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Lacy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Stub vanity page. Although some journalists are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, they aren't all, and I can't see anything about Lisa Lacy which makes her suitable. A google search for "Lisa Lacy" returns the wikipedia page and nothing else related to her.
-- Ortcutt 00:35, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:49, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- A Google search does turn up a Lisa Lacy who sports a dowjones.com email address, and who has written on medical companies. However, I don't see anything notable about her, so
weakdelete for now. Sliggy 16:41, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite rooting around I can't find a "significant life science" story written by her, so I've strengthened my opinion. Sliggy 23:15, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Even if she can bake. Ifnord 18:21, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and they can recreate it if it she ever becomes notable.--MONGO 03:52, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Izehar 15:47, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.